Borderline Personality Disorder in Adolescence as a Generalization of Disorganized Attachment.

Raphaële Miljkovitch, Anne-Sophie Deborde, Annie Bernier, Maurice Corcos, Mario Speranza, Alexandra Pham-Scottez
Author Information
  1. Raphaële Miljkovitch: Laboratoire Paragraphe EA 349, Paris 8 University, Saint-Denis, France.
  2. Anne-Sophie Deborde: Laboratoire Paragraphe EA 349, Paris 8 University, Saint-Denis, France.
  3. Annie Bernier: Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  4. Maurice Corcos: Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Inserm U 669, Faculty of Medecine, University René Descartes-Paris V, Paris, France.
  5. Mario Speranza: Inserm U 669, Faculty of Medecine, University René Descartes-Paris V, Paris, France.
  6. Alexandra Pham-Scottez: Inserm U 669, CMME, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France.

Abstract

Several researchers point to disorganized attachment as a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, recent studies suggest that specific internal working models (IWMs) of each parent combine to account for child outcomes and that a secure relationship with one parent can protect against the deleterious effects of an insecure relationship with the other parent. It was thus hypothesized that adolescents with BPD are more likely to be disorganized with both their parents, whereas non-clinical controls are more secure with at least one of their caregivers. Thirty-six adolescents with BPD and 30 control participants (aged 13-19) were included. Psychiatrist diagnosis was verified with the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SIDP-IV) and comorbidity was assessed using the Kiddie-SADS. Reported trauma was assessed with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Attachment IWMs of each parent were assessed with the Attachment Multiple Model Interview (AMMI), which enables separate coding for each attachment figure and in which disorganization is conceptualized as conflicting attachment strategies within a specific relationship. Results of a logistic regression analysis suggested that beyond insecure attachment, being disorganized not just with one but with both parents is particularly characteristic of adolescents with BPD. Conversely, belonging to the non-clinical group was predicted by higher security scores with the father and lower deactivation with the mother. Although higher levels of childhood abuse or neglect were reported by adolescents with BPD, the retained attachment dimensions predicted group membership over and above reported trauma. These findings have important implications for clinical intervention and highlight the protective role fathers may have.

Keywords

References

Early Hum Dev. 2013 May;89(5):349-54 [PMID: 23265254]
Child Dev. 2002 Nov-Dec;73(6):1715-26 [PMID: 12487489]
Dev Psychol. 2012 Sep;48(5):1381-1389 [PMID: 22390661]
Compr Psychiatry. 2003 Jul-Aug;44(4):284-92 [PMID: 12923706]
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Apr;64(2):244-53 [PMID: 8871408]
J Pers Disord. 2004 Apr;18(2):193-211 [PMID: 15176757]
Bull Menninger Clin. 1987 May;51(3):261-76 [PMID: 3580661]
Dev Psychol. 2010 Nov;46(6):1771-8 [PMID: 20873923]
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;56(12):1266-88 [PMID: 26251037]
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Fall;21(4):1311-34 [PMID: 19825270]
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 May;75(5):e457-64 [PMID: 24922498]
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;36(7):980-8 [PMID: 9204677]
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Apr 30;206(2-3):273-81 [PMID: 23123044]
Attach Hum Dev. 2005 Sep;7(3):299-311 [PMID: 16210241]
Brain Behav. 2016 Jun 09;6(7):e00480 [PMID: 27458544]
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Fall;17(4):899-925 [PMID: 16613424]
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Fall;9(4):679-700 [PMID: 9449001]
Attach Hum Dev. 2004 Jun;6(2):181-90 [PMID: 15370510]
Attach Hum Dev. 2011 Sep;13(5):451-69 [PMID: 21838646]
Int J Psychoanal. 2008 Jun;89(3):601-20 [PMID: 18558958]
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;154(8):1101-6 [PMID: 9247396]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4 [PMID: 12506264]
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):206-216 [PMID: 26986959]
Attach Hum Dev. 2007 Mar;9(1):1-16 [PMID: 17364479]
Hum Genomics. 2015 Jul 28;9:17 [PMID: 26216216]
Dev Psychol. 2006 Mar;42(2):293-304 [PMID: 16569168]
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012 Feb;14(1):45-53 [PMID: 22009682]
Psychopathology. 2013;46(1):55-62 [PMID: 22890504]
J Pers Disord. 2000 Fall;14(3):264-73 [PMID: 11019749]
J Soc Pers Relat. 2010 Jan 1;27(2):181-190 [PMID: 20431705]
Child Dev. 2013 Jan-Feb;84(1):283-96 [PMID: 23005703]
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2007 Fall;(117):23-39 [PMID: 17876787]
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;164(11):1637-40 [PMID: 17974925]
Attach Hum Dev. 2009 May;11(3):223-63 [PMID: 19455453]
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):467-78 [PMID: 19630069]
Infant Ment Health J. 2008;29(3):203-218 [PMID: 19122769]
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2014 Sep;79(3):36-50 [PMID: 25100088]
Attach Hum Dev. 2015;17(5):492-521 [PMID: 26325611]
J Genet Psychol. 1997 Dec;158(4):411-26 [PMID: 9423273]
Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(3):211-29 [PMID: 24605850]
Personal Disord. 2017 Apr;8(2):172-182 [PMID: 26691672]
Attach Hum Dev. 2010 Jan;12(1-2):3-141 [PMID: 20390524]
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Fall;9(4):855-79 [PMID: 9449009]
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1999;64(3):67-96; discussion 213-20 [PMID: 10597543]
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Summer;21(3):839-51 [PMID: 19583886]
Dev Psychopathol. 2006 Spring;18(2):309-43 [PMID: 16600057]
Child Dev. 1999 Jan-Feb;70(1):183-201 [PMID: 10191522]
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Feb;70(1):6-20 [PMID: 11860057]
Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jul;52(5):441-52 [PMID: 20583141]
J Pers Disord. 2008 Feb;22(1):22-41 [PMID: 18312121]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By