Impairment of visual perception and visual short term memory scanning by transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital cortex.

G Beckers, V Hömberg
Author Information
  1. G Beckers: Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Federal Republic of Germany.

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of occipital cortex was performed using a magneto-electric stimulator with a maximum output of 2 Tesla in 24 normal volunteers. The identification of trigrams, presented for 14 ms in horizontal or vertical arrays was significantly impaired when the visual stimulus preceded the occipital magnetic shock by 40 to 120 ms. The extent of impairment was related to TMS intensity. The latency of perceptual impairment was shorter for more intense TMS. No perceptual impairment was obtained by "sham" stimulation when TMS shocks were applied to the upper cervical region rather than the occipital region to rule out unspecific startle reactions affecting attention possibly responsible for the observed reduction in performance. Occipital TMS did not evoke systematic eye movements except for blink responses at latencies beyond 40 ms which were too late to interfere with visual input. Depending on the required serial order of readout of the trigram perceptual impairment was more marked for the second and third part of the trigram. This demonstrates that TMS interferes with the internal serial processing of visual input. To elucidate this further, TMS was used in a Sternberg short term visual memory scanning task. TMS caused a marked decrease in memory scanning rates whereas visual stimulus encoding and storage remained unaffected when tested at various TMS delays. TMS appears to be a useful method to study processes of visual perception and short term memory handling in the occipital cortex. Advantages over classical visual masking techniques especially regarding topical localisation are discussed.

References

  1. Mov Disord. 1990;5(3):214-8 [PMID: 2143807]
  2. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:121-34 [PMID: 1773752]
  3. Lancet. 1984 Aug 11;2(8398):304-7 [PMID: 6146860]
  4. Lancet. 1989 Nov 18;2(8673):1223 [PMID: 2572937]
  5. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Dec;70(6):524-33 [PMID: 2461286]
  6. Neuropsychologia. 1980;18(2):225-9 [PMID: 7383314]
  7. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Feb;81(1):63-70 [PMID: 1705221]
  8. J Neurol Sci. 1987 Aug;80(1):91-110 [PMID: 3039071]
  9. Exp Brain Res. 1977 Jan 18;27(1):35-50 [PMID: 832687]
  10. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;74(6):458-62 [PMID: 2480226]
  11. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;50(2):159-66 [PMID: 3572430]
  12. Science. 1911 Jan 13;33(837):68-71 [PMID: 17788965]
  13. Psychol Res. 1979;41(1):2-61 [PMID: 538209]
  14. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1966 Jan;20(1):1-18 [PMID: 4161317]
  15. J Physiol. 1954 Aug 27;125(2):278-91 [PMID: 13192818]
  16. Science. 1966 Aug 5;153(3736):652-4 [PMID: 5939936]
  17. Nature. 1980 May 22;285(5762):227 [PMID: 7374773]
  18. Psychol Rev. 1973 Jan;80(1):1-52 [PMID: 4689202]
  19. Exp Brain Res. 1987;68(3):541-64 [PMID: 3691726]
  20. Vision Res. 1973 Feb;13(2):355-69 [PMID: 4692525]
  21. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr. 1956;194(6):597-619 [PMID: 13373388]

MeSH Term

Adult
Eye Movements
Female
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Middle Aged
Occipital Lobe
Reaction Time
Time Factors
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Vision, Ocular
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TMSvisualoccipitalimpairmentmemorymagneticstimulationcortexmsperceptualshorttermscanningstimulus40regioninputserialtrigrammarkedperceptionTranscranialperformedusingmagneto-electricstimulatormaximumoutput2Tesla24normalvolunteersidentificationtrigramspresented14horizontalverticalarrayssignificantlyimpairedprecededshock120extentrelatedintensitylatencyshorterintenseobtained"sham"shocksapplieduppercervicalratherruleunspecificstartlereactionsaffectingattentionpossiblyresponsibleobservedreductionperformanceOccipitalevokesystematiceyemovementsexceptblinkresponseslatenciesbeyondlateinterfereDependingrequiredorderreadoutsecondthirdpartdemonstratesinterferesinternalprocessingelucidateusedSternbergtaskcauseddecreaserateswhereasencodingstorageremainedunaffectedtestedvariousdelaysappearsusefulmethodstudyprocesseshandlingAdvantagesclassicalmaskingtechniquesespeciallyregardingtopicallocalisationdiscussedImpairmenttranscranial

Similar Articles

Cited By