Familiality and partitioning the variability of femoral bone mineral density in women of child-bearing age.

M R Sowers, M Boehnke, M L Jannausch, M Crutchfield, G Corton, T L Burns
Author Information
  1. M R Sowers: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

Abstract

The contributions of polygenic loci and environmental factors to femoral bone mineral density (BMD) in g/cm2) variability were estimated in modified family sets consisting of women of child-bearing age. Femoral BMDs were measured in 535 women who were members of 137 family sets consisting minimally of an index, her sister, and unrelated female control. The family set could also include multiple sisters and first cousins. Women included in these family sets were all between 20 and 40 years of age to minimize the cohort effects of maturation and menopause on measures of BMD. BMDs were measured at three femoral sites using dual photon densitometry. Values were regressed on age and Quetelet Index which explained 13-15% of the variability in BMD (dependent on site). Subsequent variance components analysis on the residuals indicated that unmeasured polygenic loci accounted for substantial additional variability: 67% for femoral neck, 58% for Wards triangle, and 45% for trochanter. These results suggest that polygenic loci account for approximately half of the variability in maximal femoral BMD.

References

  1. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Apr;117(4):492-506 [PMID: 6837561]
  2. Calcif Tissue Res. 1978 May 26;25(2):197-201 [PMID: 566611]
  3. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Dec 1;109 (11):870-3 [PMID: 3190041]
  4. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989 Nov;45(5):265-72 [PMID: 2509013]
  5. Anat Rec. 1974 May;179(1):1-18 [PMID: 4821360]
  6. Epidemiol Rev. 1985;7:178-208 [PMID: 3902494]
  7. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Jan;53(1):132-42 [PMID: 1984338]
  8. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989 Dec;50(6):1244-59 [PMID: 2688394]
  9. J Clin Invest. 1987 Sep;80(3):706-10 [PMID: 3624485]
  10. JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):665-8 [PMID: 2404146]
  11. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 1;111(5):355-61 [PMID: 2764403]
  12. Ann Epidemiol. 1991 Feb;1(3):245-54 [PMID: 1669505]
  13. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Nov;52(5):878-88 [PMID: 2239765]
  14. J Bone Miner Res. 1988 Feb;3(1):13-8 [PMID: 3213603]
  15. N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 2;320(9):554-8 [PMID: 2915666]
  16. J Clin Invest. 1973 Nov;52(11):2800-8 [PMID: 4795916]
  17. Ann Hum Genet. 1976 May;39(4):485-91 [PMID: 952492]
  18. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988 Jun;66(6):1247-50 [PMID: 3372686]
  19. JAMA. 1984 Aug 10;252(6):799-802 [PMID: 6748181]
  20. Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5(6):471-2 [PMID: 3061869]
  21. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Nov;52(5):872-7 [PMID: 2239764]
  22. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Oct;110(4):492-503 [PMID: 507040]
  23. Am J Med Genet. 1983 Mar;14(3):513-24 [PMID: 6859102]
  24. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Sep 26;110:429-46 [PMID: 14061656]
  25. Calcif Tissue Int. 1990 Sep;47(3):130-5 [PMID: 2224587]
  26. Genet Epidemiol. 1986;3(2):85-93 [PMID: 3710140]
  27. Bone. 1987;8(4):207-9 [PMID: 3446256]
  28. Osteoporos Int. 1990 Oct;1(1):56-60 [PMID: 2133642]
  29. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Mar;44(3):429-33 [PMID: 2916585]
  30. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986 Jul;44(1):99-106 [PMID: 3728353]

MeSH Term

Adult
Analysis of Variance
Bone Density
Epidemiologic Methods
Female
Femur
Genetic Variation
Humans
Osteoporosis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0femoralBMDvariabilityfamilyagepolygeniclocisetswomenbonemineraldensityconsistingchild-bearingBMDsmeasuredcontributionsenvironmentalfactorsg/cm2estimatedmodifiedFemoral535members137minimallyindexsisterunrelatedfemalecontrolsetalsoincludemultiplesistersfirstcousinsWomenincluded2040yearsminimizecohorteffectsmaturationmenopausemeasuresthreesitesusingdualphotondensitometryValuesregressedQueteletIndexexplained13-15%dependentsiteSubsequentvariancecomponentsanalysisresidualsindicatedunmeasuredaccountedsubstantialadditionalvariability:67%neck58%Wardstriangle45%trochanterresultssuggestaccountapproximatelyhalfmaximalFamilialitypartitioning

Similar Articles

Cited By