Straightforward inference of ancestry and admixture proportions through ancestry-informative insertion deletion multiplexing.

Rui Pereira, Christopher Phillips, Nádia Pinto, Carla Santos, Sidney Emanuel Batista dos Santos, António Amorim, Ángel Carracedo, Leonor Gusmão
Author Information
  1. Rui Pereira: IPATIMUP-Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Abstract

Ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) show high allele frequency divergence between different ancestral or geographically distant populations. These genetic markers are especially useful in inferring the likely ancestral origin of an individual or estimating the apportionment of ancestry components in admixed individuals or populations. The study of AIMs is of great interest in clinical genetics research, particularly to detect and correct for population substructure effects in case-control association studies, but also in population and forensic genetics studies. This work presents a set of 46 ancestry-informative insertion deletion polymorphisms selected to efficiently measure population admixture proportions of four different origins (African, European, East Asian and Native American). All markers are analyzed in short fragments (under 230 basepairs) through a single PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis (CE) allowing a very simple one tube PCR-to-CE approach. HGDP-CEPH diversity panel samples from the four groups, together with Oceanians, were genotyped to evaluate the efficiency of the assay in clustering populations from different continental origins and to establish reference databases. In addition, other populations from diverse geographic origins were tested using the HGDP-CEPH samples as reference data. The results revealed that the AIM-INDEL set developed is highly efficient at inferring the ancestry of individuals and provides good estimates of ancestry proportions at the population level. In conclusion, we have optimized the multiplexed genotyping of 46 AIM-INDELs in a simple and informative assay, enabling a more straightforward alternative to the commonly available AIM-SNP typing methods dependent on complex, multi-step protocols or implementation of large-scale genotyping technologies.

References

Hum Mutat. 2010 Dec;31(12):E1875-93 [PMID: 20886636]
J Forensic Sci. 2003 Jul;48(4):771-82 [PMID: 12877291]
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Oct;71(4):854-62 [PMID: 12205564]
Hum Mutat. 2010 Feb;31(2):184-90 [PMID: 19953531]
BMC Genet. 2009 Oct 27;10:69 [PMID: 19860882]
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 11;4(8):e6583 [PMID: 19668368]
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):928-33 [PMID: 11237013]
Nature. 2008 Dec 11;456(7223):728-31 [PMID: 19079049]
Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7 [PMID: 21565059]
Genome Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):830-9 [PMID: 21460062]
Science. 2002 Dec 20;298(5602):2381-5 [PMID: 12493913]
Hum Mutat. 2008 May;29(5):648-58 [PMID: 18286470]
Science. 2010 Oct 29;330(6004):641-6 [PMID: 21030649]
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 May;12(5):363-76 [PMID: 21358748]
J Med Genet. 2010 Dec;47(12):835-47 [PMID: 20921023]
BMC Genet. 2009 Jul 24;10:39 [PMID: 19630973]
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 15;5(10):e13443 [PMID: 20976178]
Nature. 2010 Apr 1;464(7289):704-12 [PMID: 19812545]
Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Oct 15;19(R2):R131-6 [PMID: 20858594]
Electrophoresis. 2009 Nov;30(21):3682-90 [PMID: 19862748]
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Apr;60(4):957-64 [PMID: 9106543]
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jul;11(7):459-63 [PMID: 20548291]
Science. 2002 Apr 12;296(5566):261-2 [PMID: 11954565]
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Feb;82(2):453-63 [PMID: 18252225]
Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Oct 15;17(R2):R143-50 [PMID: 18852203]
Genome Res. 2006 Sep;16(9):1182-90 [PMID: 16902084]
Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:11-24 [PMID: 21226609]
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Apr;78(4):680-90 [PMID: 16532397]
PLoS Genet. 2008 Jan;4(1):e5 [PMID: 18208330]
Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;35(1):80-3 [PMID: 21181899]
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Dec;73(6):1402-22 [PMID: 14631557]
Hum Genet. 2005 Dec;118(3-4):382-92 [PMID: 16193326]
Bioinformatics. 2007 Mar 1;23(5):644-5 [PMID: 17267436]
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Feb;6(2):95-108 [PMID: 15716906]
Investig Genet. 2011 Jan 05;2(1):1 [PMID: 21208434]
Int J Legal Med. 2012 Jan;126(1):97-105 [PMID: 21717151]
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 May;84(5):641-50 [PMID: 19442770]
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jul;67(1):170-81 [PMID: 10827107]
Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):997-1004 [PMID: 11315092]
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Dec;1(3-4):273-80 [PMID: 19083773]
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921 [PMID: 11237011]
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9 [PMID: 16862161]
Hum Mutat. 2009 Jan;30(1):69-78 [PMID: 18683858]
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59 [PMID: 10835412]
PLoS Genet. 2005 Dec;1(6):e70 [PMID: 16355252]
Nat Genet. 2004 May;36(5):512-7 [PMID: 15052271]
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 15;23(14):1801-6 [PMID: 17485429]
Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87 [PMID: 12930761]
Ann Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;70(Pt 6):841-7 [PMID: 17044859]
Nature. 2006 Nov 23;444(7118):444-54 [PMID: 17122850]
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Mar;12(3):179-92 [PMID: 21331090]

MeSH Term

Asian People
Black People
DNA
Electrophoresis, Capillary
Gene Frequency
Genetic Variation
Genetics, Population
Genotype
Genotyping Techniques
Humans
INDEL Mutation
Indians, North American
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
White People

Chemicals

DNA

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By