Influence factors on the critical micelle concentration determination using pyrene as a probe and a simple method of preparing samples.

Hao Li, Danna Hu, Feiqing Liang, Xiaowei Huang, Qiuhua Zhu
Author Information
  1. Hao Li: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, People's Republic of China.
  2. Danna Hu: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, People's Republic of China.
  3. Feiqing Liang: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, People's Republic of China.
  4. Xiaowei Huang: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, People's Republic of China.
  5. Qiuhua Zhu: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou 510515, People's Republic of China. ORCID

Abstract

The critical micelle concentration (CMC) is an important parameter of widely used surfactants and needs to be measured in the application and development of surfactants. Fluorometric method is a widely used method determining CMC values owing to the advantages of highly sensitivity, fast response and wide application range. There are two common methods (I and II) of preparing samples for CMC fluorometric determination. In the process of developing CMC probes with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) characteristics, we found that methods I and II were not suitable for CMC probes with AIE charateristics and developed a new sample preparation method (III), which is not only suitable for CMC probes with AIE characteristic but also decreases operation procedures and errors owing to omitting the addition of micro amount of dyes into each sample. To ascertain if method III is also suitable for other CMC probes without AIE characteristics, the CMC values of surfactants were determined by fluorometric method using widely used pyrene without AIE charateristic as probe and methods I-III to prepare samples. The obtained experimental results proved that method III not only was suitable for preparation of samples for CMC determination of surfactants using pyrene as probe but also led to the least average deviation (methods I-III led to ±0.13, ±0.34 and ±0.05 mM deviation for the CMC determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), respectively). The CMC determination using pyrene as probe is based on its change in the ratio ( / ) of its emission peaks I and III with surfactant concentration. Unexpectedly, it was found that the / value of pyrene in surfactant solutions is sensitive to the measurement conditions changing exciting light energy, such as slit widths and sample-measured number. In addition, it was found that surfactant SDS or cetrimonium bromide from different suppliers not only has significantly different CMC values but also leads to very different / values of pyrene in a certain concentration of surfactant, which can be used as a simple method to distinguish the same surfactant with different CMC values.

Keywords

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4862268

References

Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Oct 1;79:590-595 [PMID: 28629057]
J Fluoresc. 2018 Jan;28(1):465-476 [PMID: 29332160]
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Oct 9;56(42):13001-13005 [PMID: 28763581]
J Am Chem Soc. 2017 Apr 12;139(14):5125-5132 [PMID: 28301722]
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018 Feb;38(1):31-46 [PMID: 28427287]
Chem Commun (Camb). 2011 May 21;47(19):5527-9 [PMID: 21468398]
Chem Rev. 2015 Nov 11;115(21):11718-940 [PMID: 26492387]
Chem Commun (Camb). 2014 Feb 4;50(9):1107-9 [PMID: 24325002]
RSC Adv. 2018 Oct 23;8(63):36015-36024 [PMID: 35558498]
Anal Biochem. 1984 Jun;139(2):408-12 [PMID: 6476378]
Chem Soc Rev. 2017 Aug 14;46(16):5147-5172 [PMID: 28686247]
Bioconjug Chem. 2018 Jul 18;29(7):2296-2308 [PMID: 29856926]
RSC Adv. 2018 Feb 20;8(15):7969-7979 [PMID: 35542011]
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Nov 1;80:708-714 [PMID: 28866220]
Molecules. 2018 May 02;23(5): [PMID: 29724070]
Anal Chem. 2019 May 7;91(9):6003-6011 [PMID: 30916936]
Anal Chem. 2020 Mar 17;92(6):4259-4265 [PMID: 31710805]
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018 May 9;20(18):12688-12699 [PMID: 29697123]
Biomacromolecules. 2014 Feb 10;15(2):628-34 [PMID: 24432713]
Chem Commun (Camb). 2001 Sep 21;(18):1740-1 [PMID: 12240292]
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Nov 1;80:578-583 [PMID: 28866203]
Nanoscale. 2015 Jul 21;7(27):11486-508 [PMID: 26010238]
RSC Adv. 2018 Jun 5;8(36):20406-20410 [PMID: 35541675]
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Mar 21;140(11):4100-4109 [PMID: 29506382]
Analyst. 2018 Sep 21;143(18):4283-4289 [PMID: 30084447]
Chemistry. 2013 Jan 21;19(4):1268-80 [PMID: 23197318]
Drug Deliv. 2016;23(3):727-38 [PMID: 25013959]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By