Impact of Drug-Gene-Interaction, Drug-Drug-Interaction, and Drug-Drug-Gene-Interaction on (es)Citalopram Therapy: The PharmLines Initiative.

Muh Akbar Bahar, Pauline Lanting, Jens H J Bos, Rolf H Sijmons, Eelko Hak, Bob Wilffert
Author Information
  1. Muh Akbar Bahar: Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Pauline Lanting: Department of Genetics, Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. Jens H J Bos: Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
  4. Rolf H Sijmons: Department of Genetics, Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
  5. Eelko Hak: Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
  6. Bob Wilffert: Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

We explored the association between CYP2C19/3A4 mediated drug-gene-interaction (DGI), drug-drug-interaction (DDI) and drug-drug-gene-interaction (DDGI) and (es)citalopram dispensing course. A cohort study was conducted among adult Caucasians from the Lifelines cohort (167,729 participants) and linked dispensing data from the IADB.nl database as part of the PharmLines Initiative. Exposure groups were categorized into (es)citalopram starters with DGI, DDI and DDGI. The primary outcome was drug switching and/or dose adjustment, and the secondary was early discontinuation after the start of (es)citalopram. Logistic regression modeling was applied to estimate adjusted odd ratios with their confidence interval. We identified 316 (es)citalopram starters with complete CYP2C19/3A4 genetic information. The CYP2C19 IM/PM and CYP3A4 NM combination increased risks of switching and/or dose reduction (OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.03-7.29). The higher effect size was achieved by the CYP2C19 IM/PM and CYP3A4 IM combination (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 1.22-15.69). CYP2C19/3A4 mediated DDIs and DDGIs showed trends towards increased risks of switching and/or dose reduction. In conclusion, a DGI involving predicted decreased CYP2C19 function increases the need for (es)citalopram switching and/or dose reduction which might be enhanced by co-presence of predicted decreased CYP3A4 function. For DDI and DDGI, no conclusions can be drawn from the results.

Keywords

References

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul;104(1):148-157 [PMID: 28940476]
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;103(3):399-401 [PMID: 29134625]
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 May;89(5):662-73 [PMID: 21412232]
Eur J Pharmacol. 2010 Jan 25;626(2-3):200-4 [PMID: 19840783]
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40 [PMID: 16390886]
Pharmacogenomics. 2017 May;18(7):701-739 [PMID: 28480783]
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 13;12(3):e0173530 [PMID: 28288183]
Pharmacogenetics. 1997 Feb;7(1):1-10 [PMID: 9110356]
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):101-8 [PMID: 16390896]
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):752-765 [PMID: 28345306]
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8142 [PMID: 28953649]
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Mar;71(3):196-204 [PMID: 11907494]
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 02;10(9):e0137203 [PMID: 26333164]
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Oct 02;24:14069 [PMID: 25274453]
Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 Aug;29(8):1102-9 [PMID: 11454728]
Per Med. 2016 Jan;13(1):5-8 [PMID: 29749863]
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;65(4):558-64 [PMID: 18070221]
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Oct;56(4):415-21 [PMID: 12968986]
P T. 2014 Sep;39(9):630-7 [PMID: 25210416]
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jan;66(1):61-6 [PMID: 19784640]
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014 Sep;53(9):801-11 [PMID: 25154506]
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 08;11:624 [PMID: 32457621]
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jan;50(1):62-72 [PMID: 19841156]
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;70(1):43-51 [PMID: 20642546]
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jan;19(1):33-7 [PMID: 19998397]
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Aug;98(2):127-34 [PMID: 25974703]
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Sep;60(3):287-90 [PMID: 16120067]
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2011 Jan;21(1):1-9 [PMID: 21192344]
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 May 1;175(5):463-470 [PMID: 29325448]
Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Jun;20(3):355-366 [PMID: 31792369]
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Dec;26 Suppl 2:211-9 [PMID: 18081664]
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Nov;66(11):1079-87 [PMID: 23067031]
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1172-80 [PMID: 25502107]
Pharmacogenomics. 2014 Apr;15(5):655-65 [PMID: 24798722]
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(1):67-74 [PMID: 18075776]
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012 Dec;15(4):171-8 [PMID: 23525835]
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;70(7):849-57 [PMID: 24793010]
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Jun;27(6):621-629 [PMID: 29575226]
Ther Drug Monit. 2015 Feb;37(1):90-7 [PMID: 24887634]
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Jun;13(3):285-92 [PMID: 23763527]
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2014 Nov;47(7):239-44 [PMID: 25372890]
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;55(6):591-5 [PMID: 12814454]
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 16;10:981-989 [PMID: 30147377]
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1982;6(3):311-8 [PMID: 6959195]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By