Single-Cell Transcriptomics of a Human Kidney Allograft Biopsy Specimen Defines a Diverse Inflammatory Response.

Haojia Wu, Andrew F Malone, Erinn L Donnelly, Yuhei Kirita, Kohei Uchimura, Sai M Ramakrishnan, Joseph P Gaut, Benjamin D Humphreys
Author Information
  1. Haojia Wu: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Departments of.
  2. Andrew F Malone: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Departments of.
  3. Erinn L Donnelly: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Departments of.
  4. Yuhei Kirita: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Departments of.
  5. Kohei Uchimura: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Departments of.
  6. Sai M Ramakrishnan: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Departments of.
  7. Joseph P Gaut: Pathology and Immunology and.
  8. Benjamin D Humphreys: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Departments of humphreysbd@wustl.edu. ORCID

Abstract

Single-cell genomics techniques are revolutionizing our ability to characterize complex tissues. By contrast, the techniques used to analyze renal biopsy specimens have changed little over several decades. We tested the hypothesis that single-cell RNA-sequencing can comprehensively describe cell types and states in a human kidney biopsy specimen. We generated 8746 single-cell transcriptomes from a healthy adult kidney and a single kidney transplant biopsy core by single-cell RNA-sequencing. Unsupervised clustering analysis of the biopsy specimen was performed to identify 16 distinct cell types, including all of the major immune cell types and most native kidney cell types, in this biopsy specimen, for which the histologic read was mixed rejection. Monocytes formed two subclusters representing a nonclassical CD16+ group and a classic CD16- group expressing dendritic cell maturation markers. The presence of both monocyte cell subtypes was validated by staining of independent transplant biopsy specimens. Comparison of healthy kidney epithelial transcriptomes with biopsy specimen counterparts identified novel segment-specific proinflammatory responses in rejection. Endothelial cells formed three distinct subclusters: resting cells and two activated endothelial cell groups. One activated endothelial cell group expressed Fc receptor pathway activation and Ig internalization genes, consistent with the pathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. We mapped previously defined genes that associate with rejection outcomes to single cell types and generated a searchable online gene expression database. We present the first step toward incorporation of single-cell transcriptomics into kidney biopsy specimen interpretation, describe a heterogeneous immune response in mixed rejection, and provide a searchable resource for the scientific community.

Keywords

References

  1. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:8746303 [PMID: 28255564]
  2. Semin Nephrol. 2018 Jan;38(1):31-39 [PMID: 29291760]
  3. Am J Transplant. 2009 Jan;9(1):169-78 [PMID: 18976290]
  4. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011 May;59(5):474-88 [PMID: 21430258]
  5. Immunol Res. 2006;34(2):97-115 [PMID: 16760571]
  6. Science. 2017 Oct 13;358(6360):194-199 [PMID: 28860209]
  7. Am J Transplant. 2016 Jul;16(7):1982-98 [PMID: 26990570]
  8. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Nov;15(8):302-8 [PMID: 16297768]
  9. Nat Protoc. 2015 Mar;10(3):442-58 [PMID: 25675209]
  10. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009 Dec;41(12):2422-30 [PMID: 19577661]
  11. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2520-31 [PMID: 19843030]
  12. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Dec;19(12):2254-61 [PMID: 18776124]
  13. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Sep;15(9):2429-39 [PMID: 15339992]
  14. Am J Transplant. 2013 Nov;13(11):2865-74 [PMID: 24119109]
  15. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004 Mar;19(2):166-9 [PMID: 15075746]
  16. J Immunol. 2007 Jun 15;178(12):7911-22 [PMID: 17548629]
  17. J Immunol. 2008 Feb 15;180(4):2357-66 [PMID: 18250445]
  18. Am J Transplant. 2009 Oct;9(10):2312-23 [PMID: 19681822]
  19. Am J Transplant. 2017 Oct;17(10):2659-2667 [PMID: 28332287]
  20. Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1202-1214 [PMID: 26000488]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 23;104(4):1301-6 [PMID: 17229850]
  22. Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 05;8:15663 [PMID: 28580927]
  23. Am J Transplant. 2014 Nov;14(11):2565-76 [PMID: 25219326]
  24. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Apr;17(4):932-42 [PMID: 16481411]
  25. Am J Transplant. 2013 Sep;13(9):2352-63 [PMID: 23915426]
  26. Int Immunol. 1998 Sep;10(9):1315-23 [PMID: 9786431]
  27. Kidney Int. 2004 Oct;66(4):1423-33 [PMID: 15458435]
  28. Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):758-763 [PMID: 29622724]
  29. Trends Immunol. 2002 Jun;23(6):273-5 [PMID: 12072358]
  30. Transplantation. 2005 Feb 15;79(3 Suppl):S19-21 [PMID: 15699739]
  31. Am J Transplant. 2009 Mar;9(3):527-35 [PMID: 19191769]
  32. Blood. 2010 Oct 21;116(16):e74-80 [PMID: 20628149]
  33. Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 16;8:14049 [PMID: 28091601]
  34. Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;36(5):411-420 [PMID: 29608179]
  35. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 20;7(1):6031 [PMID: 28729663]
  36. Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1187-1201 [PMID: 26000487]
  37. Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Dec;19(12):5490-505 [PMID: 18843053]
  38. Cell Rep. 2016 Sep 13;16(11):2953-2966 [PMID: 27626665]
  39. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 11;6:35108 [PMID: 27725773]
  40. Nat Methods. 2017 May;14(5):483-486 [PMID: 28346451]
  41. Development. 2017 Oct 1;144(19):3625-3632 [PMID: 28851704]
  42. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e70152 [PMID: 23922945]
  43. Cell Rep. 2015 Aug 25;12(8):1325-38 [PMID: 26279573]
  44. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Sep;25(9):1979-90 [PMID: 24652793]
  45. J Immunol. 2017 Mar 15;198(6):2374-2382 [PMID: 28167630]
  46. Lancet. 2016 Sep 3;388(10048):983-93 [PMID: 27452608]
  47. Transplantation. 2010 Jul 15;90(1):68-74 [PMID: 20463643]
  48. Am J Transplant. 2013 Apr;13(4):971-983 [PMID: 23414212]
  49. Cell Metab. 2017 Jun 6;25(6):1294-1304.e6 [PMID: 28479366]
  50. J Leukoc Biol. 2001 Nov;70(5):801-11 [PMID: 11698501]
  51. Am J Transplant. 2008 Mar;8(3):600-7 [PMID: 18294156]
  52. Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):388-99 [PMID: 22081892]
  53. J Immunol. 2008 Nov 15;181(10):6859-71 [PMID: 18981105]
  54. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012 Feb;17(1):20-5 [PMID: 22157320]

Grants

  1. U24 DK076169/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. U24 DK115255/NIDDK NIH HHS
  3. UH2 DK107374/NIDDK NIH HHS
  4. UH3 DK107374/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Allografts
Biomarkers
Biopsy, Needle
Cell Communication
Cluster Analysis
Gene Expression Profiling
Graft Rejection
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Kidney
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Kidney Transplantation
Male
Reference Values
Sequence Analysis, RNA
Transcriptome
Young Adult

Chemicals

Biomarkers