Jie Chen, Jun Chen, Jeremiah A Heilman, Kevin J Glaser, Roger C Grimm, Nana Owusu, Caixin Qiu, Richard L Ehman, Meng Yin
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance and repeatability assessing liver, spleen, and kidney stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), using arrays of pneumatic passive drivers.
METHODS: An array of four flexible, pneumatically activated passive drivers for abdominal MRE were developed and tested in this study. Multiple MRE acquisitions were performed prospectively in a series of eleven volunteers, with activation of all combinations of the four drivers, individually and simultaneously. MRE exams were repeated three times to study within-day and between-day test-retest repeatability. Semi-quantitative evaluation of wave propagation and penetration, and quantitative assessment of tissue stiffness was conducted for liver, spleen, and kidneys.
RESULTS: When driver location and amplitude were sufficient to achieve necessary shear wave illumination in any given region of interest, the results showed excellent test-retest repeatability in abdominal organ stiffness with both single and multiple driver configurations. The results confirmed that multiple driver arrays provided suitable shear wave illumination over a larger region of the abdomen, allowing more reliable stiffness measurements in multiple organs. MRE assessment of the spleen was found to be prone to effects of excessive shear wave amplitude, however.
CONCLUSION: A multiple driver array provides shear wave illumination over a larger region of the abdomen than obtained with a single driver, for MRE assessment of multiple abdominal organs, providing excellent test-retest repeatability in stiffness measurements. However, careful tuning of the location and amplitude of each driver is essential to achieve consistent results.
Hoodeshenas S, Yin M, Venkatesh SK. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;27:319–33.
[DOI:
10.1097/RMR.0000000000000177]
Kennedy P, Stocker D, Carbonell G, Said D, Bane O, Hectors S, et al. MR elastography outperforms shear wave elastography for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:8339–49.
[DOI:
10.1007/s00330-022-08935-9]
Singh R, Wilson MP, Katlariwala P, Murad MH, McInnes MDF, Low G. Accuracy of liver and spleen stiffness on magnetic resonance elastography for detecting portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;32:237–45.
[DOI:
10.1097/MEG.0000000000001724]
Morisaka H, Motosugi U, Ichikawa S, Sano K, Ichikawa T, Enomoto N. Association of splenic MR elastographic findings with gastroesophageal varices in patients with chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:117–24.
[DOI:
10.1002/jmri.24505]
Ronot M, Lambert S, Elkrief L, Doblas S, Rautou P-E, Castera L, et al. Assessment of portal hypertension and high-risk oesophageal varices with liver and spleen three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography in liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1394–402.
[PMID:
24626745]
Dyvorne HA, Jajamovich GH, Besa C, Cooper N, Taouli B. Simultaneous measurement of hepatic and splenic stiffness using MR elastography: preliminary experience. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:803–9.
[DOI:
10.1007/s00261-014-0255-1]
Bensamoun SF, Robert L, Leclerc GE, Debernard L, Charleux F. Stiffness imaging of the kidney and adjacent abdominal tissues measured simultaneously using magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Imaging. 2011;35:284–7.
[DOI:
10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.009]
Wang J, Deng Y, Jondal D, Woodrum DM, Shi Y, Yin M, et al. New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2018;27:335–52.
[DOI:
10.1097/RMR.0000000000000182]
Zheng Y, Li G, Chen M, Chan QCC, Hu SG, Zhao XN, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography with twin pneumatic drivers for wave compensation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:2611–3.
[PMID:
18002530]
Zheng Y, Chan QCC, Yang ES. Magnetic resonance elastography with twin drivers for high homogeneity and sensitivity. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:1916–9.
[DOI:
10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259790]
Mariappan YK, Rossman PJ, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography with a phased-array acoustic driver system. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:678–85.
[DOI:
10.1002/mrm.21885]
Neumann W, Lehnart VR, Vetter Y, Bichert A, Schad LR, Zöllner FG. Coupled actuators with a mechanically synchronized phase during MR elastography: A phantom feasibility study. Concepts Magn Reson Part B. 2018;48B:e21403.
[DOI:
10.1002/cmr.b.21403]
Dittmann F, Tzschätzsch H, Hirsch S, Barnhill E, Braun J, Sack I, et al. Tomoelastography of the abdomen: Tissue mechanical properties of the liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas from single MR elastography scans at different hydration states: Tomoelastography of the Abdomen. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78:976–83.
[DOI:
10.1002/mrm.26484]
Silva AM, Grimm RC, Glaser KJ, Fu Y, Wu T, Ehman RL, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography: evaluation of new inversion algorithm and quantitative analysis method. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:810–7.
[DOI:
10.1007/s00261-015-0372-5]
Serai SD, Obuchowski NA, Venkatesh SK, Sirlin CB, Miller FH, Ashton E, et al. Repeatability of MR Elastography of Liver: A Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2017;285:92–100.
[DOI:
10.1148/radiol.2017161398]
Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Venkatesh S, Rossman PJ, Grimm RC, Manduca A, et al. Feasibility of in vivo MR elastographic splenic stiffness measurements in the assessment of portal hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:122–7.
[DOI:
10.2214/AJR.07.3504]
Mannelli L, Godfrey E, Joubert I, Patterson AJ, Graves MJ, Gallagher FA, et al. MR elastography: Spleen stiffness measurements in healthy volunteers--preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:387–92.
[DOI:
10.2214/AJR.09.3390]
Gandhi D, Kalra P, Raterman B, Mo X, Dong H, Kolipaka A. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of kidneys: SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and its comparison to GRE MRE. NMR Biomed. 2019;32:e4141.
[DOI:
10.1002/nbm.4141]
