Fusion of scoliosis by Harrington distraction rod. Interspinous process and sublaminar wiring compared in 42 cases.

S L Liu, S S Russo, T Borowiecki, F W Schroeder
Author Information
  1. S L Liu: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Division of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Springfield 62794-9230.

Abstract

Forty-two consecutive patients with scoliosis who between 1981 and 1988 underwent posterior Harrington distraction rod and interspinous process or sublaminar wiring were retrospectively reviewed. No difference was found between the techniques with respect to age, sex, curve pattern, curve magnitude, levels fused, operative time, blood loss, correction, and loss of correction at the 1-year and 2-year follow-up. The interspinous process wiring was superior to the sublaminar wiring as regards ease of technique, early ambulation, few complications, and a more effective means for maintaining the correction without postoperative immobilization.

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Bone Wires
Braces
Early Ambulation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Internal Fixators
Male
Radiography
Scoliosis
Spinal Fusion

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0wiringprocesssublaminarcorrectionscoliosisHarringtondistractionrodinterspinouscurvelossForty-twoconsecutivepatients19811988underwentposteriorretrospectivelyrevieweddifferencefoundtechniquesrespectagesexpatternmagnitudelevelsfusedoperativetimeblood1-year2-yearfollow-upsuperiorregardseasetechniqueearlyambulationcomplicationseffectivemeansmaintainingwithoutpostoperativeimmobilizationFusionInterspinouscompared42cases

Similar Articles

Cited By