OsJAZ1 Attenuates Drought Resistance by Regulating JA and ABA Signaling in Rice.

Jie Fu, Hua Wu, Siqi Ma, Denghao Xiang, Ruyi Liu, Lizhong Xiong
Author Information
  1. Jie Fu: National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
  2. Hua Wu: National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
  3. Siqi Ma: National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
  4. Denghao Xiang: National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
  5. Ruyi Liu: National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
  6. Lizhong Xiong: National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.

Abstract

Jasmonates (JAs) and abscisic acid (ABA) are phytohormones known play important roles in plant response and adaptation to various abiotic stresses including salinity, drought, wounding, and cold. JAZ (JASMONATE ZIM-domain) proteins have been reported to play negative roles in JA signaling. However, direct evidence is still lacking that JAZ proteins regulate drought resistance. In this study, OsJAZ1 was investigated for its role in drought resistance in rice. Expression of was strongly responsive to JA treatment, and it was slightly responsive to ABA, salicylic acid, and abiotic stresses including drought, salinity, and cold. The -overexpression rice plants were more sensitive to drought stress treatment than the wild-type (WT) rice Zhonghua 11 (ZH11) at both the seedling and reproductive stages, while the T-DNA insertion mutant plants showed increased drought tolerance compared to the WT plants. The -overexpression plants were hyposensitive to MeJA and ABA, whereas the mutant plants were hypersensitive to MeJA and ABA. In addition, there were significant differences in shoot and root length between the OsJAZ1 transgenic and WT plants under the MeJA and ABA treatments. A subcellular localization assay indicated that OsJAZ1 was localized in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. Transcriptome profiling analysis by RNA-seq revealed that the expression levels of many genes in the ABA and JA signaling pathways exhibited significant differences between the -overexpression plants and WT ZH11 under drought stress treatment. Quantitative real-time PCR confirmed the expression profiles of some of the differentially expressed genes, including , and . These results together suggest that OsJAZ1 plays a role in regulating the drought resistance of rice partially via the ABA and JA pathways.

Keywords

References

  1. Plant Cell. 2011 Mar;23(3):1000-13 [PMID: 21447791]
  2. Plant Physiol. 2011 Jan;155(1):553-61 [PMID: 20978156]
  3. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012 Sep;10(7):792-805 [PMID: 22551450]
  4. Plant Cell. 2009 Jan;21(1):131-45 [PMID: 19151223]
  5. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(1):e27639 [PMID: 24394987]
  6. Plant Cell. 2006 Dec;18(12):3415-28 [PMID: 17194765]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):20148-53 [PMID: 23169619]
  8. Plant Cell. 2003 Jan;15(1):63-78 [PMID: 12509522]
  9. Plant Sci. 2015 Mar;232:1-12 [PMID: 25617318]
  10. Nat Genet. 2008 Jun;40(6):761-7 [PMID: 18454147]
  11. Plant Physiol. 1996 Jan;110(1):249-257 [PMID: 12226181]
  12. J Exp Bot. 2012 Jun;63(10):3643-56 [PMID: 22412187]
  13. Mol Genet Genomics. 2010 Sep;284(3):173-83 [PMID: 20632034]
  14. Nature. 2010 Nov 18;468(7322):400-5 [PMID: 20927106]
  15. Mol Plant. 2011 Mar;4(2):279-88 [PMID: 21242320]
  16. Protoplasma. 2013 Feb;250(1):241-9 [PMID: 22456953]
  17. Plant Cell. 2011 Feb;23(2):701-15 [PMID: 21335373]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):E1192-200 [PMID: 22529386]
  19. Plant Cell. 1998 Dec;10(12):2103-13 [PMID: 9836748]
  20. Plant Physiol. 2016 Aug;171(4):2810-25 [PMID: 27325665]
  21. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(5):824-34 [PMID: 18451790]
  22. Plant Cell. 2013 Aug;25(8):2907-24 [PMID: 23933884]
  23. Plant Mol Biol. 2009 Oct;71(3):291-305 [PMID: 19618278]
  24. Plant J. 2011 Mar;65(6):907-21 [PMID: 21332845]
  25. Plant J. 2008 Mar;53(5):814-27 [PMID: 18036197]
  26. Development. 2005 Apr;132(7):1477-85 [PMID: 15728674]
  27. Plant Physiol. 2014 Mar;164(3):1151-60 [PMID: 24429214]
  28. Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):661-5 [PMID: 17637677]
  29. FEBS Lett. 2001 Apr 13;494(3):161-4 [PMID: 11311233]
  30. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(5):1439-63 [PMID: 19181866]
  31. F1000Res. 2013 Sep 16;2:188 [PMID: 24555089]
  32. Plant Cell. 2016 Sep;28(9):2161-2177 [PMID: 27468891]
  33. Trends Genet. 2003 Jul;19(7):409-13 [PMID: 12850447]
  34. Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106 [PMID: 20979621]
  35. Plant J. 2003 Feb;33(4):751-63 [PMID: 12609047]
  36. Nat Commun. 2014 Mar 19;5:3476 [PMID: 24647160]
  37. J Exp Bot. 2017 Mar 1;68(6):1303-1321 [PMID: 27940470]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 26;108(30):12539-44 [PMID: 21737749]
  39. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 30;6:28941 [PMID: 27357749]
  40. Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Jun;115(1):35-46 [PMID: 17426956]
  41. BMC Genomics. 2012 Oct 03;13:524 [PMID: 23033915]
  42. Plant Cell. 2011 May;23(5):1795-814 [PMID: 21551388]
  43. Plant Cell. 2002 Aug;14(8):1919-35 [PMID: 12172031]
  44. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(2):225-34 [PMID: 18212027]
  45. Plant Cell. 2012 Jul;24(7):2898-916 [PMID: 22822206]
  46. Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):666-71 [PMID: 17637675]
  47. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 [PMID: 11846609]
  48. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5891-6 [PMID: 21436041]
  49. Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Jun;12(6):239-44 [PMID: 17499004]
  50. Plant Sci. 2016 Jun;247:104-14 [PMID: 27095404]
  51. Plant Cell. 2007 May;19(5):1665-81 [PMID: 17513501]
  52. BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Apr 14;16:86 [PMID: 27079791]
  53. Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;173(2):1475-1491 [PMID: 28062835]
  54. Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Apr;7(4):502-9 [PMID: 22499169]
  55. Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 08;5:5087 [PMID: 25295980]
  56. Plant Mol Biol. 2016 Aug;91(6):673-89 [PMID: 27086135]
  57. Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Oct;5(10):1318-20 [PMID: 20930557]
  58. Nat Methods. 2009 May;6(5):343-5 [PMID: 19363495]
  59. Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan;143(1):19-27 [PMID: 17210910]
  60. Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Oct;38(10):2157-70 [PMID: 25789569]
  61. Mol Plant. 2013 Nov;6(6):1975-83 [PMID: 23956122]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By