Differing molecular response of young and advanced maternal age human oocytes to IVM.

J M Reyes, E Silva, J L Chitwood, W B Schoolcraft, R L Krisher, P J Ross
Author Information
  1. J M Reyes: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  2. E Silva: Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, 10290 Ridgegate Circle, Lone Tree, CO 80124, USA.
  3. J L Chitwood: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  4. W B Schoolcraft: Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, 10290 Ridgegate Circle, Lone Tree, CO 80124, USA.
  5. R L Krisher: Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, 10290 Ridgegate Circle, Lone Tree, CO 80124, USA.
  6. P J Ross: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What effect does maternal age have on the human oocyte's molecular response to in vitro oocyte maturation?
SUMMARY ANSWER: Although polyadenylated transcript abundance is similar between young and advanced maternal age (AMA) germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes exhibit a divergent transcriptome resulting from a differential response to in vitro oocyte maturation.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Microarray studies considering maternal age or maturation stage have shown that either of these factors will affect oocyte polyadenylated transcript abundance in human oocytes. However, studies considering both human oocyte age and multiple stages simultaneously are limited to a single study that examined transcript levels for two genes by qPCR. Thus, polyadenylated RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) could provide novel insight into age-associated aberrations in gene expression in GV and MII oocytes.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The effect of maternal age (longitudinal analysis) on polyadenylated transcript abundance at different stages was analyzed by examining single GV and single in vitro matured MII oocytes derived from five young (YNG; < 30 years; average age 26.8; range 20-29) and five advanced maternal age (AMA; ≥40 years; average age 41.6 years; range 40-43 years) patients. Thus, a total of 10 YNG (5 GV and 5 MII) and 10 AMA (5 GV and 5 MII) oocytes were individually processed for RNA-Seq analysis.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS: Patients undergoing infertility treatment at the Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine (Lone Tree, CO, USA) underwent ovarian stimulation with FSH and received hCG for final follicular maturation prior to ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval. Unused GV oocytes obtained at retrieval were donated for transcriptome analysis. Single oocytes were stored (at -80°C in PicoPure RNA Extraction Buffer; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) immediately upon verification of immaturity or after undergoing in vitro oocyte maturation (24 h incubation), representing GV and MII samples, respectively. After isolating RNA and generating single oocyte RNA-Seq libraries (SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA HV kit; Clontech, USA), Illumina sequencing (100 bp paired-end reads on HiSeq 2500) and bioinformatics analysis (CLC Genomics Workbench, DESeq2, weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA), Ingenuity Pathway Analysis) were performed.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 12 770 genes were determined to be expressed in human oocytes (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) > 0.4 in at least three of five replicates for a minimum of one sample type). Differential gene expression analysis between YNG and AMA oocytes (within stage) identified 1 and 255 genes that significantly differed (adjusted P < 0.1 and log2 fold change >1) in polyadenylated transcript abundance for GV and MII oocytes, respectively. These genes included CDK1, NLRP5 and PRDX1, which have been reported to affect oocyte developmental potential. Despite the similarity in transcript abundance between GV oocytes irrespective of age, divergent expression patterns emerged during oocyte maturation. These age-specific differentially expressed genes were enriched (FDR < 0.05) for functions and pathways associated with mitochondria, cell cycle and cytoskeleton. Gene modules generated by WGCNA (based on gene expression) and patient traits related to oocyte quality (e.g. age and blastocyst development) were correlated (P < 0.05) and enriched (FDR < 0.05) for functions and pathways associated with oocyte maturation.
LARGE SCALE DATA: Raw data from this study can be accessed through GSE95477.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The human oocytes used in the current study were obtained from patients with varying causes of infertility (e.g. decreased oocyte quality and oocyte quality-independent factors), possibly affecting oocyte gene expression. Oocytes in this study were retrieved at the GV stage following hCG administration and the MII oocytes were derived by IVM of patient oocytes. Although the approach has the benefit of identifying intrinsic differences between samples, it may not be completely representative of in vivo matured oocytes.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Transcriptome profiles of YNG and AMA oocytes, particularly at the MII stage, suggest that aberrant transcript abundance may contribute to the age-associated decline in fertility.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): J.M.R. was supported by an Austin Eugene Lyons Fellowship awarded by the University of California, Davis. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (awarded to P.J.R.; R01HD070044) and the Fertility Laboratories of Colorado partly supported the research presented in this manuscript.

Keywords

References

  1. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015 Feb;82(2):103-14 [PMID: 25560149]
  2. Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 24;7:10809 [PMID: 26904963]
  3. Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Oct 1;13(19):2263-78 [PMID: 15317747]
  4. Biol Reprod. 2016 Apr;94(4):76 [PMID: 26911429]
  5. Hum Reprod. 2009 Feb;24(2):415-24 [PMID: 19054779]
  6. Dev Biol. 2007 Feb 1;302(1):104-17 [PMID: 17022963]
  7. Hum Reprod. 2008 May;23(5):1138-44 [PMID: 18346995]
  8. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Jun 1;21(11):2476-84 [PMID: 22367880]
  9. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):54-9 [PMID: 12626143]
  10. Zygote. 2011 Feb;19(1):15-20 [PMID: 20569513]
  11. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Nov 24;12:111 [PMID: 25421171]
  12. Lancet. 1991 Jun 8;337(8754):1375-7 [PMID: 1674764]
  13. Mitochondrion. 2011 Sep;11(5):797-813 [PMID: 20933103]
  14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;198(4):455.e1-9; discussion 455.e9-11 [PMID: 18395038]
  15. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jun;18(6):864-80 [PMID: 19490793]
  16. Nature. 2013 Aug 29;500(7464):593-7 [PMID: 23892778]
  17. Cell Tissue Res. 2016 Jan;363(1):69-84 [PMID: 26340983]
  18. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(1):1-13 [PMID: 19033363]
  19. J Cell Physiol. 2006 Mar;206(3):565-73 [PMID: 16155907]
  20. Mol Cell. 2013 Nov 7;52(3):325-39 [PMID: 24095281]
  21. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002 Jun;8(6):580-5 [PMID: 12029077]
  22. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2001 Feb;12(1):37-43 [PMID: 11162745]
  23. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013 Sep;20(9):1131-9 [PMID: 23934149]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 17;103(3):608-13 [PMID: 16407128]
  25. Nat Methods. 2009 May;6(5):377-82 [PMID: 19349980]
  26. Hum Reprod. 2010 Apr;25(4):957-68 [PMID: 20147335]
  27. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559 [PMID: 19114008]
  28. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Sep;943:26-33 [PMID: 11594545]
  29. J Cell Sci. 2013 Jul 1;126(Pt 13):2955-64 [PMID: 23659999]
  30. Hum Reprod. 2002 Apr;17(4):903-11 [PMID: 11925379]
  31. PLoS One. 2010 Sep 07;5(9):e12587 [PMID: 20830304]
  32. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44-57 [PMID: 19131956]
  33. Dev Biol. 2014 Feb 15;386(2):331-9 [PMID: 24374158]
  34. Biol Reprod. 2007 Jul;77(1):2-8 [PMID: 17314311]
  35. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000598 [PMID: 20011106]
  36. J Biol Chem. 2011 Nov 25;286(47):40743-9 [PMID: 21953461]
  37. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013 Nov;97(11):709-25 [PMID: 24265125]
  38. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550 [PMID: 25516281]

Grants

  1. R01 HD070044/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Female
Humans
In Vitro Oocyte Maturation Techniques
Infertility, Female
Maternal Age
Oocytes
Ovulation Induction
Transcriptome
Young Adult