Jae-Hong Lee, Jianping Jia, Yong Ji, Nagaendran Kandiah, SangYun Kim, Vincent Mok, Ming-Chyi Pai, Vorapun Senanarong, Chong Hyun Suh, Christopher Chen
Advances in biomarker-based diagnostic modalities, recent approval of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for early Alzheimer's disease (AD; mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to AD) and late-stage clinical development of other disease-modifying therapies for AD necessitate a significant paradigm shift in the early detection, diagnosis and management of AD. Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies target the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of AD and have demonstrated a significant reduction in the rate of clinical decline in cognitive and functional outcome measures in patients with early AD. With growing recognition of the benefit of early interventions in AD, an increasing number of people may seek diagnosis for their subjective cognitive problems in an already busy medical system. Various factors such as limited examination time, lack of expertise for cognitive assessment and limited access to specialized tests can impact diagnostic accuracy and timely detection of AD. To overcome these challenges, a new model of care will be required. In this paper, we provide practical guidance for institutional readiness for anti-amyloid therapies for early AD in Asia, in terms of best practices for identifying eligible patients and diagnosing them appropriately, safe administration of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies and monitoring of treatment, managing potential adverse events such as infusion reactions and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, and cross-disciplinary collaboration. Education and training will be the cornerstone for the establishment of new pathways of care for the identification of patients with early AD and delivery of anti-amyloid therapies in a safe and efficient manner to eligible patients.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Apr;14(2):e200230
[PMID:
38223345]
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jan;14(1):1
[PMID:
25496878]
Neurology. 2015 Feb 10;84(6):623-5
[PMID:
25666629]
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Jan;13(1):1-7
[PMID:
27583652]
Expert Rev Neurother. 2011 Nov;11(11):1579-91
[PMID:
22014137]
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Feb;28(2):189-210
[PMID:
26450414]
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e105-e125
[PMID:
34998485]
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 31;23(1):55
[PMID:
36717818]
JAMA. 2023 Aug 8;330(6):495
[PMID:
37466999]
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Oct 10;14:937486
[PMID:
36299608]
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1691-1704
[PMID:
33720637]
Brain. 2023 Nov 2;146(11):4414-4424
[PMID:
37280110]
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(4):1323-1330
[PMID:
36031899]
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 23;16:4213-4225
[PMID:
38156291]
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Apr;15(4):384-389
[PMID:
29475235]
JAMA. 2023 Dec 19;330(23):2304-2305
[PMID:
38112817]
Dementia (London). 2020 Feb;19(2):438-446
[PMID:
27913595]
Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 05;16:1093169
[PMID:
36545535]
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;84(4):1645-1656
[PMID:
34719493]
CNS Drugs. 2023 Aug;37(8):671-677
[PMID:
37470978]
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 5;388(1):9-21
[PMID:
36449413]
Singapore Med J. 2013 Nov;54(11):616-9
[PMID:
24276096]
Nat Aging. 2022 Aug;2(8):692-703
[PMID:
37118137]
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;26(10):5481-5503
[PMID:
34456336]
BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 25;18(1):122
[PMID:
29801476]
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Jan 22;10(1):6
[PMID:
29370825]
Dementia (London). 2020 Apr;19(3):830-846
[PMID:
30025474]
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Jun 1;1(2):249-259
[PMID:
26140284]
Dementia (London). 2020 Jul;19(5):1441-1473
[PMID:
30296834]
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):362-377
[PMID:
37357276]
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 17;23(1):496
[PMID:
37592221]
Ann Neurol. 2024 Apr;95(4):625-634
[PMID:
38180638]
Neurology. 2022 Nov 8;99(19):e2092-e2101
[PMID:
36038268]
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Apr;19(4):1598-1695
[PMID:
36918389]
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2022 Nov 22;6(1):699-710
[PMID:
36606209]
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Jan;18(1):159-177
[PMID:
34043269]