[The pros and cons of haemoperfusion (author's transl)].

H Hennemann, I E Richter, D Brunswig, A Röckel, J Kult, W Gattenlöhner, A Heidland
Author Information

Abstract

6 patients with severe self-poisoning were treated by charcoal-haemoperfusion in our centre up to now. In four of them (all suffering from sleeping drug overdosage) the treatment was successful. Two patients with intoxications by agrochemicals died in spite of haemoperfusion. Side effects of haemoperfusion were drops of blood pressure and platelet count, depletion of immune bodies, and adsorption of remedies. Up to now, the indication for haemoperfusion has to consider these secondary actions of encapsulated charcoal as inevitable.

References

  1. Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med. 1976;82 Pt 2:1961-3 [PMID: 1030149]
  2. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1976 Jan 30;101(5):155-8 [PMID: 1248387]
  3. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1976 Jan 30;101(5):158-62 [PMID: 2454]

MeSH Term

Arteries
Blood Platelets
Blood Pressure
Blood Proteins
Fibrin
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Immunoglobulins
Insecticides
Perfusion
Poisoning
Punctures
Renal Dialysis

Chemicals

Blood Proteins
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Immunoglobulins
Insecticides
Fibrin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0haemoperfusionpatientsnow6severeself-poisoningtreatedcharcoal-haemoperfusioncentrefoursufferingsleepingdrugoverdosagetreatmentsuccessfulTwointoxicationsagrochemicalsdiedspiteSideeffectsdropsbloodpressureplateletcountdepletionimmunebodiesadsorptionremediesindicationconsidersecondaryactionsencapsulatedcharcoalinevitable[Theprosconsauthor'stransl]

Similar Articles

Cited By