Development of a Highly Sensitive Neurofilament Light Chain Assay on an Automated Immunoassay Platform.

Stephen Lee, Tatiana Plavina, Carol M Singh, Kuangnan Xiong, Xiaolei Qiu, Richard A Rudick, Peter A Calabresi, Lauren Stevenson, Danielle Graham, Denitza Raitcheva, Christopher Green, Madeleine Matias, Arejas J Uzgiris
Author Information
  1. Stephen Lee: Siemens Healthcare Laboratory, LLC, Berkeley, CA, United States.
  2. Tatiana Plavina: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  3. Carol M Singh: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  4. Kuangnan Xiong: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  5. Xiaolei Qiu: Siemens Healthcare Laboratory, LLC, Berkeley, CA, United States.
  6. Richard A Rudick: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  7. Peter A Calabresi: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  8. Lauren Stevenson: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  9. Danielle Graham: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  10. Denitza Raitcheva: Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  11. Christopher Green: Siemens Healthcare Laboratory, LLC, Berkeley, CA, United States.
  12. Madeleine Matias: Siemens Healthcare Laboratory, LLC, Berkeley, CA, United States.
  13. Arejas J Uzgiris: Siemens Healthcare Laboratory, LLC, Berkeley, CA, United States.

Abstract

Background: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is an axonal cytoskeletal protein that is released into the extracellular space following neuronal or axonal injury associated with neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and other diseases. NfL is detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood. Numerous studies on MS have demonstrated that NfL is correlated with disease activity, predicts disease progression, and is reduced by treatment with MS disease-modifying drugs, making NfL an attractive candidate to supplement existing clinical and imaging measures in MS. However, for NfL to achieve its potential as a clinically useful biomarker for clinical decision-making or drug development, a standardized, practical, and widely accessible assay is needed. Our objective was to develop a novel NfL assay on an automated, globally available immunoassay platform and validate its performance.
Methods: A prototype NfL assay was first developed and evaluated on the ADVIA Centaur XP immunoassay system from Siemens Healthineers. The lower limit of quantitation (LLoQ), within-lab precision, assay range, cross-reactivity with neurofilament medium and heavy chains, and effect of interfering substances were determined. NfL assay values in serum and CSF were compared with radiological and clinical disease activity measures in patients with MS and ALS, respectively. This assay was further optimized to utilize serum, plasma, and CSF sample types on the Atellica IM system and transferred to Siemens' CLIA laboratory where it was analytically validated as a laboratory-developed test (LDT).
Results: In this study, an LLoQ of 1.85 pg/mL, within-lab precision <6%, and an assay range of up to 646 pg/mL were demonstrated with the serum prototype assay. Cross-reactivity of <0.7% with the neurofilament medium and heavy chains was observed. Serum and CSF NfL assay values were associated with radiological and clinical disease activity measures in patients with MS and ALS, respectively. The optimized version of the NfL assay demonstrated specimen equivalence with additional plasma tube types and was analytically validated as an LDT.
Conclusion: The analytical performance of the NfL assay fulfilled all acceptance criteria; therefore, we suggest that the assay is acceptable for use in both research and clinical practice settings to determine elevated NfL levels in patients.

Keywords

References

Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Dec;7(12):2508-2523 [PMID: 33146954]
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10381 [PMID: 32587320]
Neurology. 2015 Jun 2;84(22):2247-57 [PMID: 25934855]
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):113-26 [PMID: 24331797]
Neurology. 2020 Mar 17;94(11):e1201-e1212 [PMID: 32047070]
Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Aug;6(8):699-706 [PMID: 15303099]
Adv Neurobiol. 2017;15:491-528 [PMID: 28674995]
J Neurochem. 1996 Nov;67(5):2013-8 [PMID: 8863508]
Mol Neurobiol. 2020 Nov;57(11):4667-4691 [PMID: 32772223]
Bioanalysis. 2019 Aug;11(15):1405-1418 [PMID: 31401845]
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 07;11:632 [PMID: 32849170]
Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Oct;11(10):585-96 [PMID: 26392381]
Cells. 2021 Jun 18;10(6): [PMID: 34207058]
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 28;11:919 [PMID: 32982935]
Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Dec;128(6):e33-6 [PMID: 23763388]
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Dec;41(12):1023-1037 [PMID: 33127098]
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2016278 [PMID: 33151313]
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):396-406 [PMID: 33427873]
J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 21;270(16):9334-9 [PMID: 7721855]
Neurology. 2017 Nov 28;89(22):2230-2237 [PMID: 29079686]
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;90(8):870-881 [PMID: 30967444]
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;90(12):1324-1330 [PMID: 31611264]
Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):857-870 [PMID: 28512753]
Mult Scler. 2021 Sep;27(10):1497-1505 [PMID: 33307998]
Mult Scler. 2012 May;18(5):552-6 [PMID: 22492131]

Grants

  1. U01 NS111678/NINDS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By