Trends in Billing and Medicare Reimbursement for In-Office Cerumen Removal by Otolaryngologists and Other Providers.

Rahul A Patel, Sina J Torabi, David A Kasle, Darpan Kayastha, R Peter Manes
Author Information
  1. Rahul A Patel: Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, USA. ORCID
  2. Sina J Torabi: Department of Surgery (Division of Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. ORCID
  3. David A Kasle: Department of Surgery (Division of Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. ORCID
  4. Darpan Kayastha: Department of Surgery (Division of Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  5. R Peter Manes: Department of Surgery (Division of Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze trends in billing patterns, Medicare reimbursement, and practice-setting for otolaryngologists (ORLs) and other provider types performing in-office cerumen removal.
METHODS: This retrospective study included data on Medicare-billing providers from the Medicare Part B: Provider Utilization and Payment Datafiles (2012-2018). Number of providers performing in-office cerumen removal, total sums and medians for Medicare reimbursements and services, and services per patient were gathered along with geographic distributions.
RESULTS: There have been near linear declines in number of general physicians and other provider types performing cerumen extractions with 42.6% and 40.7% declines, respectively, and near linear growth in number of ORLs and advanced practice providers (APPs) with 9.7% and 51.1% growth, respectively. At the median, general physicians, APPs, and other provider types have been billing for a similar and constant number of cerumen extractions per provider, while ORLs have seen a 10.6% increase. Total Medicare reimbursement to general physicians and other provider types has fallen 45.0% and 32.5%, respectively, and to ORLs and APPs has grown 16.9% and 103.4%, respectively. Compared to non-ORLs, ORLs tend to bill for cerumen extraction out of an urban setting rather than a rural setting (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: General physicians and other provider types are increasingly referring cerumen disimpaction patients to ORL physicians and allowing APPs to perform these procedures, indicating a change in landscape of medical practice among these providers. General physicians may be filling a need in the rural setting, where there are fewer ORLs practicing.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Aged
Humans
United States
Otolaryngologists
Retrospective Studies
Cerumen
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Medicare

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By