Extracellular recordings of field potentials from single cardiomyocytes.

Norbert Klauke, Godfrey L Smith, Jon Cooper
Author Information
  1. Norbert Klauke: Department of Electronics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8LT, United Kingdom. norbert@elec.gla

Abstract

Open microfluidic channels were used to separate the extracellular space around a cardiomyocyte into three compartments: the cell ends and a central partition (insulating gap). The microchannels were filled with buffer solution and overlaid with paraffin oil, thus forming the cavities for the cell ends. The central part of the cardiomyocyte rested on the partition between two adjacent microchannels and was entirely surrounded by the paraffin oil. This arrangement increased the extracellular electrical resistance to > 20 MOmega and facilitated the recording of the time course of the change in extracellular voltage and current during subthreshold and suprathreshold stimuli. The waveform of the extracellular current and voltage in response to an extracellular depolarizing stimulus comprised an initial monophasic signal followed by a biphasic signal with a delay of 2-15 ms. The latter was associated with a transient contraction and therefore caused by an action potential. The biphasic signal became monophasic after the depolarization of one cell end by raised extracellular [K+]. This form of differential recording revealed the repolarization phase of the action potential. At rest, the sarcomere length within the gap was 12% +/- 4.8% longer than outside the gap, but intracellular Ca2+ transients occurred to the same extent as that observed in the outer pools. This data demonstrate the feasibility of the use of a microfluidic bath design to limit the extracellular resistance between two ends of an isolated cardiomyocyte.

References

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Apr;278(4):H1383-94 [PMID: 10749736]
Anal Chem. 2005 Jul 15;77(14):4315-22 [PMID: 16013841]
J Physiol. 2002 Jul 15;542(Pt 2):477-92 [PMID: 12122146]
Circ Res. 2003 Mar 21;92(5):532-8 [PMID: 12609971]
Biophys J. 2003 Sep;85(3):1766-74 [PMID: 12944291]
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2003;13(5):271-84 [PMID: 14586171]
J Biomol Screen. 2002 Oct;7(5):460-5 [PMID: 14599362]
Drug Discov Today. 2004 May 15;9(10):434-41 [PMID: 15109948]
Lab Chip. 2004 Aug;4(4):357-62 [PMID: 15269804]
Drug Saf. 2004;27(11):763-72 [PMID: 15350150]
Circ Res. 1972 May;30(5):505-19 [PMID: 5026754]
Annu Rev Physiol. 1979;41:413-24 [PMID: 373598]
Circ Res. 1981 Nov;49(5):1129-39 [PMID: 7296780]
Pflugers Arch. 1987 Sep;410(1-2):7-14 [PMID: 2446251]
J Physiol. 1989 Apr;411:393-418 [PMID: 2614727]
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995 May;27(5):1111-22 [PMID: 7473769]
Cardiovasc Res. 1999 Jan;41(1):25-40 [PMID: 10325951]
Nature. 1959 May 9;183(4671):1341-2 [PMID: 13657117]
Biophys J. 2005 Apr;88(4):3018-37 [PMID: 15653720]
Biophys J. 2005 Apr;88(4):3038-49 [PMID: 15665123]
Eur J Pharmacol. 2001 Jun 22;422(1-3):137-48 [PMID: 11430924]

MeSH Term

Action Potentials
Animals
Calcium
Cell Shape
Electric Stimulation
In Vitro Techniques
Microelectrodes
Microfluidics
Myocardial Contraction
Myocytes, Cardiac
Rabbits
Sarcomeres

Chemicals

Calcium

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By