The burden of dengue and force of infection among children in Kerala, India; seroprevalence estimates from Government of Kerala-WHO Dengue study.

Pillaveetil Sathyadas Indu, Thekkumkara Surendran Anish, Sujatha Chintha, Gnanaseelan Kanakamma Libu, Lawrence Tony, Nalinakshan Sudha Siju, Easwaran Sreekumar, Asokan Santhoshkumar, Reghukumar Aravind, Karunakaran Lalithabai Saradadevi, Sahadevan Sunija, Jaichand Johnson, Madhukumar Geethakumari Anupriya, Thomas Mathew, Kalathil Joseph Reena, Vasu Meenakshy, Premaletha Namitha, Narendran Pradeep Kumar, Roop Kumari, Ahmed Jamsheed Mohamed, Bhupender Nagpal, Swarup Sarkar, Rajeev Sadanandan, Raman Velayudhan
Author Information
  1. Pillaveetil Sathyadas Indu: Department of Community Medicine, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  2. Thekkumkara Surendran Anish: Department of Community Medicine, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  3. Sujatha Chintha: Department of Community Medicine, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  4. Gnanaseelan Kanakamma Libu: Department of Community Medicine, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  5. Lawrence Tony: Department of Community Medicine, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  6. Nalinakshan Sudha Siju: Department of Community Medicine, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  7. Easwaran Sreekumar: Molecular Virology Laboratory, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (RGCB), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
  8. Asokan Santhoshkumar: Department of Paediatrics, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  9. Reghukumar Aravind: Department of Infectious Diseases, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  10. Karunakaran Lalithabai Saradadevi: Department of Microbiology, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sceinces, India.
  11. Sahadevan Sunija: State Public Health Lab, Kerala, India.
  12. Jaichand Johnson: State Public Health Lab, Kerala, India.
  13. Madhukumar Geethakumari Anupriya: Molecular Virology Laboratory, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (RGCB), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
  14. Thomas Mathew: Directorate of Medical Education, Kerala, India.
  15. Kalathil Joseph Reena: Directorate of Health Services, Kerala, India.
  16. Vasu Meenakshy: Directorate of Health Services, Kerala, India.
  17. Premaletha Namitha: Department of Community Medicine, Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.
  18. Narendran Pradeep Kumar: Indian Council of Medical Research - Vector Control Research Centre, India.
  19. Roop Kumari: India Country Office-WHO, New Delhi, India.
  20. Ahmed Jamsheed Mohamed: South East Asia Region Office-WHO, New Delhi, India.
  21. Bhupender Nagpal: South East Asia Region Office-WHO, New Delhi, India.
  22. Swarup Sarkar: South East Asia Region Office-WHO, New Delhi, India.
  23. Rajeev Sadanandan: Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of Kerala, India.
  24. Raman Velayudhan: Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

Background: Dengue shows high geographic heterogeneity within and across endemic countries. In the context of increasing burden and predicted outbreaks due to climate change, understanding the heterogeneity will enable us to develop region specific targeted interventions, including vaccination. World Health Organisation (WHO) suggests standard methodologies to study the burden and heterogeneity at national and subnational levels. Regional studies with robust and standard methodology to capture heterogeneity are scarce. We estimated the seroprevalence of dengue in children aged 9-12 years and the force of infection in Kerala, India, from where Zika cases also have been reported recently.
Methods: We conducted a school-based cross-sectional survey in 38 clusters; selected by stratified random sampling, representing rural, urban, high burden and low-burden administrative units. Validation of Indirect IgG ELISA was done by Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT) using the local isolates of all four serotypes. Force of infection (FOI) was estimated using the WHO-FOI calculator. We conducted a follow-up survey among a subsample of seronegative children, to estimate the rate of sero-conversion.
Results: Among 5236 children tested, 1521 were positive for anti-dengue IgG antibody. The overall seroprevalence in the state was 29% (95% CI 24.1-33.9). The validity corrected seroprevalence was 30.9% in the overall sample, 46.9% in Thiruvananthapuram, 26.9% in Kozhikkode and 24.9% in Kollam. Age-specific seroprevalence increased with age; 25.7% at 9 years, 29.5% at 10 years, 30.9% at 11 years and 33.9% at 12 years. Seroprevalence varied widely across clusters (16.1%-71.4%). The estimated force of infection was 3.3/100 person-years and the seroconversion rate was 4.8/100 person-years. 90% of children who tested positive were not aware of dengue infection. All the four serotypes were identified in PRNT and 40% of positive samples had antibodies against multiple serotypes.
Interpretation: The study validates the WHO methodology for dengue serosurveys and confirms its feasibility in a community setting. The overall seroprevalence in the 9-12 year age group is low to moderate in Kerala; there are regional variations; high burden and low burden clusters co-exist in the same districts. The actual burden of dengue exceeds the reported numbers. Heterogeneity in prevalence, the high proportion of inapparent dengue and the hyperendemic situation suggest the need for region-specific and targeted interventions, including vaccination.
Funding: World Health Organization.

Keywords

References

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012 May;106(5):273-82 [PMID: 22357401]
Acta Trop. 2010 Mar;113(3):234-40 [PMID: 19896921]
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0154760 [PMID: 27213782]
Trop Med Health. 2011 Dec;39(4 Suppl):3-11 [PMID: 22500131]
PLoS Pathog. 2018 May 3;14(5):e1006965 [PMID: 29723307]
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):296 [PMID: 30940086]
Viral Immunol. 2008 Jun;21(2):123-32 [PMID: 18476771]
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Apr;10(4):379-86 [PMID: 15807802]
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):1116 [PMID: 31412836]
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Nov;91(5):1039-48 [PMID: 25223944]
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May 1;112(5):223-229 [PMID: 29917129]
J Infect Public Health. 2017 Sep - Oct;10(5):494-498 [PMID: 28262571]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Jun 06;7(6):e2259 [PMID: 23755315]
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1065-e1073 [PMID: 31201130]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jun 15;11(6):e0005621 [PMID: 28617803]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 21;12(11):e0006748 [PMID: 30462654]
J Med Virol. 2015 Dec;87(12):2159-62 [PMID: 26058712]
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Oct 2;116(10):900-909 [PMID: 35144283]
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Mar;100(3):635-638 [PMID: 30675849]
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;54:25-30 [PMID: 27825949]
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2011 Feb 02;8(1):1 [PMID: 21288353]
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Apr 29;354(1384):757-68 [PMID: 10365401]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Mar 02;4(3):e617 [PMID: 20209155]
Data Brief. 2020 Feb 08;29:105266 [PMID: 32095494]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jul 16;12(7):e0006618 [PMID: 30011275]

Grants

  1. 001/World Health Organization

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By