Accuracy Assessment of SUV Measurements in SPECT/CT: A Phantom Study.

Fatin Halim, Hizwan Yahya, Khairul Nizam Jaafar, Syahir Mansor
Author Information
  1. Fatin Halim: Oncological and Radiological Science Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, SAINS@BERTAM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  2. Hizwan Yahya: Oncological and Radiological Science Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, SAINS@BERTAM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  3. Khairul Nizam Jaafar: Nuclear Medicine Unit, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  4. Syahir Mansor: Oncological and Radiological Science Cluster, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, SAINS@BERTAM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia; syahir.mansor@usm.my.

Abstract

Advances in iterative image reconstruction enable absolute quantification of SPECT/CT studies by incorporating compensations for collimator-detector response, attenuation, and scatter. This study aimed to assess the quantitative accuracy of SPECT/CT based on different levels of Tc activity (low/high) using different SUV metrics (SUV, SUV, SUV, and SUV [the average values that include pixels greater than 60% and 75% of the SUV in the volume of interest, respectively]). A Jaszczak phantom equipped with 6 fillable spheres was set up with low and high activity ratios of 1:4 and 1:10 (background-to-sphere) on background activities of 10 and 60 kBq/mL, respectively. The fixed-size volume of interest based on the diameter of each sphere was drawn on SPECT images using various metrics for SUV quantification purposes. The convergence of activity concentration was dependent on the number of iterations and application of postfiltering. For the background-to-sphere ratio of 1:10 with a low background activity concentration, the SUV metric showed an underestimation of about 38% from the actual SUV, and SUV exhibited an overestimation of about 24% for the largest sphere diameter. Meanwhile, bias reductions of as much as -6% and -7% for SUV and SUV, respectively, were observed. SUV gave a more accurate reading than the others, although points that exceeded the actual value were detected. At 1:4 and 1:10 background activity of 10 kBq/mL, a low activity concentration attained a value close to the actual ratio. Use of 2 iterations and 10 subsets without postfiltering gave the most accurate values for reconstruction and the best image overall. SUV is the best metric in a high- or low-contrast-ratio phantom with at least 2 iterations, 10 subsets, and no postfiltering.

Keywords

References

Int J Biomed Imaging. 2011;2011:693795 [PMID: 21760768]
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):310-20 [PMID: 20651185]
Nucl Med Commun. 2000 Jul;21(7):685-90 [PMID: 10994673]
J Nucl Med. 2013 Jan;54(1):83-9 [PMID: 23283563]
World J Nucl Med. 2011 Jan;10(1):3-8 [PMID: 22034576]
World J Nucl Med. 2016 Sep;15(3):167-72 [PMID: 27650938]
Mol Imaging. 2003 Jul;2(3):131-7 [PMID: 14649056]
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):603-7 [PMID: 22320769]
Z Med Phys. 2012 Feb;22(1):58-69 [PMID: 21723716]
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Aug;43(9):1723-38 [PMID: 27262701]
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 May;38 Suppl 1:S69-77 [PMID: 21484383]
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):601-9 [PMID: 18218538]
J Nucl Med. 2007 Jun;48(6):932-45 [PMID: 17504879]
Semin Nucl Med. 2012 May;42(3):208-18 [PMID: 22475429]
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Feb;20(1):84-98 [PMID: 23151753]
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Sep;50(3):449-453 [PMID: 31320272]

MeSH Term

Phantoms, Imaging
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By