Phenology, mobility and behaviour of the arcto-alpine species Boloria napaea in its arctic habitat.

Stefan Ehl, Stephanie I J Holzhauer, Nils Ryrholm, Thomas Schmitt
Author Information
  1. Stefan Ehl: Biogeography, Trier University, D-54286, Trier, Germany. ehlst@outlook.com. ORCID
  2. Stephanie I J Holzhauer: Senckenberg German Entomological Institute, D-15374, Müncheberg, Germany.
  3. Nils Ryrholm: Department of Electronics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Gävle, SE-80176, Gävle, Sweden.
  4. Thomas Schmitt: Senckenberg German Entomological Institute, D-15374, Müncheberg, Germany.

Abstract

Arctic and alpine environments present extreme, but different, challenges to survival. We therefore studied the ecological adaptation of the arctic-alpine fritillary Boloria napaea in northern Sweden and compared these results with the eastern Alps. Using mark-release-recapture, we analysed phenology, mobility, activity patterns, change in wing condition and nectar sources. The phenology showed no protandry, but a longer flight period of the females. Wing conditions revealed a linear decay being quicker in males than females. The mean flight distances were higher for males than females (143 vs 92 m). In general, males were more flight active, while females invested more time in feeding and resting. The shortness of the flight period in the Arctic is apparently a particular adaptation to these harsh conditions, not even allowing protandry, and constraining all individuals to hatch during a short period. These conditions also forced the individuals to concentrate on flight and alimentation. In general, Arctic and Alpine populations of B. napaea show few differences, but the species seems to be even better adapted to the northern environments. Thus, the short temporal separation of these populations seems not to have been sufficient for a divergent adaptation in the southern mountains.

References

Mol Ecol. 2006 Sep;15(10):2921-33 [PMID: 16911211]
BMC Ecol. 2008 May 02;8:8 [PMID: 18454856]
Am J Bot. 2008 Aug;95(8):1006-14 [PMID: 21632421]
Oecologia. 2010 Dec;164(4):971-80 [PMID: 20652595]
Ecology. 2006 Apr;87(4):1057-65 [PMID: 16676549]
Mol Ecol. 2007 Jun;16(12):2542-59 [PMID: 17561912]
Oecologia. 2013 Jan;171(1):197-205 [PMID: 22744741]
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 13;10(11):e0142282 [PMID: 26566029]
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 20;7(1):331-345 [PMID: 28070296]
Oecologia. 1974 Dec;14(4):413-417 [PMID: 28308662]
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 7;268(1478):1791-6 [PMID: 11522197]
Insects. 2017 Jun 04;8(2): [PMID: 28587223]
Oecologia. 1982 Feb;52(2):164-166 [PMID: 28310501]
Am Nat. 2005 Apr;165(4):411-9 [PMID: 15791533]
Insect Sci. 2018 Dec;25(6):1089-1101 [PMID: 28618194]
Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(11):3269-86 [PMID: 16968270]
Insect Sci. 2018 Feb;25(1):161-171 [PMID: 27628710]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Physiological
Animal Distribution
Animals
Arctic Regions
Behavior, Animal
Butterflies
Ecosystem
Female
Male
Sex Characteristics

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By