Hydrogen bonding in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol.

Soon Ng, Yaoming Xie, Henry F Schaefer
Author Information
  1. Soon Ng: Department of Chemistry, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ngsoon@um.edu.my.
  2. Yaoming Xie: Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
  3. Henry F Schaefer: Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Abstract

CONTEXT: 2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol (TFE) is known as a membrane mimetic solvent. The IR spectrum, H NMR spectrum, C NMR spin‒lattice relaxation times (T), and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) data are consistent with extensive hydrogen bonding in TFE, but do not lead to structural features of the hydrogen bonding. Hence, DFT computations were carried out. The results predict the existence of a set of H-bonded dimers and trimers. The bond lengths and dihedral angles in these complexes are obtained, together with their dissociation energies. Computations were also performed for the geometry of the two conformers of the isolated monomer. The structure of one of the dimers consists of a 7-member cyclic fragment with a free CFCH side chain. One set of the trimer structures involves the OH of a third monomer H-bonding to one of the F atoms in the CF group of the side chain of this dimer, thereby creating three trimer isomers. A fourth trimer cluster is formed from three monomers in which three OH∙∙∙O bonds create a cyclic fragment with three CFCH side chains. The high dissociation energy (with respect to three monomers) indicates the high stability of the trimer complexes. The structural features of the trimer complexes resemble the structure of a conventional liquid crystal molecule and are postulated to resemble the latter in properties and function in solution, but at a much shorter timescale because of the noncovalent bonding. This hydrogen bonding phenomenon of TFE may be related to its function as a membrane memetic solvent.
METHODS: Initially, IR and NMR spectroscopic methods were used. Standard procedures were followed. For the computations, a hybrid DFT method with empirical dispersion, ωB97X-D, was used. The basis set, 6-311++G**, is of triple-ζ quality, in which polarization functions and diffuse functions were added for all atoms.

Keywords

References

Rajan R, Balaram P (1996) Int J Peptide Protein Res 48:328 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1996.tb00849.x]
Goodman MF, Naider F, Toniolo C (1971) Biopolymers 10:1719 [DOI: 10.1002/bip.360100924]
Nelson JW, Kallenbach NR (1989) Biochemistry 28:5256 [DOI: 10.1021/bi00438a050]
Bruch MD, `Gierasch LM (1990) J Biol Chem 265:3851 [DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39672-3]
Yamamoto Y, Ohkubo T, Kohara A, Tanaka T, Tanaka T, Kikuchi M (1990) Biochemistry 29:8998 [DOI: 10.1021/bi00490a017]
Waterhous DV, Johnson WC Jr (1994) Biochemistry 33:2121 [DOI: 10.1021/bi00174a019]
Yang Y, Zhang X-S, Zhou H-M (1998) Biochem Mosc 63:1307
Yang H-P, Zhou H-M (1997) Biochem Mol Biol Int 43:1297 [PMID: 9442925]
Diaz MD, Fioroni M, Burger K (2002) Chem Eur J 8:16638
Molinaro A, De Castro C, Lanzetta R, Manzo E, Parrilli M (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123:12605 [DOI: 10.1021/ja016471i]
Kaspi J, Rappoport Z (1980) J Am Chem Soc 120:3829 [DOI: 10.1021/ja00531a027]
Qiao RZ, Xu BL, Wang YH (2007) Chin Chem Lett 18:656 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2007.04.036]
Dandia A, Singh R, Joshi J, Kumari S (2014) Mini-Rev Org Chem 11:462 [DOI: 10.2174/1570193X1104140926170237]
Buck M (1998) Q Rev Biophys 31:297 [DOI: 10.1017/S003358359800345X]
Senent ML, Nino A, Munoz-Caro C, Smeyers YG, Dominguez-Gomez R, Orza JM (2002) J Phys Chem A 106:10673 [DOI: 10.1021/jp026542f]
Bako I, Radnai T, Bellisent Funel MC (2004) J Chem Phys 121:12472 [DOI: 10.1063/1.1814637]
Becker ED (1980) High Resolution NMR, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
Harris RK (1986) Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Longman, Harlow, UK pp 107‒116
Chai JD, Head-Gordon M (2008) Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:6615 [DOI: 10.1039/b810189b]
Krishnan R, Binkley JS, Seeger R, Pople JA (1980) J Chem Phys 72:650 [DOI: 10.1063/1.438955]
Clark T, Chandrasekhar J, Spitznagel GW, Schleyer PvR (1983) J Comp Chem 4:294
Shao Y et al (2015) Mol Phys 113:184 [DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2014.952696]
Yamada Y, Noboru Y, Sakaguchi T, Nibu Y (2012) J Phys Chem A 116:2845 [DOI: 10.1021/jp300721r]
Gray GW (1979). In: Luckhurst GR, Gray GW (eds) The molecular physics of liquid crystals. Academic Press, London, pp 1–29
Thomas J, Seifert NA, Jager W, Xu Y (2017) Angew Chem Int Ed 56:1 [DOI: 10.1002/anie.201610955]
Goodby JW, Gray GW (1999) In: Demus D, Goodby JW, Gray GW, Spiess H-W, Vill V (eds) Physical properties of liquid crystals, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim pp 17‒23
Biffinger JC, Kim HW, DiMagno SG (2004) ChemBioChem 5:622 [DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200300910]
Steber AL, Li W, Pate BH, Lesarri A, Perez C (2022) J Phys Chem Lett 3:3770 [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00671]
Thomas M, Lagones TA, Judd M, Morshedi M, O’Mara ML, White NG (2017) Chem Asian J 12:1587 [DOI: 10.1002/asia.201700406]
Ng S, Salleh FM, Xie Y, Schaefer HF III (2012) Phys Org Chem 25:1374 [DOI: 10.1002/poc.3052]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By