Role of Bilingualism and Biculturalism as Assets in Positive Psychology: Conceptual Dynamic GEAR Model.

Xinjie Chen, Amado M Padilla
Author Information
  1. Xinjie Chen: Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  2. Amado M Padilla: Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Abstract

Are bilingualism and/or biculturalism good for a person's positive well being? A growing number of studies have shown different positive outcomes of being exposed to two cultures or speaking two languages respectively, but the benefits of being both bilingual and bicultural have rarely been investigated theoretically or empirically. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the main beneficial outcomes of bilingualism and biculturalism, and to integrate these benefits into a new conceptual framework: . The GEAR model suggests that the beneficial outcomes of bilingualism and biculturalism can be systematically classified into four positive dimensions (psychological rowth; cognitive xploration; linguistic wareness; and social einforcement), in which there are dynamic interactions among these four dimensions. The hypothetical GEAR model provides an intricate theoretical approach to understand the potential benefits to an individual of experiencing more than one language and one culture in their life. The proposed model in this research offers a systematic framework for conducting future research to examine whether bilingualism and biculturalism accrue benefits to the individual.

Keywords

References

Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Jan;17(1):43-51 [PMID: 21341896]
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):625-58 [PMID: 21674283]
Dev Sci. 2004 Jun;7(3):325-39 [PMID: 15595373]
Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):218-26 [PMID: 11315248]
Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2018;21(2):197-206 [PMID: 29755283]
J Psycholinguist Res. 1992 Jul;21(4):301-16 [PMID: 1403995]
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Mar;66(2):232-58 [PMID: 23370226]
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2009 Dec;10(3):89-129 [PMID: 26168404]
Int J Billing. 2019 Dec;23(6):1278-1290 [PMID: 34629935]
Child Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(2):555-67 [PMID: 20438460]
Psychol Bull. 1993 Nov;114(3):395-412 [PMID: 8272463]
J Pers. 2008 Jul;76(4):803-38 [PMID: 18482355]
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):5-14 [PMID: 11392865]
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Sep;103(3):520-42 [PMID: 22823287]
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):99-107 [PMID: 25475825]
Cognition. 2009 Sep;112(3):494-500 [PMID: 19615674]
Cognition. 1990 Jan;34(1):1-56 [PMID: 2302940]
Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):67-73 [PMID: 21906732]
Appl Psycholinguist. 2014 Jan 1;35(1):177-191 [PMID: 24744451]
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):250-263 [PMID: 28281208]
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):183-98 [PMID: 25416044]
J Pers. 2005 Aug;73(4):1015-49 [PMID: 15958143]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By