Teacher-Student Interactions of Autistic Adolescents: Relationships between Teacher Autonomy Support, Structure, Involvement and Student Engagement. - National Genomics Data Center (CNCB-NGDC)

Advanced Search

Teacher-Student Interactions of Autistic Adolescents: Relationships between Teacher Autonomy Support, Structure, Involvement and Student Engagement.

Fernanda Esqueda Villegas, Steffie van der Steen, Marijn van Dijk, David Alejandro Esqueda Villegas, Alexander Minnaert

Author Information

Fernanda Esqueda Villegas: Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen, 9712 TS, The Netherlands. m.f.esqueda.villegas@rug.nl. ORCID
Steffie van der Steen: Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen, 9712 TS, The Netherlands. ORCID
Marijn van Dijk: Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen, 9712 TS, The Netherlands. ORCID
David Alejandro Esqueda Villegas: Department of Integral Postgraduate Studies in Social Sciences, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies in Social Sciences, University of Sonora, Blvd. Luis Encinas J, Av. Rosales and Centro, Hermosillo, Sonora, 83000, Mexico. ORCID
Alexander Minnaert: Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen, 9712 TS, The Netherlands. ORCID

PMID: 39948295 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-025-06723-0

The extent to which autistic students are provided with autonomy-support, structure and involvement during the teacher-student interaction has been under-researched. Few studies have focused on autistic secondary school students and even fewer have used observations to analyze their interactions. In this research, we aimed to understand the interaction dynamics between autistic students and their teachers in the Netherlands and Mexico; two countries committed to inclusive education. Six teacher-student dyads from five mainstream secondary schools in the Netherlands and seven teacher-student dyads from one school in Mexico participated. We used a fine-grained observational method to describe the classroom interactions, systematically coded from the lens of Self-Determination Theory. To study the interaction as a whole and co-occurring teacher and student behaviors (rather than breaking it down into separate parts), we used State Space Grids. Teacher-student interactions varied widely. In general, Dutch and Mexican teachers provided much structure in the classroom, which (in many cases) coincided with the active engagement of autistic students. At the same time, autistic students in both countries received little autonomy-support. However, when these students received autonomy-support, they responded with more engagement. In contrast, both engaged and disengaged student behaviors occurred when the teacher showed involvement. The desired patterns of interaction were not observed in all teacher-student pairs. Our findings indicate that teachers in both countries are missing opportunities to be autonomy-supportive. This contextual factor was minimally observed in the teacher-student interactions, particularly when compared to the levels of structure and involvement provided during lessons.

Autism spectrum disorder Classroom observations Inclusive education Self-determination theory State space grids Student engagement

Blacher, J., Howell, E., Lauderdale-Littin, S., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., & Laugeson, E. A. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder and the student teacher relationship: A comparison study with peers with intellectual disability and typical development. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(3), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.12.008 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2013.12.008]

Bos, J., & Steenbeek, H. (2017). Mediacoder: A simple application for coding behavior within media files. University of Groningen.

Breault, R. A. (2013). She was Great, but … examining preservice recollections of favorite and most effective teachers. The Professional Educator, 37(1).

Caplan, B., Feldman, M., Eisenhower, A., … Blacher, J. (2016). Student–teacher relationships for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Risk and protective factors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(12), 3653–3666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2915-1

Carrington, S., Templeton, E., & Papinczak, T. (2003). Adolescents With Asperger Syndrome and Perceptions of Friendship. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576030180040201

Cassimos, D. C., Polychronopoulou, S. A., Tripsianis, G. I., & Syriopoulou-Delli, C. K. (2015). Views and attitudes of teachers on the educational integration of students with autism spectrum disorders. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.794870 [DOI: 10.3109/17518423.2013.794870]

Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Denessen, E., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2021). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: An observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education, 36(6), 754–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184 [DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184]

Domen, J., Hornstra, L., Weijers, D., van der Veen, I., & Peetsma, T. (2020). Differentiated need support by teachers: Student-specific provision of autonomy and structure and relations with student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12302 [DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12302]

Emam, M. M., & Farrell, P. (2009). Tensions experienced by teachers and their views of support for pupils with autism spectrum disorders in mainstream schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903223070 [DOI: 10.1080/08856250903223070]

Esqueda Villegas, F., van der Steen, S. & Minnaert, A. (2024). Interactions Between Teachers and Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mainstream Secondary Education: Fundamental, yet Under-Researched. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11, 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-022-00346-2

Feldman, M., Maye, M., Levinson, S., Carter, A., Blacher, J., & Eisenhower, A. (2019). Student–teacher relationships of children with autism spectrum disorder: Distinct contributions of language domains. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 89, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.03.006 [DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.03.006]

Forlin, C., Cedillo, I. G., Romero-Contreras, S., Fletcher, T., & Rodríguez Hernández, H. J. (2010). Inclusion in Mexico: Ensuring supportive attitudes by newly graduated teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(7), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603111003778569 [DOI: 10.1080/13603111003778569]

Francis, G. L., Lavin, C. E., Sanchez, J., Reed, A. S., & Mason, L. (2021). Inclusive Education definitions and practices: Exploring perspectives of Education professionals in Mexico City. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12356 [DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12356]

García-Cedillo, I., Romero-Contreras, S., & Ramos-Abadie, L. (2015). Where Do Mexico and Chile Stand on Inclusive Education? International Journal of Special Education, 30(2), 145-156. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1094874.pdf

Gobierno de México (2022a). Discapacidad y derecho a la educación en México [Disability and the right to education in Mexico]. Comisión Nacional para la Mejora Continua de la Educación. https://joomlatest.mejoredu.gob.mx/images/publicaciones/Discapacidad-de-2022.pdf

Gobierno de México. (2022b). Indicadores nacionales de la mejora continua de la educación en México. Cifras del ciclo escolar 2020–2021 [National indicators of continuous improvement in Education in Mexico. Figures from the 2020–2021 school year]. Comisión Nacional para la Mejora Continua de la Educación. https://www.mejoredu.gob.mx/images/publicaciones/indicadores-nacionales-2022.pdf

Goodall, C. (2019). There is more flexibility to meet my needs’: Educational experiences of autistic young people in Mainstream and Alternative Education Provision. Support for Learning, 34(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12236 [DOI: 10.1111/1467-9604.12236]

Heyworth, M., Brett, S., Houting, J., Magiati, I., Steward, R., Urbanowicz, A., Stears, M., & Pellicano, E. (2021). It just fits my needs better: Autistic students and parents’ experiences of learning from home during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/23969415211057681

Hill, L. (2014). Some of it I haven’t told anybody else’: Using photo elicitation to explore the experiences of secondary school education from the perspective of young people with a diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder. Educational and Child Psychology, 31(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2014.31.1.79 [DOI: 10.53841/bpsecp.2014.31.1.79]

Hollenstein, T. (2013). State space grids: Depicting dynamics across development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5007-8 [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5007-8]

Humphrey, N., & Lewis, S. (2008). `Make me normal’: The views and experiences of pupils on the autistic spectrum in mainstream secondary schools. Autism, 12(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361307085267 [DOI: 10.1177/1362361307085267]

Jahromi, L. B., Bryce, C. I., & Swanson, J. (2013). The importance of self-regulation for the school and peer engagement of children with high-functioning autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.08.012 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2012.08.012]

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682 [DOI: 10.1037/a0019682]

Lavin, C. E., Francis, G. L., Mason, L. H., & LeSueur, R. F. (2022). Perceptions of Inclusive Education in Mexico City: An exploratory study. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 69(3), 1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1749572 [DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2020.1749572]

Loopers, J. H., Kupers, W. E., de Boer, A. A., & Minnaert, A. E. M. G. (2023). Changes in need-supportive teaching over the course of one school year: Differences between students with special educational needs and typically developing students. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(5), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2159279 [DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2022.2159279]

Loopers, J., Kupers, E., de Boer, A., & Minnaert, A. (2024). The relationship between basic psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation: The role of individual differences and special educational needs. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(1), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00683-8 [DOI: 10.1007/s10212-023-00683-8]

Losh, A., Eisenhower, A., & Blacher, J. (2022). Impact of student-teacher relationship quality on classroom behavioral engagement for young students on the autism spectrum. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.102027

Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C., Stroet, K., & Bosker, R. (2012). Observed lesson structure during the first year of secondary education: Exploration of change and link with academic engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.005 [DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.03.005]

Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C., Stroet, K., & Bosker, R. (2013). Changes in teachers’ involvement Versus rejection and links with academic motivation during the First Year of secondary education: A multilevel growth curve analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(9), 1348–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9921-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s10964-013-9921-9]

Menninga, A., van Geert, P., van Vondel, S., Steenbeek, H., & van Dijk, M. (2022). Teacher-Student Interaction patterns change during an early science teaching intervention. Research in Science Education, 52(5), 1497–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09997-3 [DOI: 10.1007/s11165-021-09997-3]

Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2007). The education system in the Netherlands 2007. Dutch Eurydice Unit, Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.

OECD. (2016). Terms of reference: OECD education policy review of the Netherlands. Netherlands 2016: Foundations for the future. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264257658-11-en

OECD. (2018). Mexico. Education Policy Outlook 2018: Putting Student Learning at the Centre. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301528-27-en

OECD. (2019a). An overview of the education system in Mexico. Strong foundations for quality and equity in Mexican schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c0daae73-en

OECD. (2019b). Mexico, in Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f12055c8-en

Pennings, H. J. M., & Hollenstein, T. (2020). Teacher-student interactions and teacher interpersonal styles: A State Space Grid Analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 382–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1578724 [DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2019.1578724]

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218. [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209]

Roorda, D. L., Zee, M., Bosman, R. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2021). Student–teacher relationships and school engagement: Comparing boys from special education for autism spectrum disorders and regular education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101277

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2018). Self-determination theory: Basic Psychological needs in motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford.

Saggers, B., Hwang, Y. S., & Mercer, K. L. (2011). Your Voice counts: Listening to the Voice of High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 35(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.35.2.173 [DOI: 10.1375/ajse.35.2.173]

Santiago, P., McGregor, I., Nusche, D., Ravela, P., & Toledo, D. (2012). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Mexico 2012. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264172647-en

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581. [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571]

Smit, N., van Dijk, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (2022). The complex dynamics of adaptive teaching: Observing teacher-student interaction in the language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0023 [DOI: 10.1515/iral-2021-0023]

Snikkers-Mommer, S., Hoekman, J., Mayo, A., & Minnaert, A. (2024). Triggered and maintained engagement with learning among gifted children in primary education [Original Research]. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1164498

Soemer, A., Idsardi, H. M., Minnaert, A., & Schiefele, U. (2019). Mind wandering and reading comprehension in secondary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101778

Sproston, K., Sedgewick, F., & Crane, L. (2017). Autistic girls and school exclusion: Perspectives of students and their parents. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941517706172

Stephenson, J., Browne, L., Carter, M., Clark, T., Costley, D., Martin, J., Williams, K., Bruck, S., Davies, L., & Sweller, N. (2021). Facilitators and barriers to inclusion of students with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Parent, teacher, and principal perspectives. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 45(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2020.12 [DOI: 10.1017/jsi.2020.12]

Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M. C., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 9, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003 [DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003]

Tesfaye, R., Courchesne, V., Mirenda, P., Mitchell, W., Nicholas, D., Singh, I., Zwaigenbaum, L., & Elsabbagh, M. (2023). Autism voices: Perspectives of the needs, challenges, and hopes for the future of autistic youth. Autism, 27(4), 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221132108 [DOI: 10.1177/13623613221132108]

Turner, J. C., & Christensen, A. L. (2020). Using state space grids to analyze teacher–student interaction over time. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1793763 [DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2020.1793763]

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

Inspectorate of Education (2023). The State of Education 2023. https://english.onderwijsinspectie.nl/documents/annual-reports/2023/5/31/state-of-education-2023

Lamey, A., Hollenstein, T., Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (2004). GridWare (version 1.15)[Computer software].

Loopers, J. H. (2022). Unravelling the dynamics of intrinsic motivation of students with and without special educational needs. [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen].

Pennings, H. J. M., & Mainhard, T. (2016). Analyzing Teacher–Student Interactions with State Space Grids. In M. Koopmans & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex Dynamical Systems in Education: Concepts, Methods and Applications (pp. 233–271). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_12

Shea, N., Millea, M. A., & Diehl, J. J. (2013). Perceived Autonomy Support in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autism-open access, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7890.1000114

Stroet, K. (2014). Studying motivation in classrooms: effects of teaching practices on early adolescents’ motivation [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen].

Trevino, G. (2015). Serving the Poor Differently: The Effects of Private and Public Schools on Children’s Academic Achievement in Basic Education in Mexico.[Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education]. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/14121808

van Doodewaard, C., & Knoppers, A. (2021). Shaping students for inclusion: A gift and a project. Dutch preservice teachers and the complexity of inclusive teaching practices in physical education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1991493

Zajic, M. C., Solari, E. J., McIntyre, N. S., Lerro, L., & Mundy, P. C. (2020). Task engagement during narrative writing in school-age children with autism spectrum disorder compared to peers with and without attentional difficulties. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101590

Zee, M., de Bree, E., Hakvoort, B., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2020). Exploring relationships between teachers and students with diagnosed disabilities: A multi-informant approach. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101101

Zeinstra, L., Kupers, E., Loopers, J., & de Boer, A. (2023). Real-time teacher-student interactions: The dynamic interplay between need supportive teaching and student engagement over the course of one school year. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103906

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología/Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen/Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

Journal Article