BACKGROUND: Surgical clips are commonly used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cystic duct and artery ligation. Titanium and polymer clips are the two most common types used for this indication. Given the cost-saving potential, design advantages, and decreased incidence of complications associated with polymer clips, we sought to study whether there is a clinically significant difference in outcome between polymer and titanium clips in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive cases using polymer clips followed by 50 consecutive cases using metal clips over a 6-month period by residents under the direction of a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The following outcomes were evaluated: incidence of bile leak, postoperative bleeding, need for additional procedures, hospital length of stay, and cost.
RESULTS: We found that significantly more misfires occurred with the use of the polymer clips (n=17) than with the titanium clips (n=2, p<.001). Eight cases (16%) required opening of an additional polymer clip cartridge to complete the operation. Despite this additional expense, the total cost as it pertained to clip usage ($30.32 USD) was still lower than that using titanium clips ($139.17 USD). While these numbers were not statistically significant, three cases had bile leaks and required additional procedures, all of which were performed with metal clips. No postoperative bleeds were identified and there was no difference in hospital length of stay; most patients were discharged on the day of the procedure.
CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate comparable clinical outcomes between laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed with polymer and titanium clips, though polymer clip usage carries a lower cost.
