Exploring the Learning Curve of Dental Implant Placement Using a Task-Autonomous Robotic System Among Young Dentists From Different Specialties-A Pilot Module Study.

Minjie Zhuang, Jinyan Chen, Baoxin Tao, Meisha Gul, Feng Wang, Yiqun Wu
Author Information
  1. Minjie Zhuang: Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  2. Jinyan Chen: Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  3. Baoxin Tao: Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  4. Meisha Gul: Operative Dentistry Institute, Bahria University Dental College, Bahria University of Health Sciences Campus, Karachi, Pakistan. ORCID
  5. Feng Wang: Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  6. Yiqun Wu: Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The learning curve effect of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (D-CAIS) was observed among inexperienced novice surgeons. The learning curves can provide valuable information for novice surgeons and valid comparisons between new and conventional techniques. Recently, robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (R-CAIS) has shown promise as a novel dental implant surgical technique for both partially and edentulous patients. However, its learning curve remains unknown.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the learning curve of dental implant placement surgery with a task-autonomous robotic system among young dentists with different specialties.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four young dentists (mean age: 25.3 ± 1.5 years at the beginning of their first attempt) with equal representation of males and females and with different specialties participated in this study. None of the participants had prior experience in R-CAIS. Each operator placed eight implants over eight attempts using a semi-active task-autonomous robotic system. Among the eight implants, four were straight lateral incisor implants, and four were 30°-tilted premolar implants. The implants were placed in each dental quadrant of the maxillary and mandibular jaw modules. The operation time was recorded. Coronal, apical, and angular deviations between the planned and actual sites of implant placement were measured by merging preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The mean time for implant placement was associated with the number of attempts (p < 0.01). The time taken for the second attempt was significantly shorter than that of the first attempt (33.26 vs. 30.47 min; p < 0.001) then it plateaued. Three-dimensional (3D) angular (p = 0.31), coronal deviation (p = 0.26), and apical deviation (p = 0.06) did not differ significantly among attempts. The mean values and standard deviations of 3D coronal deviation, 3D apical deviation, and 3D angular deviation were 0.71 ± 0.31 mm, 0.72 ± 0.30 mm, and 0.94 ± 0.58°, respectively. Neither the position of the jaw (p > 0.59) nor the tilt angle of the implant (straight or 30°-tilted, p > 0.85) was related to implant placement accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Dentists quickly learned the basic workflow of R-CAIS and thus facilitated the clinicians in the mastery of implant placement on edentulous jaw modules, leading to a comparable operating speed and high precision. Moreover, the accuracy of placement of straight and tilted implants in both the maxilla and mandible with R-CAIS was satisfactory.

Keywords

References

K. C. Kopp, A. H. Koslow, and O. S. Abdo, “Predictable Implant Placement With a Diagnostic/Surgical Template and Advanced Radiographic Imaging,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 89, no. 6 (2003): 611–615, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022‐3913(03)00198‐7.
J. D'haese, J. Ackhurst, D. Wismeijer, H. De Bruyn, and A. Tahmaseb, “Current State of the Art of Computer‐Guided Implant Surgery,” Periodontology 2000 73, no. 1 (2017): 121–133, https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12175.
I. Sailer, D. Karasan, A. Todorovic, M. Ligoutsikou, and B. E. Pjetursson, “Prosthetic Failures in Dental Implant Therapy,” Periodontology 2000 88, no. 1 (2022): 130–144, https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12416.
X. Wang, E. Shaheen, S. Shujaat, et al., “Influence of Experience on Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Comparison of Freehand, Static Guided and Dynamic Navigation Approaches,” International Journal of Implant Dentistry 8, no. 1 (October 2022): 42, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729‐022‐00441‐3.
J. Abduo and D. Lau, “Accuracy of Static Computer‐Assisted Implant Placement in Long Span Edentulous Area by Novice Implant Clinicians: A Cross‐Sectional In Vitro Study Comparing Fully‐Guided, Pilot‐Guided, and Freehand Implant Placement Protocols,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 23, no. 3 (2021): 361–372, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12998.
F. Younes, J. Cosyn, T. De Bruyckere, R. Cleymaet, E. Bouckaert, and A. Eghbali, “A Randomized Controlled Study on the Accuracy of Free‐Handed, Pilot‐Drill Guided and Fully Guided Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Patients,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology 45, no. 6 (2018): 721–732, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12897.
G. E. Romanos, R. Delgado‐Ruiz, and A. Sculean, “Concepts for Prevention of Complications in Implant Therapy,” Periodontology 2000 81, no. 1 (2019): 7–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12278.
G. Greenstein, J. Cavallaro, G. Romanos, and D. Tarnow, “Clinical Recommendations for Avoiding and Managing Surgical Complications Associated With Implant Dentistry: A Review,” Journal of Periodontology 79, no. 8 (2008): 1317–1329, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070067.
C. H. F. Hämmerle and D. Tarnow, “The Etiology of Hard‐ and Soft‐Tissue Deficiencies at Dental Implants: A Narrative Review,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology 45, no. Suppl 20 (2018): S267–S277, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12955.
X. Yu, B. Tao, F. Wang, and Y. Wu, “Accuracy Assessment of Dynamic Navigation During Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Clinical Studies in the Last 10 Years,” Journal of Dentistry 135 (2023): 104567, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104567.
P. S. Mozer, “Accuracy and Deviation Analysis of Static and Robotic Guided Implant Surgery: A Case Study,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 35, no. 5 (2020): e86–e90, https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8231.
W. Wang, H. Xu, D. Mei, et al., “Accuracy of the Yakebot Dental Implant Robotic System Versus Fully Guided Static Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery Template in Edentulous Jaw Implantation: A Preliminary Clinical Study,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 26, no. 2 (2024): 309–316, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13278.
S. Jia, G. Wang, Y. Zhao, and X. Wang, “Accuracy of an Autonomous Dental Implant Robotic System Versus Static Guide‐Assisted Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Study,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 6 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.027.
T. Su, J. Zhao, and W. Teng, “An In Vitro Study on the Comparison of Implant Accuracy of Freehand, Implant Surgical Guide, and Dental Implant Robot,” Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology 28, no. 4 (2023): 244–249, https://doi.org/10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.08.007.
B. Tao, Y. Feng, X. Fan, et al., “Accuracy of Dental Implant Surgery Using Dynamic Navigation and Robotic Systems: An In Vitro Study,” Journal of Dentistry 123 (2022): 104170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170.
J. Chen, X. Bai, Y. Ding, et al., “Comparison the Accuracy of a Novel Implant Robot Surgery and Dynamic Navigation System in Dental Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Pilot Study,” BMC Oral Health 23, no. 1 (March 2023): 179, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903‐023‐02873‐8.
J. Chen, M. Zhuang, B. Tao, Y. Wu, L. Ye, and F. Wang, “Accuracy of Immediate Dental Implant Placement With Task‐Autonomous Robotic System and Navigation System: An In Vitro Study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 29 (May 2023): 973–983, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14104.
S. L. Bolding and U. N. Reebye, “Accuracy of Haptic Robotic Guidance of Dental Implant Surgery for Completely Edentulous Arches,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 128, no. 4 (2022): 639–647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.048.
S. Z. Bai, N. Ren, Z. H. Feng, et al., “Animal Experiment on the Accuracy of the Autonomous Dental Implant Robotic System,” Chinese Journal of Stomatology 56, no. 2 (2021): 170–174, https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144‐20210107‐00008.
Y. Wu, S. Q. Zou, and X. Wang, “Preliminary Application of Dental Implant Robot in Dental Implant Operations,” Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 21, no. 9 (2021): 787–791, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009‐6604.2021.
S. Yang, J. Chen, A. Li, K. Deng, P. Li, and S. Xu, “Accuracy of Autonomous Robotic Surgery for Single‐Tooth Implant Placement: A Case Series,” Journal of Dentistry 132 (2023): 104451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104451.
W. Chen, K. A. Al‐Taezi, C. H. Chu, et al., “Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement With a Robotic System in Partially Edentulous Patients: A Prospective, Single‐Arm Clinical Trial,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 34, no. 7 (2023): 707–718, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14083.
Z. Li, R. Xie, S. Bai, and Y. Zhao, “Implant Placement With an Autonomous Dental Implant Robot: A Clinical Report,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.014.
S. C. Qiao, X. Y. Wu, J. Y. Shi, M. S. Tonetti, and H. C. Lai, “Accuracy and Safety of a Haptic Operated and Machine Vision Controlled Collaborative Robot for Dental Implant Placement: A Translational Study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 34, no. 8 (2023): 839–849, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14112.
S. Yang, J. Chen, A. Li, P. Li, and S. Xu, “Autonomous Robotic Surgery for Immediately Loaded Implant‐Supported Maxillary Full‐Arch Prosthesis: A Case Report,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 21 (November 2022): 6594, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216594.
Z. Cao, C. Qin, S. Fan, et al., “Pilot Study of a Surgical Robot System for Zygomatic Implant Placement,” Medical Engineering & Physics 75 (2020): 72–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.07.020.
H. Deng, H. Bian, Y. Liang, J. Cao, Y. Sun, and Y. Li, “Semi‐Autonomous Two‐Stage Dental Robotic Technique for Zygomatic Implants: An In Vitro Study,” Journal of Dentistry 138 (2023): 104687, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104687.
H. Deng, H. Bian, C. Li, and Y. Li, “Autonomous Dental Robotic Surgery for Zygomatic Implants: A Two‐Stage Technique,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 9 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.033.
A. Pimkhaokham, J. Chow, A. Pozzi, S. Arunjaroensuk, K. Subbalehka, and N. Mattheos, “Computer‐Assisted and Robotic Implant Surgery: Assessing the Outcome Measures of Accuracy and Educational Implications,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 23 (November 2023): 939–953, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14213.
S. Sharif and A. Afsar, “Learning Curve and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery,” World Neurosurgery 119 (2018): 472–478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.094.
K. Subramonian and G. Muir, “The ‘learning Curve’ in Surgery: What Is It, How Do We Measure It and Can We Influence It?,” BJU International 93, no. 9 (2004): 1173–1174, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464‐410X.2004.04891.x.
W. Wang, M. Zhuang, S. Li, et al., “Exploring Training Dental Implant Placement Using Static or Dynamic Devices Among Dental Students,” European Journal of Dental Education 27, no. 3 (2023): 438–448, https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12825.
M. Cassetta, F. Altieri, M. Giansanti, M. Bellardini, G. Brandetti, and L. Piccoli, “Is There a Learning Curve in Static Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery? A Prospective Clinical Study,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 49, no. 10 (2020): 1335–1342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.007.
F. Valente, G. Schiroli, and A. Sbrenna, “Accuracy of Computer‐Aided Oral Implant Surgery: A Clinical and Radiographic Study,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 24, no. 2 (2009): 234–242.
J. Golob Deeb, S. Bencharit, C. K. Carrico, et al., “Exploring Training Dental Implant Placement Using Computer‐Guided Implant Navigation System for Predoctoral Students: A Pilot Study,” European Journal of Dental Education 23, no. 4 (2019): 415–423, https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12447.
T. M. Sun, T. H. Lan, C. Y. Pan, and H. E. Lee, “Dental Implant Navigation System Guide the Surgery Future,” Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 34, no. 1 (2018): 56–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.011.
Z. Xu, L. Zhou, M. Zheng, et al., “The Effect of Implant Surgery Experience on the Learning Curve of a Dynamic Navigation System: An In Vitro Study,” BMC Oral Health 23, no. 1 (February 2023): 89, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903‐023‐02792‐8.
Y. Feng, Y. Yao, and X. Yang, “Effect of a Dynamic Navigation Device on the Accuracy of Implant Placement in the Completely Edentulous Mandible: An In Vitro Study,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 130, no. 5 (2023): 731–737, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.012.
M. S. Block, R. W. Emery, K. Lank, and J. Ryan, “Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 32, no. 1 (2017): 92–99, https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5004.
Y. Wu, F. Wang, S. Fan, and J. K. Chow, “Robotics in Dental Implantology,” Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 31, no. 3 (2019): 513–518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.013.
X. Y. Wang, L. Liu, M. S. Guan, Q. Liu, T. Zhao, and H. B. Li, “The Accuracy and Learning Curve of Active and Passive Dynamic Navigation‐Guided Dental Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study,” Journal of Dentistry 124 (2022): 104240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104240.
M. Cassetta and M. Bellardini, “How Much Does Experience in Guided Implant Surgery Play a Role in Accuracy? A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 46, no. 7 (2017): 922–930, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.010.
M. Cassetta, A. Di Mambro, M. Giansanti, L. V. Stefanelli, and C. Cavallini, “The Intrinsic Error of a Stereolithographic Surgical Template in Implant Guided Surgery,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 42, no. 2 (2013): 264–275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.010.
Z. Xu, Y. Xiao, L. Zhou, et al., “Accuracy and Efficiency of Robotic Dental Implant Surgery With Different Human‐Robot Interactions: An In Vitro Study,” Journal of Dentistry 137 (2023): 104642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104642.
B. Tao, Y. Shen, Y. Sun, W. Huang, F. Wang, and Y. Wu, “Comparative Accuracy of Cone‐Beam CT and Conventional Multislice Computed Tomography for Real‐Time Navigation in Zygomatic Implant Surgery,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 22, no. 6 (2020): 747–755, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12958.
W. Zhou, S. Fan, F. Wang, W. Huang, F. Z. Jamjoom, and Y. Wu, “A Novel Extraoral Registration Method for a Dynamic Navigation System Guiding Zygomatic Implant Placement in Patients With Maxillectomy Defects,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50, no. 1 (2021): 116–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.018.

Grants

  1. 2022ZZ01017/Shanghai's Top Priority Research Center
  2. SHDC2020CR3049B/Clinical Research Plan of SHDC
  3. 2019-I2M-5-037/CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS)
  4. YG2021QN72/Combined Engineering and Medical Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  5. KQHX2022-07/Horizontal Project of the National Center for Clinical Research of Oral Diseases
  6. 1781-2023/the International Team for Implantology

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Young Adult
Adult
Education, Dental
Learning Curve
Dental Implantation
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Pilot Projects

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By