Shifting Patterns in Primary Care Telehealth Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries and Providers.

Yunxi Zhang, Lincy S Lal, Saurabh Chandra, John Michael Swint
Author Information
  1. Yunxi Zhang: University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA. ORCID
  2. Lincy S Lal: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
  3. Saurabh Chandra: University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
  4. John Michael Swint: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telehealth adoption, but disparities in its utilization persist. This study examines primary care patient sociodemographic characteristics, telehealth utilization patterns, and provider adoptions before and during the pandemic.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed data from Mississippi Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled in Parts A, B, and D who accessed primary care services from 2019 to 2021.
RESULTS: Among 201 677 Medicare beneficiaries accessing primary care, 1364 used telehealth before the pandemic, compared to 73 994 during the pandemic. Telehealth utilization shifted during the pandemic to younger, female, White beneficiaries, and those enrolled in Medicare due to disability or End Stage Renal Disease. During the pandemic, telehealth users exhibited higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and Social Vulnerability Index but lower Digital Divide Index scores compared to non-telehealth users. Telehealth was associated with more primary care visits, broader access, and higher continuity of care. Primary care physicians increased their share of telehealth services to 39%, while specialties such as neuropsychiatry and psychiatry showed the highest adoption rates, reaching 55% and 38%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth demonstrated a growing role in primary care during the pandemic. Future efforts must address digital divides and advance health equity when integrating telehealth into primary care services.

Keywords

References

Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:432892 [PMID: 24278694]
JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):2015-6 [PMID: 27163991]
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240131 [PMID: 38517424]
Telemed J E Health. 2023 Sep;29(9):1421-1425 [PMID: 36716266]
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Nov 10;22:e68 [PMID: 34753531]
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9 [PMID: 16224307]
South Med J. 2014 Feb;107(2):87-90 [PMID: 24926673]
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):568-74 [PMID: 14530228]
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502 [PMID: 16202000]
Med Care. 2023 Apr 1;61(Suppl 1):S62-S69 [PMID: 36893420]
Med Care. 1977 Apr;15(4):347-9 [PMID: 859364]
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):349-358 [PMID: 33523745]
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 16;25:e44209 [PMID: 36787223]
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2347686 [PMID: 38180762]
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Nov;1(7):e330-e331 [PMID: 33323207]

MeSH Term

Humans
Primary Health Care
United States
Female
Medicare
Telemedicine
Male
COVID-19
Retrospective Studies
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Mississippi
Health Services Accessibility
SARS-CoV-2
Patient Acceptance of Health Care

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By