Increasing the use of experimental methods in nursing and midwifery education research.

Roger Watson, Marco Tomietto, Kristina Mikkonen
Author Information
  1. Roger Watson: Nurse Education in Practice, United Kingdom. Electronic address: nepeditor@outlook.com.
  2. Marco Tomietto: Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
  3. Kristina Mikkonen: Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, Oulu University, Finland.

Abstract

AIM: To consider how more use could be made of experimental research in nursing and midwifery education.
BACKGROUND: Much use has been made in nursing and midwifery educational research of pre- and post-, within-subjects research. While this has its place and has been a valuable design for testing educational interventions, there has been a distinct lack of more rigorous experimental designs.
DESIGN: Discussion paper to consider the use of experimental designs in nursing and midwifery education research.
METHODS: A review of within-subjects designs, between-subjects designs and new approaches to experimental research such as pragmatic designs, non-inferiority designs and the framework offered by complex interventions.
RESULTS: Recommendations for implementing experimental designs in nursing and midwifery education research have been drawn.
CONCLUSIONS: Within-subjects designs have dominated experimental research in nursing and midwifery education. While suitable for preliminary studies, they should be augmented by more rigorous designs based on between-subjects designs. These do not have to be strictly randomised controlled trials and there are many reasons why these are hard to implement in nursing and midwifery education research. However, a range of alternatives is available.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Pregnancy
Humans
Female
Research Design
Midwifery
Students, Nursing
Education, Nursing

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By