Comparison of the Quality of Lymphatic Vessel Images Obtained Using Two Photoacoustic Imaging Systems.

Yushi Suzuki, Hiroki Kajita, Marika Otaki, Shiho Watanabe, Keisuke Okabe, Hisashi Sakuma, Yoshifumi Takatsume, Yuta Asano, Shigeyoshi Soga, Nobuaki Imanishi, Imari Sato, Masahiro Jinzaki, Kazuo Kishi
Author Information
  1. Yushi Suzuki: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. Hiroki Kajita: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Marika Otaki: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Shiho Watanabe: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Keisuke Okabe: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Hisashi Sakuma: Tokyo Dental Colledge Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
  7. Yoshifumi Takatsume: Department of Anatomy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  8. Yuta Asano: National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan.
  9. Shigeyoshi Soga: Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  10. Nobuaki Imanishi: Department of Anatomy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  11. Imari Sato: National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan.
  12. Masahiro Jinzaki: Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  13. Kazuo Kishi: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) can evaluate lymphatic vessels with a high resolution (0.2 mm) compared with other methods. LUB0, a new PAI device that is smaller than the PAI-05 used since 2020 (both from Luxonus, Inc.), has been introduced. We aimed to determine the imaging capability of LUB0 by comparing it with that of PAI-05. Two healthy individuals and 4 patients with lymphedema underwent PAI using PAI-05 and LUB0. Each participant was subcutaneously injected with indocyanine green to visualize the lymphatic vessels. PAI was performed after confirming that the lymphatic flow had moved to the central part of the body using a near-infrared camera. Four physicians selected a device with superior image clarity based on a 5-point scale. LUB0 produced sharper images of lymphatic vessels and veins than PAI-05. The physicians scored 3.0 ± 1.2 with PAI-05 and 3.9 ± 0.9 with LUB0 ( < 0.05), implying that LUB0 provided significantly clearer images. Additionally, the dermal backflow image obtained using LUB0 from a patient with lymphedema depicted the precollector lymphatic vessels more clearly. LUB0 occupies approximately one-seventh of the footprint of PAI-05 and requires a shorter imaging time (5 minutes) than PAI-05 (10 minutes). The PAI model LUB0 improved the visualization of lymphatic vessels and veins, allowing better detection and evaluation of lymphatic vessels.

References

Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):469-474 [PMID: 32096709]
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Nov;10(6):1318-1324.e2 [PMID: 35995329]
Microsurgery. 2010 Sep;30(6):437-42 [PMID: 20878726]
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Dec 13;49(6):773-781 [PMID: 36523915]
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):35 [PMID: 31038411]
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May;127(5):1979-1986 [PMID: 21532424]
F1000Res. 2018 Nov 19;7:1813 [PMID: 30854189]
Ultrason Imaging. 2022 May;44(2-3):96-104 [PMID: 35549598]
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 17;9(3): [PMID: 32192039]
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Mar;10(2):454-462.e1 [PMID: 34352419]
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;115(1):18-22 [PMID: 27377990]
Microsurgery. 2024 Mar;44(3):e31153 [PMID: 38376254]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By