Inconsistent flanker congruency effects across stimulus types and age groups: A cautionary tale.

Vanessa R Simmering, Chelsea M Andrews, Rebecca Leuenberger, Kristine A Kovack-Lesh
Author Information
  1. Vanessa R Simmering: Psychology Department and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  2. Chelsea M Andrews: Psychology Department and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  3. Rebecca Leuenberger: Psychology Department, Ripon College, 300 W. Seward St, Ripon, WI, 54971, USA.
  4. Kristine A Kovack-Lesh: Psychology Department, Ripon College, 300 W. Seward St, Ripon, WI, 54971, USA. kovack-leshk@ripon.edu.

Abstract

The flanker task is a common measure of selective attention and response competition across populations, age groups, and experiential contexts. Adapting it for different uses often involves changing methodological features that are rarely empirically compared with the previous design. This paper presents an example of how typical methodological changes can differentially elicit congruency effects across age groups. We compared two flanker tasks, using direction stimuli on a laptop versus color stimuli on a tablet, in young children (2-7 years; Experiment 1), older children (6-10 years; Experiment 2a), and adults (19-23 years; Experiment 2b). Young children showed the expected congruency effects in the direction task, and one year later a subset of the sample completed the color task, also showing congruency effects. Longitudinal comparisons showed no difference in the congruency effect across tasks, but nearly half of the sample was excluded due to high error rates. To avoid excluding children with few correct trials, we modified a new measure, signed residual time, to incorporate correctness and reaction time per trial. With the larger sample, this measure showed no difference in congruency effects across tasks. To compare these tasks when completed within the same session, we tested older children and young adults in both tasks and found congruency effects in the direction task but not the color task. These results raise concern that tasks adapted for young children may not perform comparably in other samples, and we caution researchers to anticipate this possibility when modifying cognitive tasks.

Keywords

References

Akhtar, N., & Enns, J.T. (1989). Relations between convert orienting and filtering in the development of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(89)90008-8 . [DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(89)90008-8]
Andrews, C. M., Coates, E., Kovack-Lesh, K. A., & Simmering, V. R. (2018, July). Predicting preschool-aged children’s behavior regulation from attention tasks in the lab. Presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, London, UK. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15731.14888/1
Anwyl-Irvine, A.L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x [DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x]
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
Best, J. R. (2012). Exergaming immediately enhances children’s executive function. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026648 [DOI: 10.1037/a0026648]
Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Blaye, A., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2010). Word mapping and executive functioning in young monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.516420 [DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2010.516420]
Brauer, M., & Curtin, J. J. (2018). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159 [DOI: 10.1037/met0000159]
Brosowsky, N. P., & Crump, M. J. C. (2018). Memory-guided selective attention: Single experiences with conflict have long-lasting effects on cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1134–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000431 [DOI: 10.1037/xge0000431]
Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic N. M., Thomason M. E., Vaidya C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children. Neuron, 33(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00583-9
Chang, Y.K., Tsai, Y.J., Chen, T.T., & Hung, T.M. (2013). The impacts of coordinative exercise on executive function in kindergarten children: An ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 225, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3360-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3360-9]
Clark, M. (2020). Michael Clark: Convergence Problems. Retrieved from  https://mclark.github.io/posts/2020-03-16-convergence/ . Accessed 21 March 2022
Cochrane, A., Simmering, V., & Green, C. S. (2021). Modulation of compatibility effects in response to experience: Two tests of initial and sequential learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 837–852. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02181-1 [DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02181-1]
Conover, W. (1999). Some tests based on the binomial distribution. Practical Nonparametric Statistics (3rd ed.pp. 123–178). Wiley.
Davies, P.L., Segalowitz, S.J., & Gavin, W.J. (2004). Development of response-monitoring ERPs in 7- to 25-year-olds. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2503_6 [DOI: 10.1207/s15326942dn2503_6]
Davranche, K., Hall, B., & McMorris, T. (2009). Effect of acute exercise on cognitive control required during an Eriksen flanker task. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.5.628 [DOI: 10.1123/jsep.31.5.628]
Dessalegn, B., & Landau, B. (2008). More than meets the eye: The role of language in binding and maintaining feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 19, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02066.x [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02066.x]
Di Martino, A., Ghaffari, M., Curchack, J., Reiss, P., Hyde, C., Vannucci, M., … Castellanos, F. X. (2008). Decomposing intra-subject variability in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 64, 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.008
Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R. B., Cohen, A., & Danziger, S. (2000). Asymmetries in a unilateral flanker task depend on the direction of the response: The role of attentional shift and perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.113 [DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.113]
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
Enns, J. T., & Akhtar, N. (1989). A developmental study of filtering in visual attention. Child Development, 60, 1188–1199. [DOI: 10.2307/1130792]
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. [DOI: 10.3758/BF03203267]
Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249–263. [DOI: 10.3758/BF03198804]
Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329816 [DOI: 10.3758/BF03329816]
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886 [DOI: 10.1162/089892902317361886]
Field, A.P., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R / Andy Field, Jeremy Miles, Zoë Field. Sage Retrieved from  http://repository.fue.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/2902 . Accessed 21 March 2022
Fjell, A. M., Walhovd, K. B., Brown, T. T., Kuperman, J. M., Chung, Y., Hagler, D. J., … Gruen, J. (2012). Multimodal imaging of the self-regulating developing brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 19620–19625. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208243109
Frank, M. C., Sugarman, E., Horowitz, A. C., Lewis, M. L., & Yurovsky, D. (2016). Using tablets to collect data from young children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2015.1061528 [DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2015.1061528]
Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A. (2017). Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language, 44, 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000209 [DOI: 10.1017/S0305000916000209]
Goodrich, B., Gabry, J., Ali, I., & Brilleman, S. (2019). rstanarm: Bayesian applied regression modeling via Stan. Retrieved from  https://mc-stan.org/rstanarm . Accessed 21 March 2022
Goss-Sampson, M., van Doorn, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). Bayesian inference in JASP: A guide for students. Centre for Science and Medicine in Sport & Exercise Retrieved from  https://osf.io/cknxm/ . Accessed 21 March 2022
Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480 [DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480]
Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1 [DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1]
Hughes, M. M., Linck, J. A., Bowles, A. R., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Alternatives to switch-cost scoring in the task-switching paradigm: Their reliability and increased validity. Behavior Research Methods, 4, 702–721. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0411-5 [DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0411-5]
JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.1)[Computer software]. Retrieved from  https://jasp-stats.org/ . Accessed 21 March 2022
Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 43–75. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.000355]
Kieling, C., Kieling, R. R., Rohde, L. A., Frick, P. J., Moffitt, T., Nigg, J. T., … Castellanos, F. X. (2010). The age at onset of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09060796
Kostyrka-Allchorne, K., Cooper, N. R., & Simpson, A. (2017). Touchscreen generation: Children’s current media use, parental supervision methods and attitudes towards contemporary media. Acta Paediatrica, 106, 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13707 [DOI: 10.1111/apa.13707]
Levin, H.S., Wilde, E.A., Chu, Z., Yallampalli, R., Hanten, G.R., Li, X., Hunter, J.V. (2008). Diffusion tensor imaging in relation to cognitive and functional outcome of traumatic brain injury in children. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 23, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HTR.0000327252.54128.7c
Liesefeld, H. R., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs(?). Behavior Research Methods, 51, 40–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1076-x [DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1076-x]
Liesefeld, H. R., Fu, X., & Zimmer, H. D. (2015). Fast and careless or careful and slow? Apparent holistic processing in mental rotation is explained by speed-accuracy trade-offs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1140–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000081 [DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000081]
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490. [DOI: 10.3758/BF03210951]
Maris, G., & van der Maas, H. (2012). Speed-accuracy response models: Scoring rules based on response time and accuracy. Psychometrika, 77, 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9288-y [DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9288-y]
Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017). Bayesian benefits with JASP. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1259614 [DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1259614]
Maxwell, S. E. (1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in repeated measures designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986005003269 [DOI: 10.3102/10769986005003269]
McDermott, J. M., Pérez-Edgar, K., & Fox, N. A. (2007). Variations of the flanker paradigm: Assessing selective attention in young children. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192844 [DOI: 10.3758/BF03192844]
Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. [DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061]
Mullane, J. C., Corkum, P. V., Klein, R. M., & McLaughlin, E. (2009). Interference control in children with and without ADHD: A systematic review of flanker and Simon task performance. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802348028 [DOI: 10.1080/09297040802348028]
Paap, K. R., & Sawi, O. (2016). The role of test-retest reliability in measuring individual and group differences in executive functioning. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 274, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.10.002 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.10.002]
Peirce, J., Gray, J.R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindeløv, J.K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Rafal, R., Gershberg, F., Egly, R., Ivry, R., Kingstone, A., & Ro, T. (1996). Response channel activation and the lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(96)00045-0 [DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00045-0]
Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1966.tb00354.x [DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1966.tb00354.x]
Ridderinkhof, K.R., & van der Molen, M.W. (1995). A psychophysiological analysis of developmental differences in the ability to resist interference. Child Development, 66, 1040. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131797 [DOI: 10.2307/1131797]
Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., Band, G. P. H., & Bashore, T. R. (1997). Sources of interference from irrelevant information: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1997.2367 [DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1997.2367]
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Wylie, S. A., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Bashore, T. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (2021). The arrow of time: Advancing insights into action control from the arrow version of the Eriksen flanker task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 700–721. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02167-z [DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02167-z]
Rouder, J.N., Morey, R.D., Speckman, P.L., & Province, J.M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001]
Rouder, J. N., Engelhardt, C. R., McCabe, S., & Morey, R. D. (2016). Model comparison in ANOVA. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1779–1786. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1026-5 [DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1026-5]
Rouder, J.N., Morey, R.D., Verhagen, J., Swagman, A.R., & Wagenmakers, EJ. (2017). Bayesian analysis of factorial designs. Psychological Methods, 22, 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000057 [DOI: 10.1037/met0000057]
RStudio Team. (2021). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC Retrieved from  http://www.rstudio.com/ . Accessed 21 March 2022
Rueda, M.R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Halparin, J.D., Gruber, D.B., Lercari, L.P., & Posner, M.I. (2004a). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012 [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012]
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2004b). Development of the time course for processing conflict: An event-related potentials study with 4 year olds and adults. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-5-39 [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-5-39]
Sandhofer, C. M., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Learning color words involves learning a system of mappings. Developmental Psychology, 35, 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.668 [DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.668]
Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., Swanson, J., Morein-Zamir, S., Meiran, N., Schut, H., … Sergeant, J. A. (2003). The effect of methylphenidate on three forms of response inhibition in boys with AD/HD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021729501230
Simmering, V. R. (2012). The development of visual working memory capacity in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 695–707. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.007]
Stoffels, E. J., & van der Molen, M. W. (1988). Effects of visual and auditory noise on visual choice reaction time in a continuous-flow paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(1), 7–14.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207468
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Pearson.
Theeuwes, J. (1993). Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis. Acta Psychologica, 83, 93–154. [DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90042-P]
Tijmstra, J., & Bolsinova, M. (2021). Accounting for individual differences in speed in the discretized signed residual time model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 74, 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12223 [DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12223]
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modelling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge University Press.
Vaidya, C.J., Bunge, S.A., Dudukovic, N.M., Zalecki, C.A., Elliott, G.R., & Gabrieli, J.D.E. (2005). Altered neural substrates of cognitive control in childhood ADHD: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1605–1613. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1605 [DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1605]
van de Schoot, R., Kaplan, D., Denissen, J., Asendorpf, J. B., Neyer, F. J., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2014). A gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: Applications to developmental research. Child Development, 85, 842–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12169 [DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12169]
van den Bergh, D., van Doorn, J., Marsman, M., Draws, T., van Kesteren, E.-J., Derks, K., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). A tutorial on conducting and interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP. L’Annee Psychologique, 120, 73–96.
van Maanen, L., Katsimpokis, D., & van Campen, A.D. (2019). Fast and slow errors: Logistic regression to identify patterns in accuracy–response time relationships. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2378–2389. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1110-z [DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1110-z]
Vandierendonck, A. (2017). A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 653–673. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0721-5 [DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0721-5]
Verbruggen, F., Notebaert, W., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 328–333. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193852 [DOI: 10.3758/BF03193852]
Wagenmakers, E.J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., … Morey, R.D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
Westfall, P.H., Johnson, W.O., & Utts, J.M. (1997). A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika, 84, 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/84.2.419 [DOI: 10.1093/biomet/84.2.419]
Wetzels, R., Grasman, R.P.P.P., & Wagenmakers, E.J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for ANOVA designs. The American Statistician, 66, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.695956 [DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2012.695956]
Woltz, D.J., & Was, C.A. (2006). Availability of related long-term memory during and after attention focus in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 34, 668–684. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193587 [DOI: 10.3758/BF03193587]
Zelazo, P.D., Anderson, J.E., Richler, J., Wallner-Allen, K., Beaumont, J.L., & Weintraub, S. (2013). NIH toolbox cognition battery: Measuring executive function and attention. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12032 [DOI: 10.1111/mono.12032]

MeSH Term

Child
Young Adult
Humans
Adolescent
Child, Preschool
Attention
Reaction Time
Adaptation, Physiological
Microcomputers
Research Personnel

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By