Objective: To comprehensively analyze the ADRs associated with Denosumab (Prolia) in the treatment of osteoporosis using data from the FAERS database, and gain a better understanding of the potential risks and side effects of Denosumab (Prolia) therapy.
Methods: Data of Denosumab (Prolia) were collected from the FAERS database covering the period from first quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2023. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian analysis confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) to detect positive signals.
Results: Totally, 17,985,365 reports were collected from the FAERS database, 1,97,807 reports of Denosumab (Prolia) were identified as the "primary suspected (PS)" ADRs. Denosumab (Prolia) induced ADRs occurred in 27 organ systems. 38 significant disproportionality PTs satisfying with the three algorithms were retained at the same time. Unexpected significant ADRs such as bone density abnormal and immobile also occur. The majority of the ADRs occurred within the first 30 days after Denosumab (Prolia) initiation.
Conclusion: Based on the American FAERS database, the high frequency ADRs of Denosumab (Prolia) were hypocalcaemia, bone density abnormal, eczema, rebound effect, spinal deformity, etc. Clinical use of this drug should focus on this part of ADRs. Attention should also be paid to newly discovered ADRs, such as immobile, menopausal symptoms, etc., to avoid more serious consequences. Cohort studies, more detailed and comprehensive case information, and long-term clinical investigations are needed to confirm these results and to further understand the safety profile of Denosumab (Prolia).
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;104(5):1753-1765
[PMID:
30535289]
NCHS Data Brief. 2021 Mar;(405):1-8
[PMID:
34029181]
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121106
[PMID:
34398202]
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65
[PMID:
19671655]
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):364-376
[PMID:
30696576]
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 6;166(11):818-839
[PMID:
28492856]
Front Immunol. 2014 Oct 20;5:511
[PMID:
25368616]
Int J Med Sci. 2013 Apr 25;10(7):796-803
[PMID:
23794943]
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 30;12(4):
[PMID:
32235443]
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 May 19;14:1182753
[PMID:
37274347]
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 01;14:1225919
[PMID:
38027014]
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Jul 8;15(7):
[PMID:
35803612]
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):1274-1278
[PMID:
27255807]
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jan;91(1):123-33
[PMID:
22158568]
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Oct 01;14:4029-4051
[PMID:
33061307]
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81
[PMID:
25182228]
Spine J. 2014 Mar 1;14(3):560-5
[PMID:
24342704]
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Oct;34(10):1799-1804
[PMID:
37405407]
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Aug;101(8):3163-70
[PMID:
27270237]
Drug Ther Bull. 2021 Sep;59(9):139-143
[PMID:
33563651]
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;66(12):1139-46
[PMID:
22967310]
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 15;12(1):19555
[PMID:
36380085]
JAMA. 2001 Feb 14;285(6):785-95
[PMID:
11176917]
Mult Scler. 2021 Jun;27(7):1066-1076
[PMID:
32820687]