- M Alary: Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
The objective of this study was to compare an indirect immunofluorescence assay with culture methods for the identification of Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6 in hot water samples taken from domestic environments. Hot water samples were obtained from the water heater, the shower heads, and the most frequently used faucet of 211 private houses. Concentrated water samples were inoculated on buffered charcoal yeast extract agar (BCYE) and on a semi-selective culture medium (GPV). Colonies with a morphology similar to that of Legionellaceae were subcultured on BCYE and on blood agar plates; those that grew on the former but not the latter were further characterized and identified by direct immunofluorescence techniques. The concentrated samples were also smeared on multiple-well microscope slides and tested by indirect immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies against L. pneumophila, serogroups 1 to 6. Of the houses studied, 30% were found to contain culturable L. pneumophila in at least one water sample, whereas 63% were positive by indirect immunofluorescence. The sensitivity of this assay compared with culture varied from 16.7-21.1%, and its specificity was between 76.7% and 88.3% depending on the sample source (water heater, shower heads, or faucet). In the 38 houses with at least one positive sample found by both immunofluorescence and culture, total or partial agreement between serogroups identified by both techniques was only 34%. The results obtained in this study strongly suggest that indirect immunofluorescence is not an adequate alternative for the identification of L. pneumophila in hot water systems.