Difference between revisions of "BPH gene"
(→Mapping of BPH gene) |
(→Mapping of BPH gene) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:Table 1.PNG]] | [[File:Table 1.PNG]] | ||
[[File:Table 2.PNG]] | [[File:Table 2.PNG]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Reference == | ||
| + | 1. T. RAM;R. DEEN;S. K. GAUTAM;K. RAMESH;Y. K. RAO;D. S. BRAR, Identification of new genes for Brown Planthopper resistance in rice introgressed from O. glaberrima and O. minuta. Rice Genetics Newsletters, 2010, 25(): 67-69 | ||
Latest revision as of 03:14, 11 June 2014
The brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens, is one of the most serious insect pests throughout rice growing areas in Asia. This is especially true in countries mainly culturing Japonica rice cultivars that do not have a gene conferring resistance to BPH, and where outbreaks of BHP are therefore a severe problem. The BPH causes direct damage to crops and indirect damage by acting as a vector for viral diseases. Chemical treatment is the conventional method of controlling pests such as BPH, even though it is expensive and harmful to the environment. Many researchers have reported that host plant resistance is the most effective way of controlling pests including BPH, and thus breeding of insect resistance has taken priority in rice improvement programs. Until now, 13BPH resistance genes, together with several quantitative trait loci (QTLs) controlling BPH resistance, have been reported in two wild relatives and indica cultivars. Diverse sources of BPH resistance have been identified and genetic analysis has revealed 6 dominant [Bph1, 3, 6, 9, 10, and 13(t)] and 7 recessive [bph2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11(t), and 12(t)] genes controlling BPH resistance. Bph1, bph2, Bph9, and Bph10(t) were assigned to rice chromosome 12. Bph1 and bph2 confer resistance to biotypes 1, 3 and 1, 2 which are widely distributed in Southeast Asia. Many studies aimed at identifying BPH resistance genes have been conducted over the years in order to develop a resistant cultivar; however, a japonica cultivar with a BPH resistance gene has not yet been developed. Thirteen of the BPH resistance genes identified so far are not from japonica rice, but from indica rice. In bioassays, it has been reported that the reaction of early rice seedlings to BPH differed between japonica and indica. Japonica introgression lines with BPH resistance genes exhibited undesirable characteristics such as poor grain quality and lodging-related traits to which the resistance genes seemed to be highly linked. The undesirable linkage drag between a BPH resistance gene and genes conferring agriculturally important characters may be removed by intensive work to select recombinants between the traits, and a molecular marker tightly linked to the target gene could be useful for selecting the desired recombinants。 The use of tightly linked genetic markers for resistance genes offers great scope for improving the efficiency of conventional plant breeding by allowing selection to be based on molecular markers linked to a trait at an early stage of growth, rather than being based on the trait itself. Resistance genes to gall midge and blast have been identified in rice, and linkage between DNA markers and these resistance genes has been analyzed. In this way linkage maps of genes associated with resistance to diseases and pests have been constructed in wheat, barley, and other economically important crops. The current study was conducted to identify Bph1-related DNA markers in rice, and thus to permit the establishment of a marker-assisted breeding program to introgress the BPH-resistance gene into japonica rice cultivars.
BPH Evalution
Brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stål.) is one of the most damaging pests of rice in Asia. It causes severe yield reduction by directly sucking the plant sap and acting as a vector of virus diseases such as rice grassy stunt and ragged stunt (Khush and Brar, 1991). Host plant resistance has been recognized as significant strategy to control BPH damage in contrast to the chemical control. The genetics of BPH resistance is well studied and as many as 21 major genes have been identified in cultivated and wild species (Qifa Zhang, 2007 and Fujita et al., 2008). Among the BPH biotypes prevailing in South East Asia, biotype 4 is the most destructive and distributed over the Indian subcontinent (Heinrichs, 1986). The biotype variations results in overcome of resistance to several major genes, therefore, the identification of additional BPH resistance genes is required to address the issue of durable resistance.
Mapping of BPH gene
The repeated screening over the years of different donors with known gene, against local BPH biotype available at the Directorate of Rice Research, Hyderabad, India, recorded consistent resistance in Rathu Henati (Bph3 & Bph17), Swarnalatha (Bph 6) and ADR 52 (bph20(t) & Bph21(t)). While rest of other donors Mudgo (Bph1), IR 56 (Bph3), Pokkali (Bph9), IR 65482-4-136-2-2 (Bph10), IR 65482-7-216-1-2 (Bph18) showed either susceptible or moderate resistance(Table 1&Table 2).
Reference
1. T. RAM;R. DEEN;S. K. GAUTAM;K. RAMESH;Y. K. RAO;D. S. BRAR, Identification of new genes for Brown Planthopper resistance in rice introgressed from O. glaberrima and O. minuta. Rice Genetics Newsletters, 2010, 25(): 67-69