Difficult cannulation of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula - Role of imaging in access management (DICAF STUDY).

Manas Ranjan Behera, Elenjickal Elias John, Athul Thomas, Vinoi George David, Suceena Alexander, Anjali Mohapatra, Anna T Valson, Shibu Jacob, Shailesh Kakde, Pradeep Mathew Koshy, Gautam Rajan, Santosh Varughese
Author Information
  1. Manas Ranjan Behera: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India. ORCID
  2. Elenjickal Elias John: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India. ORCID
  3. Athul Thomas: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  4. Vinoi George David: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  5. Suceena Alexander: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India. ORCID
  6. Anjali Mohapatra: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  7. Anna T Valson: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  8. Shibu Jacob: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  9. Shailesh Kakde: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  10. Pradeep Mathew Koshy: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  11. Gautam Rajan: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India.
  12. Santosh Varughese: Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, India. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Difficulty in cannulation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) can lead to inadequate dialysis, transient to permanent loss of access and increases dependency on bridging catheters. This study aimed to analyze the causes for difficult fistula cannulation, using various imaging modalities.
METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective single-center observational study conducted between October 2017 and June 2018. Patients whose fistulae were difficult to cannulate were initially evaluated by physical examination followed by doppler ultrasonography or/and fistulogram as necessary. The patients were divided into two groups that is, primary difficult cannulation (within first three months of creation of fistula) or secondary difficult cannulation (after three months).
RESULTS: We encountered difficult cannulation in 43 patients. About 60% were primary difficult cannulations. Most common causes for difficulty in cannulation were cannulation zone (CZ) stenosis (23.3%), immature fistula (20.9%), outflow stenosis (18.6%), inflow stenosis (11.6%), anatomical abnormalities (11.6%), outflow plus CZ stenosis (9.3%) and inflow plus CZ stenosis (4.7%). Among patients with primary difficult cannulation, immature fistula (34.6%) was the most common cause, whereas CZ stenosis (47.1%) was the most common etiology for secondary difficult cannulation. Edema leading to difficult cannulation was found in 12 patients (27.9%), all of which was due to central vein stenosis. Cannulation resulted in hematoma, fistula thrombosis, failure of fistula and pseudoaneurysm in 83.7%, 27.9%, 16.3%, and 2.3% of cases respectively. Bridging temporary dialysis catheter placement was required in 67.4% patients. Ultrasound doppler had lower diagnostic value when compared to fistulogram (71.4% vs 93.9%,  = 0.014).
CONCLUSION: Difficulty in cannulating the arteriovenous fistula is a common problem in hemodialysis patients. We suggest that patients whose fistulae are difficult to cannulate should undergo early radiological evaluation to decrease catheter dependency and access failure.

Keywords

References

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Feb;19(2):309-11 [PMID: 14736952]
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jan;51(1):93-8 [PMID: 18155537]
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118 Suppl 1:c225-40 [PMID: 21555898]
Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;139(2):201-8 [PMID: 14769581]
Clin Kidney J. 2016 Feb;9(1):142-7 [PMID: 26798475]
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jul;48 Suppl 1:S176-247 [PMID: 16813989]
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;1(2):332-9 [PMID: 17699225]
Kidney Int. 2005 May;67(5):1986-92 [PMID: 15840048]
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Sep;38(3):439-45; discussion 445 [PMID: 12947249]
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016 Mar;33(1):31-8 [PMID: 27011425]
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun;28(6):1839-1850 [PMID: 28031406]
BMC Nephrol. 2019 May 31;20(1):197 [PMID: 31151432]
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Jan;15(1):204-9 [PMID: 14694174]
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Apr;37(4):821-6 [PMID: 12663983]
Kidney Int. 2003 Oct;64(4):1487-94 [PMID: 12969170]
Kidney Int. 2006 Oct;70(8):1413-22 [PMID: 16883317]
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep;2(5):1043-53 [PMID: 17702726]
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2016 Sep 27;3:2054358116669126 [PMID: 28270918]
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Apr;75(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164 [PMID: 32778223]
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Nov;17(11):3204-12 [PMID: 16988062]
Hemodial Int. 2009 Oct;13(4):498-504 [PMID: 19840142]
BMC Nephrol. 2012 Aug 23;13:88 [PMID: 22916962]
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;51(1):134-40 [PMID: 26775626]
Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(3):220-8 [PMID: 23128647]
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;22(6):438-45 [PMID: 26524948]
Clin Kidney J. 2015 Jun;8(3):278-81 [PMID: 26034588]

Grants

  1. IA/CPHS/22/1/506541/DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance

MeSH Term

Humans
Retrospective Studies
Constriction, Pathologic
Catheterization
Renal Dialysis
Arteriovenous Fistula
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By