Safety and activity of lenalidomide in combination with obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single group, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.

Ashwath Gurumurthi, Collin K Chin, Lei Feng, Nathan H Fowler, Paolo Strati, Fredrick B Hagemeister, Luis E Fayad, Jason R Westin, Chizobam Obi, Janine Arafat, Ranjit Nair, Raphael E Steiner, Sattva S Neelapu, Christopher R Flowers, Loretta J Nastoupil
Author Information
  1. Ashwath Gurumurthi: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  2. Collin K Chin: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  3. Lei Feng: Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  4. Nathan H Fowler: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  5. Paolo Strati: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  6. Fredrick B Hagemeister: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  7. Luis E Fayad: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  8. Jason R Westin: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  9. Chizobam Obi: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  10. Janine Arafat: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  11. Ranjit Nair: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  12. Raphael E Steiner: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  13. Sattva S Neelapu: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  14. Christopher R Flowers: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  15. Loretta J Nastoupil: Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Abstract

Background: Rituximab and lenalidomide is a preferred option for relapsed indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Obinutuzumab may be a superior combination partner with lenalidomide given enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis compared to rituximab. Our aim was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and activity of lenalidomide in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory WHO Grade 1-3A follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma and adequate performance status (ECOG 0-2) at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. We excluded patients with evidence of ongoing transformation to aggressive lymphoma. During phase 1, 1000 mg intravenous obinutuzumab was administered with three predefined levels of oral lenalidomide in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to establish lenalidomide 20 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. During phase 2, patients received induction therapy with six 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 20 mg with intravenous obinutuzumab 1000 mg. In accordance with our prior experience with lenalidomide plus rituximab, patients who were responding to the combination could receive up to 6 additional cycles (up to 12 cycles in total) of combination therapy. Dosing of obinutuzumab was continued in all responding patients after cycle 6 every 2 months for a total of 30 months from the start of therapy. The decision of number of cycles of combination therapy beyond 6 was at discretion of the investigator and was included to allow individualisation of therapy to maximise response while minimising exposure. The co-primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and overall response, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete or partial response in relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the end of induction therapy, according to Cheson and colleagues (2007 criteria). The secondary endpoints were complete response after induction therapy and time to event endpoints including time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Analyses were intent to treat in the efficacy cohort and per-treated in the safety population in all patients who received at least one dose of either investigational agent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01995669.
Findings: Between June 03, 2014, and 07 March 2019, we completed planned enrolment, and 66 patients started therapy including 9 patients in phase 1 and 57 patients in phase 2. All patients were evaluated for safety and the 60 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide 20 mg were evaluable for activity. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicities included neutropenia 21% (14/66) and thrombocytopenia 11% (7/66) with no cases of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities included lung infection 8% (5/66), fatigue 8% (5/66) and rash 6% (4/66). By Cheson 2007 criteria, 90% (54/60, 95% CI: 79-96) achieved an overall response at the end of induction meeting the prespecified activity endpoint. Complete responses were seen in 33% (20/60, 95% CI: 22-47) at the end of induction. Median progression free survival, time to progression and overall survival have not been reached after median follow-up of 41.7 months. Estimated 4-year progression free survival rates were 55% (95% CI: 42-73), time to progression of 56% (95% CI: 43-74) and overall survival of 84% (95% CI: 74-95).
Interpretation: Our findings suggest that oral lenalidomide with obinutuzumab is safe and highly active in patients with relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is associated with prolonged remission duration. The study is limited by the lack of a control arm leading to cross-trial comparisons to evaluate activity. Future randomised trials comparing this regime to rituximab and lenalidomide are warranted.
Funding: Genentech and an MD Anderson Core grant.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01995669

References

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Nov;21(11):1118-1131 [PMID: 37935098]
Blood. 2024 Feb 8;143(6):496-506 [PMID: 37879047]
Lancet Haematol. 2019 Aug;6(8):e429-e437 [PMID: 31296423]
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5404-9 [PMID: 19805688]
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68 [PMID: 25113753]
Am J Hematol. 2009 Sep;84(9):553-9 [PMID: 19565649]
Br J Haematol. 2014 Mar;164(6):811-21 [PMID: 24328678]
Blood. 1997 Jun 1;89(11):3909-18 [PMID: 9166827]
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86 [PMID: 17242396]
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 15;14(14):4650-7 [PMID: 18628480]
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):296-303 [PMID: 8558211]
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1188-1199 [PMID: 30897038]
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5107-5117 [PMID: 37506346]
Blood. 2024 Apr 25;143(17):1713-1725 [PMID: 38194692]
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1433-1442 [PMID: 33035457]
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1081-1093 [PMID: 27345636]
Adv Hematol. 2012;2012:513702 [PMID: 22888354]
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):91-103 [PMID: 34895487]
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1244 [PMID: 10561185]
Am J Hematol. 2020 Apr;95(4):362-371 [PMID: 31868245]
Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1563-80 [PMID: 9699230]
Blood. 2009 Nov 19;114(21):4713-20 [PMID: 19786615]
Stat Med. 1995 Feb 28;14(4):357-79 [PMID: 7746977]
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Aug;23(8):1055-1065 [PMID: 35803286]
Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):325-332 [PMID: 34921238]
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1311-8 [PMID: 25439689]

Grants

  1. P30 CA008748/NCI NIH HHS
  2. P30 CA016672/NCI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By