Insights into the fate of a 13C labelled phenol pulse for stable isotope probing (SIP) experiments.

Mike Manefield, Rob Griffiths, Niall P McNamara, Darren Sleep, Nick Ostle, Andrew Whiteley
Author Information
  1. Mike Manefield: Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bioinnovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia. manefield@unsw.edu.au

Abstract

Stable isotope probing (SIP) using DNA or RNA as a biomarker has proven to be a useful method for attributing substrate utilisation to specific microbial taxa. In this study we followed the transfer of a (13)C(6)-phenol pulse in an activated sludge micro-reactor to examine the resulting distribution of labelled carbon in the context of SIP. Most of the added phenol was metabolically converted within the first 100 min after (13)C(6)-phenol addition, with 49% incorporated into microbial biomass and 6% respired as CO(2). Less than 1% of the total (13)C labelled carbon supplied was incorporated into microbial RNA and DNA, with RNA labelling 6.5 times faster than DNA. The remainder of the added (13)C was adsorbed and/or complexed to suspended solids within the sludge. The (13)C content of nucleic acids increased beyond the initial consumption of the (13)C-phenol pulse. This study confirms that RNA labels more efficiently than DNA and reveals that only a small proportion of a pulse is incorporated into nucleic acids. Evidence of continued (13)C incorporation into nucleic acids suggests that cross-feeding of the SIP substrate was rapid. This highlights both the benefits of using a biomarker that is rapidly labelled and the importance of sampling within appropriate timescales to avoid or capture the effects of cross-feeding, depending on the goal of the study.

MeSH Term

Biomass
Bioreactors
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Isotopes
DNA, Bacterial
Isotope Labeling
Mass Spectrometry
Phenol
RNA, Bacterial
Sewage

Chemicals

Carbon Isotopes
DNA, Bacterial
RNA, Bacterial
Sewage
Carbon Dioxide
Phenol

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By