Effects of a Responsiveness-Focused Intervention in Family Child Care Homes on Children's Executive Function.

Emily C Merz, Susan H Landry, Ursula Y Johnson, Jeffrey M Williams, Kwanghee Jung
Author Information
  1. Emily C Merz: Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th Street, 7 floor, New York, NY 10032, USA.
  2. Susan H Landry: Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, 23 floor, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  3. Ursula Y Johnson: Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, 23 floor, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  4. Jeffrey M Williams: Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, 23 floor, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  5. Kwanghee Jung: Children's Learning Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, 23 floor, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Abstract

Caregiver responsiveness has been theorized and found to support children's early executive function (EF) development. This study examined the effects of an intervention that targeted family child care provider responsiveness on children's EF. Family child care providers were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups or a control group. An intervention group that received a responsiveness-focused online professional development course and another intervention group that received this online course plus weekly mentoring were collapsed into one group because they did not differ on any of the outcome variables. Children ( = 141) ranged in age from 2.5 to 5 years (mean age = 3.58 years; 52% female). At pretest and posttest, children completed delay inhibition tasks (gift delay-wrap, gift delay-bow) and conflict EF tasks (bear/dragon, dimensional change card sort), and parents reported on the children's level of attention problems. Although there were no main effects of the intervention on children's EF, there were significant interactions between intervention status and child age for delay inhibition and attention problems. The youngest children improved in delay inhibition and attention problems if they were in the intervention rather than the control group, whereas older children did not. These results suggest that improving family child care provider responsive behaviors may facilitate the development of certain EF skills in young preschool-age children.

Keywords

References

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;52(1):33-46 [PMID: 20500238]
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013 Aug;78(4):16-33 [PMID: 23952200]
Early Child Res Q. 2014 Jan 1;28(1):null [PMID: 24347815]
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Summer;20(3):821-43 [PMID: 18606033]
Child Dev Perspect. 2010 Dec;4(3):181-188 [PMID: 21779305]
Cogn Dev. 2014 Jan;29:null [PMID: 24357896]
Dev Sci. 2012 Jan;15(1):12-24 [PMID: 22251288]
Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):339-57 [PMID: 10834469]
Neuroimage. 2003 Mar;18(3):789-97 [PMID: 12667855]
Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(3):205-28 [PMID: 18473197]
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jan;43(1):208-21 [PMID: 17201520]
Child Dev. 2014 Mar-Apr;85(2):397-404 [PMID: 23711103]
Dev Psychol. 2001 May;37(3):387-403 [PMID: 11370914]
Child Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;72(5):1394-408 [PMID: 11699677]
Child Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;75(1):47-65 [PMID: 15015674]
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1176-91 [PMID: 20822231]
Dev Psychol. 2014 Feb;50(2):526-41 [PMID: 23772822]
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jul;42(4):627-42 [PMID: 16802896]
Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1428-46 [PMID: 18020822]
Child Dev. 2012 May-Jun;83(3):1022-36 [PMID: 22469209]
Dev Psychol. 2014 Oct;50(10):2368-79 [PMID: 25069051]
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):867-76 [PMID: 19481109]
Am Psychol. 2006 Feb-Mar;61(2):99-116 [PMID: 16478355]
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):99-114 [PMID: 15656741]
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):362-78 [PMID: 21291447]
Early Child Res Q. 2013 Oct 1;28(4):null [PMID: 24187434]
Child Dev. 2001 Jul-Aug;72(4):1032-53 [PMID: 11480933]
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Jan;41(1):43-56 [PMID: 22798038]
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):1257-74 [PMID: 24255933]
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):637-71 [PMID: 12613671]
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Dec;110(4):611-25 [PMID: 21798554]
Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1900-2 [PMID: 16809525]
Dev Psychol. 2000 Mar;36(2):220-32 [PMID: 10749079]
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2007 Jan;28(1):40-55 [PMID: 21687825]
Early Child Res Q. 2008 Jan 1;23(1):69-93 [PMID: 19609366]
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:145-73 [PMID: 16903808]
Dev Psychol. 2002 Mar;38(2):313-26 [PMID: 11881765]
Child Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;75(1):296-312 [PMID: 15015691]
J Sch Psychol. 2010 Feb;48(1):85-112 [PMID: 20006989]
Child Dev. 2011 Nov-Dec;82(6):1970-84 [PMID: 22026915]
Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(2):162-80 [PMID: 21347919]
Dev Psychol. 2009 Jul;45(4):958-72 [PMID: 19586173]
Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):1105-22 [PMID: 15535760]
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2003;68(3):vii-137 [PMID: 14723273]
Child Dev. 2010 Jan-Feb;81(1):326-39 [PMID: 20331670]
Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(2):573-94 [PMID: 16144428]
Dev Psychol. 2011 Jul;47(4):905-15 [PMID: 21553957]
Early Child Res Q. 2008 Oct 1;23(4):527-546 [PMID: 19802343]
Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(2):595-616 [PMID: 16144429]
Child Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;74(5):1454-75 [PMID: 14552408]
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009 Oct 3;32(1):8-22 [PMID: 20593008]
Science. 2007 Nov 30;318(5855):1387-8 [PMID: 18048670]
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Feb;25(1):86-96 [PMID: 21355649]
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1335-53 [PMID: 18793067]
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:190-222 [PMID: 20201874]
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010;39(4):568-80 [PMID: 20589567]
Child Dev. 2013 Nov-Dec;84(6):2112-30 [PMID: 23534487]
J Educ Psychol. 2010 Feb 1;102(1):43-53 [PMID: 20411025]
Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;134(1):31-60 [PMID: 18193994]
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jul;43(4):947-59 [PMID: 17605527]

Grants

  1. T32 MH013043/NIMH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By