Sukyoung Jung, Heather A Young, Barbara H Braffett, Samuel J Simmens, Cynthia L Ogden
BACKGROUND: A transformation towards healthy diets through a sustainable food system is essential to enhance both human and planet health. Development of a valid, multidimensional, quantitative index of a sustainable diet would allow monitoring progress in the US population. We evaluated the content and construct validity of a sustainable diet index for US adults (SDI-US) based on data collected at the individual level.
METHODS: The SDI-US, adapted from the SDI validated in the French population, was developed using data on US adults aged 20 years and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2018 (n = 25,543). The index consisted of 4 sub-indices, made up of 12 indicators, corresponding to 4 dimensions of sustainable diets (nutritional quality, environmental impacts, affordability (economic), and ready-made product use behaviors (sociocultural)). A higher SDI-US score indicates greater alignment with sustainable diets (range: 4-20). Validation analyses were performed, including the assessment of the relevance of each indicator, correlations between individual indicators, sub-indices, and total SDI-US, differences in scores between sociodemographic subgroups, and associations with selected food groups in dietary guidelines, the alternative Mediterranean diet (aMed) score, and the EAT-Lancet diet score.
RESULTS: Total SDI-US mean was 13.1 (standard error 0.04). The correlation between SDI-US and sub-indices ranged from 0.39 for the environmental sub-index to 0.61 for the economic sub-index (Pearson Correlation coefficient). The correlation between a modified SDI-US after removing each sub-index and the SDI-US ranged from 0.83 to 0.93. aMed scores and EAT-Lancet diet scores were significantly higher among adults in the highest SDI-US quintile compared to the lowest quintile (aMed: 4.6 vs. 3.2; EAT-Lancet diet score: 9.9 vs. 8.7 p < .0001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, content and construct validity of the SDI-US were acceptable. The SDI-US reflected the key features of sustainable diets by integrating four sub-indices, comparable to the SDI-France. The SDI-US can be used to assess alignment with sustainable diets in the US. Continued monitoring of US adults' diets using the SDI-US could help improve dietary sustainability.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 09;8(10):e76632
[PMID:
24130784]
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1622-1633
[PMID:
30146073]
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 02;16(7):
[PMID:
30986991]
Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106124
[PMID:
32437702]
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):213-214
[PMID:
31235280]
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525
[PMID:
30305731]
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Feb 04;4(3):nzaa015
[PMID:
32154501]
Vital Health Stat 2. 2020 Apr;(184):1-35
[PMID:
33663649]
Adv Nutr. 2016 Jul 15;7(4):641-64
[PMID:
27422501]
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1086-92
[PMID:
21653922]
Nutrients. 2021 May 17;13(5):
[PMID:
34067774]
Br J Nutr. 2019 May;121(10):1166-1177
[PMID:
30973117]
J Nutr. 2022 Jul 6;152(7):1763-1772
[PMID:
35554563]
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992
[PMID:
29853680]
Br J Nutr. 2009 Jul;101 Suppl 2:S73-85
[PMID:
19594967]
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jan 1;107(1):80-93
[PMID:
29381789]
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Jul 1;112(1):138-149
[PMID:
31725157]
Adv Nutr. 2016 Jan 15;7(1):121-34
[PMID:
26773020]
Vital Health Stat 1. 2013 Aug;(56):1-37
[PMID:
25078429]
Public Health Nutr. 2003 May;6(3):313-21
[PMID:
12740081]
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Dec;118(6):1113-1122
[PMID:
37742929]
J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Aug;28(4):421S-426S
[PMID:
20368382]
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):324-32
[PMID:
18689367]
J Nutr. 2009 Aug;139(8):1549-54
[PMID:
19549759]
J Nutr. 2015 Dec;145(12):2639-45
[PMID:
26468491]
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar 4;115(3):705-716
[PMID:
34791011]
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492
[PMID:
30660336]
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):e026318
[PMID:
37066787]
Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Apr;65(4 Suppl):1220S-1228S; discussion 1229S-1231S
[PMID:
9094926]
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 May;35(5):471-481
[PMID:
32140936]
Circulation. 2009 Mar 3;119(8):1093-100
[PMID:
19221219]
Environ Res Lett. 2018 Apr;13(4):044004
[PMID:
29853988]