T Bechshoft, A E Derocher, E Richardson, P Mislan, N J Lunn, C Sonne, R Dietz, D M Janz, V L St Louis
Non-invasive methods of assessing animal health and life history are becoming increasingly popular in wildlife research; hair samples from polar bears (Ursus maritimus), are being used to study an ever broader range of anthropogenic and endocrine compounds. A number of contaminants are known to disrupt endocrine function in polar bears. However, the relationship between mercury and cortisol remains unknown, although mercury is an endocrine disruptor in other species. Here, we examine the relationship between concentrations of cortisol and total mercury (THg) analyzed in guard hair from 378 polar bears (184 females, 194 males) sampled in Western Hudson Bay, 2004-2012. The difference in mean cortisol concentration between female (0.8 ± 0.6 pg/mg) and male (0.7 ± 0.5 pg/mg) polar bears bordered on significance (p = 0.054). However, mean mercury concentration was significantly greater (p = 0.009) in females (4.7 ± 1.4 μg/g) than males (4.3 ± 1.2 μg/g). Hair cortisol in males was significantly influenced by mercury, age, and fatness, as well as interactions between mercury and year, mercury and fatness, and year and fatness (all: p < 0.03) (multiple regression analysis, whole model: r(2) = 0.14, F(7,185) = 4.43, p = 0.0001). Fatness was the only significant variable in the multiple regression analysis for females (r(2) = 0.06, F(1,182) = 13.0, p = 0.0004). In conclusion, a significant, but complex, relationship was found between mercury and cortisol concentrations in hair from male, but not female, polar bears.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e34777
[PMID:
22567089]
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Jul 1;408(15):2995-3043
[PMID:
19910021]
Ecotoxicology. 2009 Jul;18(5):514-21
[PMID:
19360470]
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012 Dec;31(12):2739-47
[PMID:
22987581]
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39(3):228-69
[PMID:
19280433]
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999 May 15;157(1):16-22
[PMID:
10329503]
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Jul;28(7):1416-24
[PMID:
19226182]
Mol Ecol. 2010 Jan;19(2):307-14
[PMID:
20002585]
Ecotoxicology. 2010 Oct;19(7):1277-84
[PMID:
20596767]
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1977;5(3):369-83
[PMID:
405933]
Aquat Toxicol. 2011 Oct;105(3-4):321-7
[PMID:
21801696]
Am J Primatol. 2011 Sep;73(9):903-8
[PMID:
21538448]
Environ Int. 2010 Jul;36(5):461-91
[PMID:
20398940]
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2014 Jan 1;195:151-6
[PMID:
24239791]
Arch Toxicol. 1981 Aug;48(1):11-20
[PMID:
7283745]
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Aug;19(8):2360-72
[PMID:
23640921]
J Wildl Dis. 1989 Apr;25(2):159-68
[PMID:
2716095]
Theriogenology. 2012 Jul 15;78(2):308-14
[PMID:
22538002]
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008 Oct;27(10):2064-70
[PMID:
18386944]
Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Oct 1;37(19):4390-6
[PMID:
14572090]
Environ Res. 2011 Nov;111(8):1124-36
[PMID:
21903210]
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Jan;28(1):133-40
[PMID:
18717617]
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(5):2989-96
[PMID:
24559486]
Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011 Sep;37(3):485-93
[PMID:
21110088]
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 15;443:775-90
[PMID:
23231888]
J Environ Monit. 2011 Aug;13(8):2260-7
[PMID:
21687839]
Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2010 Oct;39(3):171-80
[PMID:
20705413]
Environ Int. 2012 Sep 15;45:15-21
[PMID:
22572112]
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 15;45(22):9793-8
[PMID:
22014184]
Environ Res. 2007 May;104(1):85-95
[PMID:
16996054]
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Feb 15;45(4):1458-65
[PMID:
21214235]
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jul 15;45(14):5922-8
[PMID:
21678897]
Environ Physiol Biochem. 1975;5(6):428-39
[PMID:
1213032]
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Oct 15;408(22):5613-8
[PMID:
20800875]
Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Feb 15;40(4):1120-5
[PMID:
16572764]
Toxicology. 2010 Nov 28;278(1):112-23
[PMID:
20561558]
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011 Jul 1;172(3):382-91
[PMID:
21501613]
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Jan 15;409(4):831-4
[PMID:
21144554]
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004 Jun 25;67(12):959-77
[PMID:
15205038]
Environ Res. 2012 Jul;116:26-35
[PMID:
22575327]
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2009 Mar;12(3):206-23
[PMID:
19466673]
