Cancer Premature Mortality Costs in Europe in 2020: A Comparison of the Human Capital Approach and the Friction Cost Approach.

Paul Hanly, Marta Ortega-Ortega, Isabelle Soerjomataram
Author Information
  1. Paul Hanly: School of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin 1, Ireland.
  2. Marta Ortega-Ortega: Department of Applied Economics, Public Economics and Political Economy, Faculty of Economics and Business, Complutense University of Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, 28223 Madrid, Spain.
  3. Isabelle Soerjomataram: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372 Lyon, France.

Abstract

The inclusion of productivity costs can affect the outcome of cost-effectiveness analyses. We estimated the value of cancer premature mortality productivity costs for Europe in 2020 using the Human Capital Approach (HCA) and compared these to the Friction Cost Approach (FCA). Cancer mortality data were obtained from GLOBOCAN 2020 by sex and five-year age groups. Twenty-three cancer sites for 31 European countries were included. The HCA and the FCA were valued using average annual gross wages by sex and age group and applied to Years of Potential Productive Life Lost. 2020 friction periods were calculated and all costs were in 2020 euros. Estimated cancer premature mortality costs for Europe in 2020 were EUR 54.0 billion (HCA) and EUR 1.57 billion (FCA). The HCA/FCA cost ratio for Europe was 34.4, but considerable variation arose across countries (highest in Ireland: 64.5 v lowest in Czech Republic: 11.1). Both the HCA and the FCA ranked lung, breast and colorectal as the top three most costly cancers in Europe, but cost per death altered rankings substantially. Significant cost differences were observed following sensitivity analysis. Our study provides a unique perspective of the difference between HCA and FCA estimates of productivity costs by cancer site and country in Europe.

Keywords

References

Gac Sanit. 2015 May-Jun;29(3):178-83 [PMID: 25869153]
Int J Cancer. 2022 Feb 15;150(4):580-593 [PMID: 34569617]
J Health Econ. 1997 Apr;16(2):249-55; discussion 257-9 [PMID: 10173080]
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Jan;39(1):81-97 [PMID: 33230613]
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;264:113289 [PMID: 32836019]
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jun;17(5):553-61 [PMID: 26022915]
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):429-36 [PMID: 22583452]
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Apr;129:41-49 [PMID: 32120274]
Int J Cancer. 2015 Feb 15;136(4):E136-45 [PMID: 25066804]
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):171-89 [PMID: 10154656]
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13(4):359-67 [PMID: 25691128]
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):31-44 [PMID: 25387561]
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Jun;14(3):355-77 [PMID: 24746223]
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jul;31(7):537-49 [PMID: 23620213]
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(5):449-59 [PMID: 15896097]
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):765-778 [PMID: 30094591]
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 May;17(4):391-402 [PMID: 25876834]
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 1):1-7 [PMID: 10175982]
Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Dec;6(4):309-13 [PMID: 16133097]

Grants

  1. 001/World Health Organization

MeSH Term

Cost of Illness
Europe
Friction
Humans
Mortality, Premature
Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By