In vitro studies on Rickettsia-host cell interactions: lag phase in intracellular growth cycle as a function of stage of growth of infecting Rickettsia prowazeki, with preliminary observations on inhibition of rickettsial uptake by host cell fragments.

C L Wisseman, A D Waddell, D J Silverman
Author Information

Abstract

Two Rickettsia prowazeki seeds, an "early" seed in the logarithmic or exponential growth phase and a "late" seed in the stationary or possibly early decline phase, were prepared in chicken embryo (CE) cell cultures and compared with respect to morphology and infection cycle in CE cells in culture. Differences in size and ultrastructure of the organisms in the two seeds were similar to those seen in other gram-negative bacteria at comparable stages to growth. Vacuolar structures, rare in log-phase organisms, were common in stationary-phase organisms. Minute spherical forms reminiscent of minicells were seen in the stationary-phase preparations. In quantitative uptake experiments, organisms, typical in size and morphology of each preparation, had comparable capacity per plaque-forming unit to penetrate into CE cells in suspension when the seeds had been depleted of host cell membrane fragments and other debris. This suggests that host cell fragments, presumably of membrane origin, competitively inhibit rickettsial uptake by intact CE cells. Organisms of the log-phase organisms displayed a lag phase of about 7.5 h, during which they enlarged and increased in intensity of staining, before entering the log phase of growth.

References

  1. J Gen Microbiol. 1975 Jan;86(1):12-28 [PMID: 803546]
  2. Infect Immun. 1975 Jun;11(6):1244-51 [PMID: 806524]
  3. Infect Immun. 1975 Jun;11(6):1391-404 [PMID: 806528]
  4. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1975;69:1-84 [PMID: 1098854]
  5. Infect Immun. 1974 Mar;9(3):571-5 [PMID: 4206030]
  6. J Bacteriol. 1974 Jul;119(1):303-24 [PMID: 4209778]
  7. Infect Immun. 1974 Jul;10(1):257-63 [PMID: 4210339]
  8. J Infect Dis. 1974 Dec;130(6):564-74 [PMID: 4214880]
  9. Infect Immun. 1972 May;5(5):715-22 [PMID: 4629250]
  10. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jan;95(1):259-61 [PMID: 4866101]
  11. J Bacteriol. 1970 Feb;101(2):574-83 [PMID: 4905311]
  12. J Bacteriol. 1965 Nov;90(5):1387-404 [PMID: 4954556]
  13. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Feb;9:409-14 [PMID: 13764136]
  14. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208-12 [PMID: 13986422]
  15. Stain Technol. 1964 May;39:135-40 [PMID: 14157454]
  16. J Bacteriol. 1941 Oct;42(4):479-99 [PMID: 16560464]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Feb;57(2):321-6 [PMID: 16591472]

MeSH Term

Cells, Cultured
Inclusion Bodies
Mitosis
Rickettsia prowazekii

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0growthphasecellorganismsCEseedscellsuptakehostfragmentsRickettsiaprowazekiseedmorphologycyclesizeseencomparablelog-phasestationary-phasemembranerickettsiallagTwo"early"logarithmicexponential"late"stationarypossiblyearlydeclinepreparedchickenembryoculturescomparedrespectinfectioncultureDifferencesultrastructuretwosimilargram-negativebacteriastagesVacuolarstructuresrarecommonMinutesphericalformsreminiscentminicellspreparationsquantitativeexperimentstypicalpreparationcapacityperplaque-formingunitpenetratesuspensiondepleteddebrissuggestspresumablyorigincompetitivelyinhibitintactOrganismsdisplayed75henlargedincreasedintensitystainingenteringlogvitrostudiesRickettsia-hostinteractions:intracellularfunctionstageinfectingpreliminaryobservationsinhibition

Similar Articles

Cited By