Reference gene selection for real-time quantitative PCR analysis of the mouse uterus in the peri-implantation period.

Pengfei Lin, Xiangli Lan, Fenglei Chen, Yanzhou Yang, Yaping Jin, Aihua Wang
Author Information
  1. Pengfei Lin: Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China. pflin2001n@163.com

Abstract

The study of uterine gene expression patterns is valuable for understanding the biological and molecular mechanisms that occur during embryo implantation. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) is an extremely sensitive technique that allows for the precise quantification of mRNA abundance; however, selecting stable reference genes suitable for the normalization of qRT-PCR data is required to avoid the misinterpretation of experimental results and erroneous analyses. This study employs several mouse models, including an early pregnancy, a pseudopregnancy, a delayed implantation and activation, an artificial decidualization and a hormonal treatment model; ten candidate reference genes (PPIA, RPLP0, HPRT1, GAPDH, ACTB, TBP, B2M, 18S, UBC and TUBA) that are found in uterine tissues were assessed for their suitability as internal controls for relative qRT-PCR quantification. GeNorm(PLUS), NormFinder, and BestKeeper were used to evaluate these candidate reference genes, and all of these methods identified RPLP0 and GAPDH as the most stable candidates and B2M and 18S as the least stable candidates. However, when the different models were analyzed separately, the reference genes exhibited some variation in their expression levels.

References

  1. BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Nov 01;10:100 [PMID: 19878604]
  2. Hum Reprod. 2012 Jan;27(1):251-6 [PMID: 22052386]
  3. Methods. 2010 Apr;50(4):227-30 [PMID: 19969088]
  4. BMC Mol Biol. 2010 Dec 01;11:90 [PMID: 21122122]
  5. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2010 Aug;42(8):568-74 [PMID: 20705598]
  6. BMC Res Notes. 2009 Dec 11;2:246 [PMID: 20003356]
  7. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 May 6;408(2):265-8 [PMID: 21501585]
  8. Sex Dev. 2009;3(4):194-204 [PMID: 19752599]
  9. J Mol Neurosci. 2009 Mar;37(3):238-53 [PMID: 18607772]
  10. Semin Reprod Med. 2010 Jan;28(1):17-26 [PMID: 20104425]
  11. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Aug;18(6):234-9 [PMID: 17588769]
  12. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45224 [PMID: 23028860]
  13. BMC Genomics. 2007 May 22;8:127 [PMID: 17519037]
  14. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245-50 [PMID: 15289330]
  15. Neurosci Lett. 2008 Dec 5;447(1):54-7 [PMID: 18835423]
  16. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011 May;125(1-4):124-32 [PMID: 21411251]
  17. Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034 [PMID: 12184808]
  18. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2011 Jan 01;3:745-67 [PMID: 21196409]
  19. Methods. 2010 Apr;50(4):S1-5 [PMID: 20215014]
  20. Fertil Steril. 2009 May;91(5 Suppl):2116-22 [PMID: 18384781]
  21. Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep;96(3):530-5 [PMID: 21880274]
  22. Methods. 2010 Apr;50(4):217-26 [PMID: 20025972]
  23. BMC Dev Biol. 2007 Mar 06;7:14 [PMID: 17341302]
  24. Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509-15 [PMID: 15127793]
  25. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec;1822(12):1943-50 [PMID: 22683339]

MeSH Term

Animals
Computational Biology
Embryo Implantation
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation
Male
Mice
Pregnancy
Uterus

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By