Ashley A Edwards, Laura M Steacy, Noam Seigelman, Valeria M Rigobon, Devin M Kearns, Jay G Rueckl, Donald L Compton
Set for variability (SfV) is an oral language task which requires an individual to disambiguate the mismatch between the decoded form of an irregular word and its actual lexical pronunciation. For example, in the task, the word is pronounced to rhyme with (i.e., //) and the individual must recognize the actual pronunciation of the word to be //. SfV has been shown to be a significant predictor of both item-specific and general word reading variance above and beyond that associated with phonemic awareness skill, letter-sound knowledge, and vocabulary skill. However, very little is known about the child characteristics and word features that affect SfV item performance. In this study we explored whether word features and child characteristics that involve phonology only are adequate to explain item-level variance in SfV performance or whether including predictors that involve the connection between phonology and orthography explain additional variance. To accomplish this we administered the SfV task (=75 items) to a sample of grade 2-5 children (=489) along with a battery of reading, reading related, and language measures. Results suggest that variance in SfV performance is uniquely accounted for by measures tapping phonological skill along with those capturing knowledge of phonology to orthography associations, but more so in children with better decoding skill. Additionally, word reading skill was found to moderate the influence of other predictors suggesting that how the task is approached may be impacted by word reading and decoding ability.
Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2012 Apr;10(1):51-70
[PMID:
26504617]
Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;2(2 Suppl):31-74
[PMID:
11878018]
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1292-1312
[PMID:
31950361]
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(5):856-64
[PMID:
22519676]
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59
[PMID:
17958156]
J Commun Disord. 2011 Jan-Feb;44(1):49-58
[PMID:
20691979]
Science. 1965 May 21;148(3673):1066-72
[PMID:
14289608]
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11
[PMID:
24142837]
Child Dev. 2021 May;92(3):e252-e269
[PMID:
33222202]
Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):491-528
[PMID:
10467896]
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Nov;104(3):267-82
[PMID:
19608198]
Cognition. 1995 May;55(2):151-218; discussion 219-26
[PMID:
7789090]
Sci Stud Read. 2019;23(1):49-63
[PMID:
30853786]
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Oct;104(2):239-51
[PMID:
19481221]
Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12577
[PMID:
28701027]
Mem Cognit. 1984 May;12(3):293-305
[PMID:
6472110]
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Jun;19(1):5-51
[PMID:
29890888]
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2008;36:31-82
[PMID:
18808041]
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):662-720
[PMID:
15250780]
Sci Stud Read. 2019;23(6):523-532
[PMID:
32855591]