Global strategy for New Psychoactive Substances: an update.

Balasingam Vicknasingam, Suresh Narayanan, Darshan Singh, Ornella Corazza
Author Information
  1. Balasingam Vicknasingam: Centre for Drug Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
  2. Suresh Narayanan: School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
  3. Darshan Singh: Centre for Drug Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
  4. Ornella Corazza: Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to provide an update on recent trends of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) and the current global strategies implemented to manage them.
RECENT FINDINGS: The number of NPS has increased from 166 in 2009 to 892 in 2018, with about 36% having stimulant effects. Such trend revels some unprecedented patterns. The decline in the emergence of new synthetic cannabinoids has coincided with rising deaths due to overdose of fentanyl and non-fentanyl compounds in North America and Europe. The detection of new stimulant NPS has stabilized since 2015. Although the level of seizures of mephedrone have risen since then, they are still below the levels reported before international control. The legal status of kratom still remains unclear, whereas calls for research on its benefits continue. The nonmedical use of tramadol in Africa and Middle East is a cause of growing concern.
SUMMARY: Although the rise of NPS is a cause for concern, evidence suggests that the strategy to face the challenge should include updating international data collection systems, integrating scientific-based interventions for drug use, strengthening national monitoring, and increasing collaborative research and forensic capabilities. The legal, regulatory framework and clinical guidelines should remain dynamic, whereas enforcement agencies should measure success by destroying drug networks as seizures rarely dismantle drug markets.

References

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/commissions/CND/index.html (Accessed 12 February 2020).
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Early Warning Advisory Toxicology Highlights. Current NPS Threats, Volume II, January 2020, 1–4.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Executive Summary, Conclusion and Policy Implications. World Drug Report, 2019 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.19.XI.8), 1–53.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Early Warning Advisory Toxicology Highlights. Current NPS Threats, Volume 1, March 2019, 1–2.
Prozialeck WC, Avery BA, Boyer EW, et al. Kratom policy: the challenge of balancing therapeutic potential with public safety. Int J Drug Policy 2019; 70:70–77.
Grafinger KE, Bernhard W, Weinmann W. Scheduling of new psychoactive substance the Swiss way: a review and critical analysis. Sci Justice 2019; 59:459–466.
Boff BD, Filho JS, Nonemacher K, et al. New psychoactive substances (NPS) prevalence over LSD in blotter seized in State of Santa Catarina, Brazil: a six-year retrospective study. Forensic Sci Int 2020; 306:110002.
Gol E, Cok I. New psychoactive substances in Turkey: narcotics cases assessed by the Council of Forensic Medicine between 2016 and 2017 in Ankara, Turkey. Forensic Sci Int 2019; 294:113–123.
Faro AF, Trana AD, Maida NL, et al. Biomedical analysis of new psychoactive substances (NPS) of natural origin. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2020; 179:112945.
Graziano S, Anzillotti L, Mannocchi G, et al. Screening methods for rapid determination of new psychoactive substances (NPS) in conventional and nonconventional biological matrices. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2019; 163:170–179.
Calderon FF, Cleland CM, Palamar JJ. Polysubstance use profiles among electronic dance music party attendees in New York City and their relations to use of new psychoactive substances. Addict Behav 2018; 78:85–93.
Sutherland R, Peacock A, Roxburgh A, et al. Typology of new psychoactive substance use among the general Australian population. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018; 188:126–134.
Rumorbarbe D, Morelato M, Staehli L, et al. Monitoring new psychoactive substances: exploring the contribution of an online discussion forum. Int J Drug Policy 2019; 73:273–280.
Grundmann O. Patterns of Kratom use and health impact in the US: results from an online survey. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 176:63–70.
Romeu AG, Cox DJ, Smith KE, et al. Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): user demographics, use patterns, and implications for the opioid epidemic. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020; 208:107849.
Rychert M, Wilkins C. A critical analysis of the implementation of a legal regulated market for new psychoactive substances (‘legal highs’) in New Zealand. Int J Drug Policy 2018; 55:88–94.
Soussan C, Andersso M, Kjellgren A. The diverse reasons for using novel psychoactive substances: a qualitative study of the users’ own perspectives. Int J Drug Policy 2018; 52:71–78.
Csak R, Szecsi J, Kassa S, et al. New psychoactive substance use as a survival strategy in rural marginalised communities in Hungary. Int J Drug Policy 2020 (In press) (102639).

MeSH Term

Humans
Illicit Drugs
International Cooperation
Legislation, Drug
Prescription Drug Misuse
Psychotropic Drugs
Substance-Related Disorders

Chemicals

Illicit Drugs
Psychotropic Drugs

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By