Pod-shattering characteristics differences between two groups of soybeans are associated with specific changes in gene expression.

Xiang Kang, Jingjing Cai, Yexin Chen, Yuchuan Yan, Songtao Yang, Reqing He, Dong Wang, Youlin Zhu
Author Information
  1. Xiang Kang: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
  2. Jingjing Cai: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
  3. Yexin Chen: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
  4. Yuchuan Yan: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
  5. Songtao Yang: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
  6. Reqing He: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China.
  7. Dong Wang: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China. dongwang@ncu.edu.cn. ORCID
  8. Youlin Zhu: Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Gene Engineering in Jiangxi Province, College of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031, China. ylzhu1999@aliyun.com.

Abstract

Soybean is an economically important leguminous crop, and pod dehiscence of soybean could cause huge yield loss. In this study, we measured fruit-cracking forces and percentages of dehisced pods for ten soybean accessions, then separated them into two groups as shattering-sensitive (SS) and shattering-resistant (SR) soybeans. Pod transcriptomes from these two groups were analyzed, and 225 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between SS and SR soybeans. Some of these DEGs have been previously reported to be associated with pod dehiscence in soybean. The expression patterns of selected DEGs were validated by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR, which confirmed the expression changes found in RNA-seq analysis. We also de novo identified 246 soybean pod-long intergenic ncRNAs (lincRNAs), 401 intronic lncRNAs, and 23 antisense lncRNAs from these transcriptomes. Furthermore, genes and lincRNAs co-expression network analysis showed that there are distinct expression patterns between SS and SR soybeans in some co-expression modules. In conclusion, we systematically investigated potential genes and molecular pathways as candidates for differences in soybean pod dehiscence and will provide a useful resource for molecular breeding of soybeans.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Syst Biol. 2010 Feb 02;4:8 [PMID: 20122284]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 16;111(50):17797-802 [PMID: 25468966]
  3. Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):923-30 [PMID: 24227677]
  4. Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Jun;20(6):362-71 [PMID: 25850611]
  5. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 May;39(9):3864-78 [PMID: 21247874]
  6. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3352 [PMID: 24549030]
  7. Plant Cell Rep. 2017 Sep;36(9):1417-1426 [PMID: 28653111]
  8. BMC Genomics. 2018 May 9;19(Suppl 2):112 [PMID: 29764394]
  9. Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36 [PMID: 23618408]
  10. Plant Physiol. 2012 Jun;159(2):710-20 [PMID: 22496509]
  11. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D843-6 [PMID: 20008513]
  12. Cell. 2010 Oct 1;143(1):46-58 [PMID: 20887892]
  13. Nature. 2010 Jan 14;463(7278):178-83 [PMID: 20075913]
  14. Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 29;9(1):3516 [PMID: 30158538]
  15. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;119:63-109 [PMID: 27282024]
  16. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 27;8:649 [PMID: 28496452]
  17. Am J Bot. 2011 Sep;98(9):1389-414 [PMID: 21865506]
  18. Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jun 24;6:476 [PMID: 26157453]
  19. Breed Sci. 2012 Jan;61(5):554-8 [PMID: 23136494]
  20. Bioinformatics. 2000 Aug;16(8):707-26 [PMID: 11099257]
  21. New Phytol. 2017 Jul;215(1):173-186 [PMID: 28497532]
  22. Genome Biol Evol. 2014 May 27;6(6):1327-34 [PMID: 24868015]
  23. Plant J. 2017 Apr;90(1):133-146 [PMID: 28106309]
  24. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559 [PMID: 19114008]

Grants

  1. 20171ACB20001/Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
  2. 31401077/National Science Foundation of China
  3. 31800224/National Science Foundation of China

MeSH Term

Crops, Agricultural
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Gene Ontology
Genes, Plant
Oligonucleotides, Antisense
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Glycine max
Species Specificity
Stress, Mechanical
Transcriptome

Chemicals

Oligonucleotides, Antisense