Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.
Ahn, W. Y., Kishida, K. T., Gu, X., Lohrenz, T., Harvey, A., Alford, J. R., Smith, K. B., Yaffe, G., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2014). Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Current Biology, 24(22), 2693–2699.
Alexander, J. K., Hillier, A., Smith, R. M., Tivarus, M. E., & Beversdorf, D. Q. (2007). Beta-adrenergic modulation of cognitive flexibility during stress. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(3), 468–478.
Alquist, J. L., Baumeister, R. F., McGregor, I., Core, T. J., Benjamin, I., & Tice, D. M. (2018). Personal conflict impairs performance on an unrelated self-control task: Lingering costs of uncertainty and conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 157–160.
Arceneaux, K., Dunaway, J., & Soroka, S. (2018). Elites are people, too: The effects of threat sensitivity on policymakers' spending priorities. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0193781.
Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Meridian.
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.
Baker, M., & Haas, I. J. (2020, October26). Biological attributions for political ideology decrease political prejudice and intolerance. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pkjh7
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 613–621.
Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34.
Batrićević, N., & Littvay, L. (2017). A genetic basis of economic egalitarianism. Social Justice Research, 30(4), 408–437.
Benhabib, S. (2003). The reluctant modernism of Hannah Arendt. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 453–462.
Blass, T. (1991). Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(3), 398.
Blix, E., Perski, A., Berglund, & Savic, I. (2013). Long-term occupational stress is associated with regional reductions in brain tissue volumes. PLOS ONE, 8(6), e64065.
Borghol, N., Suderman, M., McArdle, W., Racine, A., Hallett, M., Pembrey, M., … & Szyf, M. (2012). Associations with early-life socio-economic position in adult DNA methylation. International journal of epidemiology, 41(1), 62–74.
Boyke, J., Driemeyer, J., Gaser, C., Buchel, C., & May, A. (2008). Training-induced brain structure changes in the elderly. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 7031–7035.
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. John Wiley & Sons.
Canovan, M. (1994). Hannah Arendt: A reinterpretation of her political thought. Cambridge University Press.
Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: Joining forces with neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(7), 583–590.
Chang, L. W., Krosch, A. R., & Cikara, M. (2016). Effects of intergroup threat on mind, brain, and behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 69–73.
Colzato, L. S., Hommel, B., van den Wildenberg, W. P., & Hsieh, S. (2010). Buddha as an eye opener: A link between prosocial attitude and attentional control. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 156.
Colzato, L. S., van Beest, I., van den Wildenberg, W. P., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., Borghi, A. M., & Hommel, B. (2010). God: Do I have your attention? Cognition, 117(1), 87–94.
Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W. P., & Hommel, B. (2008). Losing the big picture: How religion may control visual attention. PLOS ONE, 3(11), e3679.
Connors, M. H., & Halligan, P. W. (2015). A cognitive account of belief: A tentative road map. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1588.
Creswell, J. D., Taren, A. A., Lindsay, E. K., Greco, C. M., Gianaros, P. J., Fairgrieve, A., Marsland, A. L., Brown, K. W., Way, B. M., Rosen, R. K., & Ferris, J. L. (2016). Alterations in resting state functional connectivity link mindfulness meditation with reduced interleukin-6: A randomized controlled trial. Biological Psychiatry, 80(1), 53–61.
Cristofori, I., Bulbulia, J., Shaver, J. H., Wilson, M., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2016). Neural correlates of mystical experience. Neuropsychologia, 80, 212–220.
Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10(5), 191–198.
Dawes, C. T., & Weinschenk, A. C. (2020). On the genetic basis of political orientation. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 173–178.
Decety, J., Pape, R., & Workman, C. I. (2018). A multilevel social neuroscience perspective on radicalization and terrorism. Social Neuroscience, 13(5), 511–529.
den Ouden, H. E., Kok, P., & De Lange, F. P. (2012). How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 548.
Dijksterhuis, A. P., Van Knippenberg, A. D., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schaper, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(3), 254–270.
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018). Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 256–298.
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–312.
Essex, M. J., Thomas Boyce, W., Hertzman, C., Lam, L. L., Armstrong, J. M., Neumann, S. M., & Kobor, M. S. (2013). Epigenetic vestiges of early developmental adversity: childhood stress exposure and DNA methylation in adolescence. Child Development, 84(1), 58–75.
Everson-Rose, S. A., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Bienias, J. L., Wilson, R. S., & Evans, D. A. (2003). Early life conditions and cognitive functioning in later life. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158(11), 1083–1089.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57(5), 271–282.
Festinger, L. (1954). Motivations leading to social behavior. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1954 (pp. 191–219). University of Nebraska Press.
Fischer, H., Amelung, D., & Said, N. (2019). The accuracy of German citizens' confidence in their climate change knowledge. Nature Climate Change, 9(10), 776–780.
Fowler, J. H., Baker, L. A., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 233–248.
Friedman, E. M., Karlamangla, A. S., Gruenewald, T., Koretz, B., & Seeman, T. E. (2015). Early life adversity and adult biological risk profiles. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(2), 176–185.
Friesen, A., Gruszczynski, M., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2020). Political attitudes vary with detection of androstenone. Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(1), 26–37.
Good, M., Inzlicht, M., & Larson, M. J. (2015). God will forgive: Reflecting on God's love decreases neurophysiological responses to errors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(3), 357–363.
Goudarzi, S., Pliskin, R., Jost, J. T., & Knowles, E. D. (2020). Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–9.
Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30–37.
Gruenewald, T. L., Karlamangla, A. S., Hu, P., Stein-Merkin, S., Crandall, C., Koretz, B., & Seeman, T. E. (2012). History of socioeconomic disadvantage and allostatic load in later life. Social Science & Medicine, 74(1), 75–83.
Haas, I. J., Baker, M. N., & Gonzalez, F. J. (2017). Who can deviate from the party line? Political ideology moderates evaluation of incongruent policy positions in insula and anterior cingulate cortex. Social Justice Research, 30(4), 355–380.
Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2014). The uncertainty paradox: Perceived threat moderates the effect of uncertainty on political tolerance. Political Psychology, 35(2), 291–302.
Haas, I. J., Warren, C., & Lauf, S. J. (2020, January30). Political neuroscience: Understanding how the brain makes political decisions. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kvzcf
Hagan, M. J., Roubinov, D. S., Adler, N. E., Boyce, W. T., & Bush, N. R. (2016). Socioeconomic adversity, negativity in the parent child-relationship, and physiological reactivity: An examination of pathways and interactive processes affecting young children's physical health. Psychosomatic Medicine, 78 (9), 998–1007.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2017). 50 years of “obedience to authority”: From blind conformity to engaged followership. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 59–78.
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121.
Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012a). The genetics of politics: Discovery, challenges, and progress. Trends in Genetics, 28(10), 525–533.
Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012b). A neurobiological approach to foreign policy analysis: Identifying individual differences in political violence. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(2), 111–129.
Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Eaves, L. J., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2013). Fear as a disposition and an emotional state: A genetic and environmental approach to out-group political preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 279–293.
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., Oskarsson, S., Littvay, L., Dawes, C., Verhulst, B., McDermott, R., Nørgaard, A. S., Klofstad, C., Christensen, K., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. K. E., Eaves, L. J., & Martin, N. G. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavior Genetics, 44(3), 282–294.
Hein, G., Engelmann, J. B., & Tobler, P. N. (2018). Pain relief provided by an outgroup member enhances analgesia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1887), 20180501.
Heyes, C., Bang, D., Shea, N., Frith, C. D., & Fleming, S. M. (2020). Knowing ourselves together: The cultural origins of metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 349–362.
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–307.
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., Peterson, J. C., & Feher, B. (2014). The deeper sources of political conflict: Evidence from the psychological, cognitive, and neuro-sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 111–113.
Hill, P. C., & Williamson, W. P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism. Guilford Press.
Hölzel, B.K., Carmody, J., Evans, K.C., Hoge, E.A., Dusek, J. A., Morgan, L., Pitman, R.K., & Lazar, S.W. (2009). Stress reduction correlates with structural changes in the amygdala. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(1), 11–17.
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: On the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon, 45(3), 596–604.
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2017). The social transmission of metacontrol policies: mechanisms underlying the interpersonal transfer of persistence and flexibility. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Part A), 43–58.
Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. (2011). Religion and action control: Faith-specific modulation of the Simon effect but not stop-signal performance. Cognition, 120(2), 177–185.
Hughes, B. L., Camp, N. P., Gomez, J., Natu, V. S., Grill-Spector, K., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2019). Neural adaptation to faces reveals racial outgroup homogeneity effects in early perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(29), 14532–14537.
Hyman, H. (1959). Political socialization. Free Press.
Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20(3), 385–392.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., & Good, M. (2011). The need to believe: a neuroscience account of religion as a motivated process. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(3), 192–212.
Israel, S., Hasenfratz, L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). The genetics of morality and prosociality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 55–59.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.
Jost, J. T., Nam, H. H., Amodio, D. M., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Political neuroscience: The beginning of a beautiful friendship. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 3–42.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.
Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21(8), 677–680.
Kaplan, G. A., Turrell, G., Lynch, J. W., Everson, S. A., Helkala, E. L., & Salonen, J. T. (2001). Childhood socioeconomic position and cognitive function in adulthood. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(2), 256–263.
Kleitman, S., Hui, J. S. W., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Confidence to spare: individual differences in cognitive and metacognitive arrogance and competence. Metacognition and Learning, 14(3), 479–508.
Krosch, A. R., & Amodio, D. M. (2019). Scarcity disrupts the neural encoding of Black faces: A socioperceptual pathway to discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 859–875.
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35(Suppl. 1), 69–93.
Ksiazkiewicz, A., & Krueger, R. F. (2017). The role of genes and environments in linking the need to evaluate with political ideology and political extremity. Social Justice Research, 30(4), 381–407.
Ksiazkiewicz, A., Ludeke, S., & Krueger, R. (2016). The role of cognitive style in the link between genes and political ideology. Political Psychology, 37(6), 761–776.
Lassiter, G. D., Briggs, M. A., & Slaw, R. D. (1991). Need for cognition, causal processing, and memory for behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(6), 694–700.
Leong, Y. C., Radulescu, A., Daniel, R., DeWoskin, V., & Niv, Y. (2017). Dynamic interaction between reinforcement learning and attention in multidimensional environments. Neuron, 93(2), 451–463.
Leong, Y. C., Chen, J., Willer, R., & Zaki, J. (2020). Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(44), 27731–27739.
Lewkowicz, D. J., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). The emergence of multisensory systems through perceptual narrowing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(11), 470–478.
Locke, E. (2000). Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 408–429.
Lupien, S. J., Maheu, F., Tu, M., Fiocco, A., & Schramek, T. E. (2007). The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: Implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 65(3), 209–237.
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Rackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(8), 4398–4403.
Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Conformity and independence in groups: Majorities and minorities. In M. A. Hogg & R.S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (pp. 209–234). Blackwell Publishers.
McEwen, B. S. (2012). Brain on stress: how the social environment gets under the skin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Suppl. 2), 17180–17185.
McGregor, I., Nash, K., Mann, N., & Phills, C. E. (2010). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation (RAM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 133–147.
McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 472–488.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper & Row.
Molenberghs, P., & Louis, W. R. (2018). Insights from fMRI studies into ingroup bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1868.
Morris, M. W., Savani, K., & Fincher, K. (2019). Metacognition fosters cultural learning: Evidence from individual differences and situational prompts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(1), 46–68.
Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., & Feldman, S. (2017). The neurobiology of fairness and social justice: An introduction. Social Justice Research, 30(4), 289–299.
Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., Kaggen, L., Campbell-Meiklejohn, D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2018). Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(2), 133–138.
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322(5898), 58–62.
Oskarsson, S., Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. K., & Teorell, J. (2015). Linking genes and political orientations: Testing the cognitive ability as mediator hypothesis. Political Psychology, 36(6), 649–665.
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., Hatemi, P. K., & Hibbing, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670.
Paglieri, F., Borghi, A. M., Colzato, L. S., Hommel, B., & Scorolli, C. (2013). Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting. Psychological Research, 77(6), 738–747.
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 1–10.
Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160–166.
Pessoa, L., & Engelmann, J. B. (2010). Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 17.
Plessow, F., Fischer, R., Kirschbaum, C., & Goschke, T. (2011). Inflexibly focused under stress: Acute psychosocial stress increases shielding of action goals at the expense of reduced cognitive flexibility with increasing time lag to the stressor. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3218–3227.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2018). Temperament and brain networks of attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), 20170254.
Richins, M. T., Barreto, M., Karl, A., & Lawrence, N. (2019). Empathic responses are reduced to competitive but not noncompetitive outgroups. Social Neuroscience, 14(3), 345–358.
Robbins, T. W., & Costa, R. M. (2017). Habits. Current Biology, 27(22), R1200–R1206.
Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2018). Metacognitive failure as a feature of those holding radical beliefs. Current Biology, 28(24), 4014–4021.
Rollwage, M., Zmigrod, L., de-Wit, L., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2019). What underlies political polarization? A manifesto for computational political psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 820–822.
Sale, A., Berardi, N., & Maffei, L. (2014). Environment and brain plasticity: towards an endogenous pharmacotherapy. Physiological Reviews, 94(1), 189–234.
Sallis, H., Smith, G. D., & Munafo, M. R. (2018). Genetics of biologically based psychological differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), 20170162.
Schoofs, D., Preuß, D., & Wolf, O. T. (2008). Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(5), 643–653.
Schreiber, D., Fonzo, G., Simmons, A. N., Dawes, C. T., Flagan, T., Fowler, J. H., & Paulus, M. P. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLOS ONE, 8(2), e52970.
Shils, E. (1958). Ideology and Civility: On the Politics of the Intellectual. Sewanee Review, 66(3), 450–480.
Sinclair, A. H., Stanley, M., & Seli, P., Ph.D. (2019, December 21). Closed-minded cognition: Right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/94a7v
Smith, K. B., & Warren, C. (2020). Physiology predicts ideology. Or does it? The current state of political psychophysiology research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 88–93.
Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews, 12(6), 264–274.
Springer, K. W., Sheridan, J., Kuo, D., & Carnes, M. (2007). Long-term physical and mental health consequences of childhood physical abuse: Results from a large population-based sample of men and women. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(5), 517–530.
Suhay, E., Brandt, M. J., & Proulx, T. (2017). Lay belief in biopolitics and political prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 173–182.
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 434–449.
Thórisdóttir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32(5), 785–811.
Trofimova, I. (2016). The interlocking between functional aspects of activities and a neurochemical model of adult temperament. In M. C. Arnold (Ed.), Temperaments: Individual differences, social and environmental influences and impact on quality of life (pp. 77–147). Nova Science.
Trofimova, I., & Robbins, T. W. (2016). Temperament and arousal systems: a new synthesis of differential psychology and functional neurochemistry. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 64, 382–402.
Trofimova, I., Robbins, T. W., Sulis, W. H., & Uher, J. (2018). Taxonomies of psychological individual differences: Biological perspectives on millennia-long challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), 20170152.
Twito, L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2020). Beyond culture and the family: Evidence from twin studies on the genetic and environmental contribution to values. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 135–143.
Uher, J. (2018). Taxonomic models of individual differences: a guide to transdisciplinary approaches. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), 20170171.
van Elk, M., & Aleman, A. (2017). Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 73, 359–378.
van Prooijen, J. W., & Acker, M. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 753–761.
van Prooijen, J. W., Douglas, K. M., & De Inocencio, C. (2018). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 320–335.
Verplanken, B. (1993). Need for cognition and external information search: Responses to time pressure during decision-making. Journal of Research in Personality, 27(3), 238–252.
Villa, D. (Ed.). (2000). The Cambridge companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Wickrama, K. A. S., Conger, R. D., & Abraham, W. T. (2005). Early adversity and later health: The intergenerational transmission of adversity through mental disorder and physical illness. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60, S125–S129.
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Zhong, W., Cristofori, I., Bulbulia, J., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2017). Biological and cognitive underpinnings of religious fundamentalism. Neuropsychologia, 100, 18–25.
Zmigrod, L. (2020a). A psychology of ideology: Unpacking the psychological structure of ideological thinking. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ewy9t
Zmigrod, L. (2020b). The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: theory, evidence, and future directions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 34–39.
Zmigrod, L., Eisenberg, I., Bissett, P., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. (2021). The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: A data-driven approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), 20200424.
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2018). Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4532–E4540.
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2019). Cognitive inflexibility predicts extremist attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 989.
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 407–418.
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., Zmigrod, S., & Robbins, T. W. (2019). Cognitive flexibility and religious disbelief. Psychological Research, 83(8), 1749–1759.
Zmigrod, L., & Tsakiris, M. (2021). Computational and neurocognitive approaches to the political brain: Key insights and future avenues for political neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), 20200130.
Zmigrod, L., Zmigrod, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2019). The psychological roots of intellectual humility: The role of intelligence and cognitive flexibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 200–208.
Zmigrod, L., & Goldenberg, A. (2021). Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421993820.
