Governance effects of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation of carbon emission trading policy in China.

Xin Cheng, Ziyi Yu, Jingyue Gao, Yanting Liu, Shiwei Jiang
Author Information
  1. Xin Cheng: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China; Research Centre of Resource and Environmental Economics & Mineral Resource Strategy and Policy Research Centre of China, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China. Electronic address: cxjournal@163.com.
  2. Ziyi Yu: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China. Electronic address: yuzy47@163.com.
  3. Jingyue Gao: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China. Electronic address: gziyii@163.com.
  4. Yanting Liu: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China. Electronic address: lyt-cug@cug.edu.cn.
  5. Shiwei Jiang: School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, PR China. Electronic address: jsw3427@163.com.

Abstract

China's carbon emission trading policy plays a crucial role in achieving both its "3060" dual carbon objectives and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 13 (SDG 13) on climate action. The policy's effectiveness in reducing pollution and mitigating carbon emissions holds significant importance. This paper investigated whether China's carbon emission trading policy affects pollution reduction (PM and SO) and carbon mitigation (CO) in pilot regions, using panel data from 30 provinces and municipalities in China from 2005 to 2019 and employing a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model. Furthermore, it analyzed the heterogeneity of carbon market mechanisms and regional variations. Finally, it examined the governance pathways for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation from a holistic perspective. The results indicate that: (1) China's carbon emission trading policy has reduced CO emissions by 18% and SO emissions by 36% in pilot areas, with an immediate impact on the "carbon mitigation" effect, while the "pollution reduction" effect exhibits a time lag. (2) Higher carbon trading prices lead to stronger "carbon mitigation" effect, and larger carbon market scales are associated with greater "pollution reduction" effects on PM. Governance effects on pollution reduction and carbon mitigation vary among pilot regions: Carbon markets of Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai, and Tianjin show significant governance effects in both "pollution reduction" and "carbon mitigation", whereas Guangdong's carbon market exhibits only a "pollution reduction" effect, and Hubei's carbon market demonstrates only a "carbon mitigation" effect. (3) Currently, China's carbon emission trading policy achieves pollution reduction and carbon mitigation through "process management" and "end-of-pipe treatment". This study could provide empirical insights and policy implications for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation, as well as for the development of China's carbon emission trading market.

Keywords

MeSH Term

China
Air Pollution
Environmental Policy
Air Pollutants
Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Particulate Matter

Chemicals

Air Pollutants
Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Particulate Matter

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By