Difference between revisions of "Os01g0733200"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
OsHsfC1b plays a role in ABA-mediated salt stress tolerance in rice<ref name="ref1" />.The role of class C HSFs in stress response is currently unknown;however, expression patterns of class C HSF genes from rice suggest, in addition to a role in the heat shock response, a participation in non-thermal stress responses such as salt,drought and oxidative stress.In particular, OsHsfC1b and OsHsf2b are highly responsive to salt and drought stress<ref name="ref2" />. | OsHsfC1b plays a role in ABA-mediated salt stress tolerance in rice<ref name="ref1" />.The role of class C HSFs in stress response is currently unknown;however, expression patterns of class C HSF genes from rice suggest, in addition to a role in the heat shock response, a participation in non-thermal stress responses such as salt,drought and oxidative stress.In particular, OsHsfC1b and OsHsf2b are highly responsive to salt and drought stress<ref name="ref2" />. | ||
| − | Furthermore, OsHsfC1b is involved in the response to osmotic stress and is required for plant growth under non-stress conditions.In contrast to class A HSFs, OsHsfC1b acts as a positive regulator of growth under standard growth conditions. We therefore propose that class C HSFs play an opposite role to class A members in plant growth control. | + | Furthermore, OsHsfC1b is involved in the response to osmotic stress and is required for plant growth under non-stress conditions<ref name="ref1" />.In contrast to class A HSFs, OsHsfC1b acts as a positive regulator of growth under standard growth conditions. We therefore propose that class C HSFs play an opposite role to class A members in plant growth control. |
===Expression=== | ===Expression=== | ||
Revision as of 03:56, 31 May 2014
The rice OsHsfC1b gene is well known as the "heat shock transcription factor gene" and regulates salt tolerance and development in Oryza sativa ssp. japonica.
Contents
Annotated Information
Function
OsHsfC1b plays a role in ABA-mediated salt stress tolerance in rice[1].The role of class C HSFs in stress response is currently unknown;however, expression patterns of class C HSF genes from rice suggest, in addition to a role in the heat shock response, a participation in non-thermal stress responses such as salt,drought and oxidative stress.In particular, OsHsfC1b and OsHsf2b are highly responsive to salt and drought stress[2].
Furthermore, OsHsfC1b is involved in the response to osmotic stress and is required for plant growth under non-stress conditions[1].In contrast to class A HSFs, OsHsfC1b acts as a positive regulator of growth under standard growth conditions. We therefore propose that class C HSFs play an opposite role to class A members in plant growth control.
Expression
Expression of OsHsfC1b was induced by salt, mannitol and ABA, but not by H2O2[1].OsHsfC1b was significantly induced in roots after 30 min treatment with salt, mannitol and ABA. In addition, OsHsfC1b was also significantly upregulated in leaves after 30 min of salt treatment. After 3 h,the expression level of OsHsfC1b in roots was significantly increased by salt and ABA, but not by mannitol. Again,salt stress resulted in an upregulation of expression in leaves. H2O2 had no effect on OsHsfC1b transcript level.
OsHsfC1b is localized in the nucleus in the absence of stress,which indicates that a stress-dependent modification is not required for nuclear accumulation.
Evolution
To determine the phylogenetic relationship among the OsHsfs, neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees were constructed using the amino acid sequences of DBD, the HR-A/B region, and the linker between them [3]. As expected, the classes A, B and C Hsfs formed three individual clusters. Furthermore, the class A Hsfs were divided into two sub-clusters. In a previous study, the N-terminal part and C-terminal part of DBD and HR-A/B regions were used separately to draw phylogenetic trees. Although most proteins fixed their positions in the different phylogenetic trees, a few Hsfs changed theirpositions (Nover et al., 2001). Similar phenomenon was also observed on the OsHsfs (data not shown). A more convinced relationship of the Hsfs was revealed by combining the DBD, HR-A/B, and the flexible linker between DBD and HR-A/B.
Knowledge Extension
A typical Hsf protein contains a modular structure with an N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD), an adjacent bipartite oligomerization domain composed of heptads repeat of hydrophobic amino acid residues (HR-A/B), a nuclear localization signal (NLS) essential for nuclear uptake of the protein, a nuclear export signal (NES),and in many cases a less conserved C-terminal activation domain (CTAD) rich in aromatic, hydrophobic and acidic amino acids (AHA) that have been reported to be crucial for activation function[4].Based on the conservative DBD and the HR-A/B regions, 21 putative Hsfs from the Arabidopsis,23 from rice, and 18 from tomato have been identified through the genome-wide analysis. Plant Hsf gene family is divided into three classes, HsfA, HsfB, and HsfC, according to their protein structures[4].HsfA and HsfC have insertions of 21 and 7 amino acids, between the hydrophobic regions HR-A and HR-B,respectively. HsfB and HsfC are also characterized bylack of AHA motifs in their C-terminal regions(CTRs).
Labs working on this gene
Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Muehlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
CIRAD, UMR AGAP, Avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
National Center for Gene Research and Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 500 Caobao Road, Shanghai 200233, China
State Key Lab of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, 359 Tiyuchang Road, Hangzhou 30016, China
Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
Biocenter of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
References
Structured Information
| Gene Name |
Os01g0733200 |
|---|---|
| Description |
Similar to Heat shock transcription factor 29 (Fragment) |
| Version |
NM_001050695.1 GI:115439760 GeneID:4324158 |
| Length |
1210 bp |
| Definition |
Oryza sativa Japonica Group Os01g0733200, complete gene. |
| Source |
Oryza sativa Japonica Group ORGANISM Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Eukaryota; Viridiplantae; Streptophyta; Embryophyta; Tracheophyta;
Spermatophyta; Magnoliophyta; Liliopsida; Poales; Poaceae; BEP
clade; Ehrhartoideae; Oryzeae; Oryza.
|
| Chromosome | |
| Location |
Chromosome 1:32338331..32339540 |
| Sequence Coding Region |
32338482..32338730,32338840..32339343 |
| Expression | |
| Genome Context |
<gbrowseImage1> name=NC_008394:32338331..32339540 source=RiceChromosome01 preset=GeneLocation </gbrowseImage1> |
| Gene Structure |
<gbrowseImage2> name=NC_008394:32338331..32339540 source=RiceChromosome01 preset=GeneLocation </gbrowseImage2> |
| Coding Sequence |
<cdnaseq>atgatgggcggcgagtgcaaggtccaccagctccaggccgccggcgacgggggcccaggcgccgtcgcgccgttcgtggcgaagacgttccacatggtgagcgacccgtcgacgaacgccgtcgtgcgctggggaggcgccggcaacacgttcctcgtgctcgaccccgccgccttctccgacttcctcctcccctcctacttcaagcaccgcaacttcgccagcttcgtccggcagctcaacacctacggattccgcaaggtggatccggacaggtgggagttcgcgcacgagtcgttcctgcgggggcaggcgcagctgctgccgcggatcgtgcgcaagaagaagaagggcggggcggcgccggggtgcagggagctgtgcgaggaaggggaggaggtgcggggcaccatcgaggcggtgcagcggctgcgggaggagcagaggggcatggaggaggagctccaggccatggaccagaggctgcgcgccgccgagagccgcccgggccagatgatggcgttcctcgccaagctcgccgacgaaccgggcgtcgtgctgcgcgccatgctcgccaagaaggaggagctggccgcggccggcaacaacgggtccgatccctgcaagaggcggcggatcggggccgacacggggcgcggcggcgtggcgaccggcggcgacgcggccgagatggcgcagagcagaggcaccgtgccgttcccgttctctgttcttggccaagtgttctactag</cdnaseq> |
| Protein Sequence |
<aaseq> 1 mmggeckvhq lqaagdggpg avapfvaktf hmvsdpstna vvrwggagnt flvldpaafs
61 dfllpsyfkh rnfasfvrql ntygfrkvdp drwefahesf lrgqaqllpr ivrkkkkgga
121 apgcrelcee geevrgtiea vqrlreeqrg meeelqamdq rlraaesrpg qmmaflakla
181 depgvvlram lakkeelaaa gnngsdpckr rrigadtgrg gvatggdaae maqsrgtvpf
241 pfsvlgqvfy</aaseq>
|
| Gene Sequence |
<dnaseqindica>152..400#510..1013# 1 gcgcgctcac tccctccctt gcccccaccg acgaacggaa caaatcttag cgaggaaaaa
61 gcgagcgctt ttttcttatc ctgttccgcg ggcgcgctgc cacgaccgaa ccgggaggat
121 acttgcgaat tacacgatcg gttgtggcac tatgatgggc ggcgagtgca aggtccacca
181 gctccaggcc gccggcgacg ggggcccagg cgccgtcgcg ccgttcgtgg cgaagacgtt
241 ccacatggtg agcgacccgt cgacgaacgc cgtcgtgcgc tggggaggcg ccggcaacac
301 gttcctcgtg ctcgaccccg ccgccttctc cgacttcctc ctcccctcct acttcaagca
361 ccgcaacttc gccagcttcg tccggcagct caacacctac gtatgtatat gcgcctcctc
421 tgcttctgcc atctgtgcat agctctgtgt gtggcttcgt gtgtcgtcat ggttgtaact
481 ctttccgttg ctgctgtctt ctctctcagg gattccgcaa ggtggatccg gacaggtggg
541 agttcgcgca cgagtcgttc ctgcgggggc aggcgcagct gctgccgcgg atcgtgcgca
601 agaagaagaa gggcggggcg gcgccggggt gcagggagct gtgcgaggaa ggggaggagg
661 tgcggggcac catcgaggcg gtgcagcggc tgcgggagga gcagaggggc atggaggagg
721 agctccaggc catggaccag aggctgcgcg ccgccgagag ccgcccgggc cagatgatgg
781 cgttcctcgc caagctcgcc gacgaaccgg gcgtcgtgct gcgcgccatg ctcgccaaga
841 aggaggagct ggccgcggcc ggcaacaacg ggtccgatcc ctgcaagagg cggcggatcg
901 gggccgacac ggggcgcggc ggcgtggcga ccggcggcga cgcggccgag atggcgcaga
961 gcagaggcac cgtgccgttc ccgttctctg ttcttggcca agtgttctac tagccgcaac
1021 agggccagat aggtgtacac gtacgcagtc ccccgttgta tatataacaa cagtgtaact
1081 tcgcctcggt ttagttgcct actgttaagt tagtgtactt aagcataata ggagagtttg
1141 gctaagtagc tatcgttgga tttgtgtgta tatatcgact atcgaggggc taataacgcc
1201 tattttgttc</dnaseqindica>
|
| External Link(s) |
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Romy Schmidt, Jos H.M. Schippers, Annelie Welker, Delphine Mieulet, Emmanuel Guiderdoni and Bernd Mueller-Roeber,et al.(2009)Transcription factor OsHsfC1b regulates salt tolerance and development in Oryza sativa ssp. japonica.AoB PLANTS 011:1-17.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Wenhuo Hua, Guocheng Hua, Bin Han et al.(2009)Genome-wide survey and expression profiling of heat shock proteins and heat shock factors revealed overlapped and stress specific response under abiotic stresses in rice.Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 10:291-300.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Chuang WANG, Qian ZHANG, Hui-xia SHOU et al.(2009)Identification and expression analysis of OsHsfs in rice.Plant Science 176:583–590.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Nover, L., Bharti, K., Doring, P., Mishra, S.K., Ganguli, A.,Scharf, K.D. et al.(2001)Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: how many heat stress transcription factors do we need?Cell Stress Chaperones 6:177-89.