PURPOSE: To develop 28 short sentence optotypes for the English version of the Radner Reading Charts that are as comparable as possible in number and length of words, as well as in difficulty and syntactical construction.
METHODS: Thirty-four English sentences were constructed following the method used for other Radner Reading Charts to obtain "sentence optotypes" with comparable structure and the same lexical and grammatical difficulty. Best comparable sentences were statistically selected and standardized in 50 volunteers. Reading speed and the number of errors were determined. Validity was analyzed with a 124-word long 4th-grade paragraph of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test®. Computerized measurements of reading parameters were performed with the RADNER Reading Device (RAD-RD©; in conjunction with a PC and microphone).
RESULTS: The mean reading speed obtained with the 28 selected short sentences was 201.53 ± 35.88 words per minute (wpm), as compared to 215.01 ± 30.37 wpm for the long paragraph. The mean reading times were 4.30 ± 0.79 s and 35.26 ± 4.85 s, respectively. The mean number of reading errors was 0.11 ± 0.34. The correlation between the short sentences and the long paragraph was high (r = 0.76; p < 0.05; n = 50). Reliability analyses yielded an overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.9743.
CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that the 28 selected English sentence optotypes are comparable in terms of both lexical difficulty as well as in reading length, and it demonstrates the validity and reliability of such sentences as test items for determining reading parameters such as reading acuity and speed.
Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan;110(1):65-9
[PMID:
12511348]
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;244(2):154-62
[PMID:
16047185]
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;250(2):201-9
[PMID:
21901296]
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980 Jun;57(6):378-87
[PMID:
7406006]
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1883-91
[PMID:
15342050]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Nov 10;151(45):2494-7
[PMID:
18062591]
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Mar;33(3):677-87
[PMID:
1544792]
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Apr;40(5):865-77
[PMID:
10102283]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998 Sep;213(3):174-81
[PMID:
9793916]
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Nov;28(11):1957-63
[PMID:
12457669]
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jun;30(6):1259-67
[PMID:
15177601]
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;37(3):441-5
[PMID:
21333867]
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;46(6):2071-5
[PMID:
15914625]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1990 Mar;196(3):150-7
[PMID:
2342315]
J Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;24(3):251-6
[PMID:
18416259]
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):461-7
[PMID:
12107513]
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2015-21
[PMID:
17137977]
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 May;243(5):478-81
[PMID:
15586288]
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Apr;40(5):858-64
[PMID:
10102282]
Ophthalmology. 2007 Mar;114(3):551-60
[PMID:
17324697]
Optom Vis Sci. 1989 Dec;66(12):843-53
[PMID:
2626251]
Scand J Soc Med Suppl. 1984;35:5-60
[PMID:
6596703]
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):638-42
[PMID:
18361987]
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Jan;38(1):72-82
[PMID:
9008632]
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Mar;38(3):557-68
[PMID:
9071208]
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;142(4):620-4
[PMID:
17011854]
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;242(1):31-9
[PMID:
14666372]
Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Jan;70(1):54-65
[PMID:
8430009]
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Aug;31(8):1544-8
[PMID:
16129289]
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;89(10):1324-9
[PMID:
16170125]
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 May;85(5):353-8
[PMID:
18451739]
