Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Spinal Bone Metastases.

Jianpo Zhai, Ning Liu, Hai Wang, Guanglin Huang, Libo Man
Author Information
  1. Jianpo Zhai: Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
  2. Ning Liu: Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
  3. Hai Wang: Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
  4. Guanglin Huang: Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
  5. Libo Man: Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with spinal bone metastasis (sBM) varies greatly. In this study, we aimed to define the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of RCC with spinal bone metastasis (sBM) in our center.
METHODS: The clinical and medical records of RCC patients with sBMs were collected. The gender, age, time of BM, the extent of BM, the number of BMs, the presence or absence of visceral metastasis, and the pathological type of BM were investigated. All patients were followed up regularly. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of BMs diagnosis to death or last follow-up using Kaplan-Meier method and modelled with Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Forty-three RCC patients with sBM were collected. sBM was found synchronously in 30 patients (70%) and metachronously in 13 patients (30%). The median survival time was 30 months in 13 patients (30%) with solitary sBM and 19 months in 30 patients (70%) with multiple sBMs ( = 0.002). Visceral metastasis occurred in 12 patients (28%) with the median survival time of 17 months, while the other 31 patients (72%) had no visceral metastasis with the median survival time of 29 months (<0.001). En-block resection was done in 10 patients with median survival time of 40.1 months. Non-en-block resection were done in 33 patients with median survival time of 19.7 months (<0.001). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that MSKCC score, number of BM, visceral metastasis, and en-block resection are the independent prognosis factors of RCC patients with sBM.
CONCLUSIONS: MSKCC risk stratification, number of sBM, visceral metastasis and en-block resection are significant prognostic factors for OS in RCC patients with spinal BM. Therefore, for selected patients who has solitary spinal BM with no visceral metastasis, en-block resection of spinal BM can potentially prolong survival and is the treatment of choice.

Keywords

References

Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):387-393 [PMID: 29880274]
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Nov;18(11):1135-1143 [PMID: 30183421]
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):973-80 [PMID: 21890909]
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1886-1896 [PMID: 31317187]
Eur Urol. 2021 Mar;79(3):339-342 [PMID: 33357997]
Eur Urol. 2021 Apr 3;: [PMID: 33824031]
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):163-8 [PMID: 17098353]
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):519-30 [PMID: 25449206]
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jan;36(1):15-16 [PMID: 29198585]
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2011 Apr;28(4):405-11 [PMID: 21365325]
Cancer Sci. 2012 Sep;103(9):1695-700 [PMID: 22642767]
Lancet. 2016 Feb 27;387(10021):894-906 [PMID: 26318520]
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:79-85 [PMID: 30551078]
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;114(2):237-45 [PMID: 27156495]
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2246-2254 [PMID: 27718781]
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jan;20(1):108-16 [PMID: 24206037]
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;113(5):587-92 [PMID: 26846902]
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):577-84 [PMID: 23962746]
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Nov;26(6):566-72 [PMID: 27471993]
Future Oncol. 2014 Jun;10(8):1361-72 [PMID: 25052747]
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:28-35 [PMID: 30144592]
Urol Oncol. 2016 Oct;34(10):433.e1-8 [PMID: 27321354]
J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1611-4 [PMID: 21419440]
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 27;12(4): [PMID: 32230921]
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016 Oct;33(7):699-705 [PMID: 27316704]
Anticancer Drugs. 2013 Jun;24(5):431-40 [PMID: 23511427]
Eur Urol. 2019 Jan;75(1):74-84 [PMID: 30243799]
Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1232-1241 [PMID: 30776487]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By