Feedback to V1: a reverse hierarchy in vision.

Chi-Hung Juan, Vincent Walsh
Author Information
  1. Chi-Hung Juan: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. chi-hung.juan@vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

We examined the involvement of visual area V1 in visual detection to assess the role of feedback connections to V1 as proposed in reverse hierarchy theory (Ahissar and Hochstein 2000). In Experiment 1, signal detection was decreased in feature and conjunction detection tasks by repetitive pulse TMS (rTMS) over V1 for 500 ms after stimulus onset. In Experiment 2, rTMS was delayed to allow uninterrupted signal processing for 100 ms after visual stimulus onset. TMS for the subsequent 500 ms now disrupted detection of conjunction but not feature targets. In Experiment 3 we applied double pulse TMS at varying intervals to assess the timing of V1 involvement in these tasks. Single feature detection involved V1 only at some point between 40 and 100 ms after visual array onset; detection of targets defined by conjunctions of features involved V1 throughout the first 100 ms and also between 200 and 240 ms after visual stimulus onset. We suggest that the early effects in the conjunction task are due to repeated sampling of the visual array to extract the signal from external noise. The later effects in conjunction search are attributed to the return projections from secondary visual areas back to V1, consistent with the reverse hierarchy theory. The effects in both tasks are consistent with early and repeated iterations of feed forward and feedback loops as hypothesised in recent neurophysiological experiments (see Foxe and Simpson 2002).

References

Neuron. 1998 Dec;21(6):1409-22 [PMID: 9883733]
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107 [PMID: 11690606]
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996 Apr;6(2):171-8 [PMID: 8725958]
Vis Neurosci. 1999 Jan-Feb;16(1):15-34 [PMID: 10022475]
Neuroreport. 1999 Aug 20;10(12):2631-4 [PMID: 10574382]
Front Biosci. 2000 Feb 01;5:D232-43 [PMID: 10704153]
Neuroreport. 2000 Sep 28;11(14):3269-73 [PMID: 11043562]
Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1349-64 [PMID: 10788645]
Vision Res. 1998 Aug;38(15-16):2429-54 [PMID: 9798008]
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1663-8 [PMID: 9990081]
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Apr;2(4):370-4 [PMID: 10204545]
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Feb;37(2):191-8 [PMID: 10080376]
Brain Res. 1993 Mar 12;605(2):317-21 [PMID: 8386969]
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Sep;70(3):909-19 [PMID: 8229178]
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jan;142(1):139-50 [PMID: 11797091]
Science. 2001 Apr 20;292(5516):510-2 [PMID: 11313497]
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Jul 28;198(1130):1-59 [PMID: 20635]
J Neurosci. 1996 Nov 15;16(22):7376-89 [PMID: 8929444]
Trends Neurosci. 2000 Nov;23(11):571-9 [PMID: 11074267]

MeSH Term

Adult
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Feedback
Humans
Photic Stimulation
Vision, Ocular
Visual Cortex

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By