Meta-analysis of RNA interaction profiles of RNA-binding protein using the RBPInper tool.

Joseph A Cogan, Natalia Benova, Rene Kuklinkova, James R Boyne, Chinedu A Anene
Author Information
  1. Joseph A Cogan: School of Biological Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, United Kingdom.
  2. Natalia Benova: Centre for Biomedical Science Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, United Kingdom.
  3. Rene Kuklinkova: Centre for Biomedical Science Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, United Kingdom.
  4. James R Boyne: Centre for Biomedical Science Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, United Kingdom.
  5. Chinedu A Anene: Centre for Biomedical Science Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, United Kingdom. ORCID

Abstract

Motivation: Recent RNA-centric experimental methods have significantly expanded our knowledge of proteins with known RNA-binding functions. However, the complete regulatory network and pathways for many of these RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) in different cellular contexts remain unknown. Although critical to understanding the role of RBPs in health and disease, experimentally mapping the RBP-RNA interactomes in every single context is an impossible task due the cost and manpower required. Additionally, identifying relevant RNAs bound by RBPs is challenging due to their diverse binding modes and function.
Results: To address these challenges, we developed RBP interaction mapper RBPInper an integrative framework that discovers global RBP interactome using statistical data fusion. Experiments on splicing factor proline and glutamine rich (SFPQ) datasets revealed cogent global SFPQ interactome. Several biological processes associated with this interactome were previously linked with SFPQ function. Furthermore, we conducted tests using independent dataset to assess the transferability of the SFPQ interactome to another context. The results demonstrated robust utility in generating interactomes that transfers to unseen cellular context. Overall, RBPInper is a fast and user-friendly method that enables a systems-level understanding of RBP functions by integrating multiple molecular datasets. The tool is designed with a focus on simplicity, minimal dependencies, and straightforward input requirements. This intentional design aims to empower everyday biologists, making it easy for them to incorporate the tool into their research.
Availability and implementation: The source code, documentation, and installation instructions as well as results for use case are freely available at https://github.com/AneneLab/RBPInper. A user can easily compile similar datasets for a target RBP.

References

Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 1;23(13):3428-3441 [PMID: 27879367]
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20 [PMID: 24695404]
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013 Aug;54(7):542-57 [PMID: 23918146]
Nat Commun. 2015 Dec 03;6:10127 [PMID: 26632259]
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Jun 11;2(6):100270 [PMID: 34179848]
Science. 2004 Oct 22;306(5696):636-40 [PMID: 15499007]
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 26;11(1):6980 [PMID: 33772054]
Genomics Inform. 2020 Dec;18(4):e42 [PMID: 33412758]
Nat Rev Genet. 2021 Mar;22(3):185-198 [PMID: 33235359]
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9 [PMID: 25260700]
Trends Biochem Sci. 2020 Jul;45(7):593-603 [PMID: 32531229]
Physiol Rev. 2021 Jul 1;101(3):1309-1370 [PMID: 33000986]
J Evol Biol. 2011 Apr;24(4):926-30 [PMID: 21401770]
Elife. 2021 Jan 21;10: [PMID: 33476259]
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Sep;32(9):903-14 [PMID: 25150838]
Oncogene. 2021 Aug;40(33):5192-5203 [PMID: 34218270]
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 May 19;44(9):3989-4004 [PMID: 27084935]
DNA Repair (Amst). 2011 Mar 7;10(3):252-9 [PMID: 21144806]
Genome Res. 2011 Sep;21(9):1426-37 [PMID: 21803857]
Psychol Bull. 1951 May;48(3):156-8 [PMID: 14834286]
Bioinformatics. 2003;19 Suppl 1:i84-90 [PMID: 12855442]
Neuron. 2017 Apr 19;94(2):322-336.e5 [PMID: 28392072]
Nat Protoc. 2019 Feb;14(2):482-517 [PMID: 30664679]
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019 May;76(10):2015-2030 [PMID: 30725116]
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e91225 [PMID: 24663491]
Bioinform Biol Insights. 2020 Jan 31;14:1177932219899051 [PMID: 32076369]
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Nov 16;43(20):e131 [PMID: 26130709]
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 22;116(4):1195-1200 [PMID: 30610179]
J Biol Chem. 2005 Feb 18;280(7):5205-10 [PMID: 15590677]
Eur Heart J. 2017 May 7;38(18):1380-1388 [PMID: 28064149]
Cell Rep. 2020 Sep 22;32(12):108184 [PMID: 32966782]
RNA. 2002 Sep;8(9):1102-11 [PMID: 12358429]
Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 15;22(22):2825-7 [PMID: 16982708]
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60 [PMID: 25751142]
Genome Biol. 2013;14(9):R95 [PMID: 24020486]
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Jan 20;17 Suppl 2:15 [PMID: 26821531]
Stat Med. 2014 May 20;33(11):1946-78 [PMID: 24399688]
Mol Cell. 2018 Jun 21;70(6):1038-1053.e7 [PMID: 29932899]
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018 May;19(5):327-341 [PMID: 29339797]
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D301-8 [PMID: 21036867]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By